billy p

billy p

Audioholic Ninja
I follow most of these threads and shy away from entering controversial ones:) .So, everyone is entitled to their opinion. We're allowed to express a point untill it becomes reduntant:) . This AV forum allows for this headroom:D !
So, why if one is to express a point of view the label ignorant,uninformed or hostile is attached:( ! Yet,the others whom are equal to that argument from the otherside aren't given equal preference:mad: .
We have the same social issues here,they will never go away,such is life.Therefore,saying your piece or talking your mind you may be considered a liability if caught on the wrong side of argument and your outa here!:confused:
PS: I'm not looking to get run.Hell, I thought MSN was fun but I had nothing to talk about. I think this forum is great because we all are av nuts.:D
But getting run for having an opinion is wrong!!
 
I

InTheIndustry

Senior Audioholic
Ummmmm, are you speaking in a hypothetical sense here or is there an example you'd like to discuss?
 
JoeE SP9

JoeE SP9

Senior Audioholic
What point of view are you reluctant to mention?:D
 
shokhead

shokhead

Audioholic General
billy p said:
I follow most of these threads and shy away from entering controversial ones:) .So, everyone is entitled to their opinion. We're allowed to express a point untill it becomes reduntant:) . This AV forum allows for this headroom:D !
So, why if one is to express a point of view the label ignorant,uninformed or hostile is attached:( ! Yet,the others whom are equal to that argument from the otherside aren't given equal preference:mad: .
We have the same social issues here,they will never go away,such is life.Therefore,saying your piece or talking your mind you may be considered a liability if caught on the wrong side of argument and your outa here!:confused:
PS: I'm not looking to get run.Hell, I thought MSN was fun but I had nothing to talk about. I think this forum is great because we all are av nuts.:D
But getting run for having an opinion is wrong!!
Has somebody got run and i missed it? Your a pretty uninformed ignoramis and dont be so hostile about it. Run this guy.
 
ironlung

ironlung

Banned
This just in.....NEWS FLASH......Sad But True.....

What's fair? Positively absolutely nothing. You deserve absolutely nothing for being born. No god given rights. All men are not created equal.;)

Liars and cheats usually win. Stepping on your face is a good way to get up in the world.:)

Standing up to a bully does not always go like it does on "Diff'rent Strokes".:D

Being smart and working hard does not mean you will be rich.:eek:

Right and wrong are vague at best.:confused:


Sorry,
Ironlung
 
J

JAD2

I listen with my mouth open...
From what I've seen in years of running my own auto forum and going to others is.

Depends on your post count, how your treated. You could be the biggest a** in the world but a post whore whom adds nothing to a informative post, you win the new guy thats has one post and potentially is a GURU at whatever loses.

If you dont off topic alot, another type of post whoring, your info is not welcome!!!

If the board has advertisers, where its junk crap or not, you post against it, you lose!!

Things that are weak minded, cant and wont work have the largest amount of post whores behind it, so no matter what, you lose and this applies to price costing too,its more $$$$ so it must be better, its weak minded also!!

I've heard at these type forums I've been at is we are trying to get sound as close to real as possible and the same for video.Thats why this speaker/amp/receiver/cable/wire is better than the other, this video equip is better than the other and is used as reasoning for some posts. OK, no problem with that, BUT!!

First off, WERE YOU THERE?????

If you werent there during the recording then there is no way you can say whatever you have, makes it as close to real, is possible.
There are so many shades of colors, colors that are faded, lighting etc etc etc, so if your not there, you couldnt duplicate it.
Same goes for sound, who's to say it didnt sound exactly like what Bose speakers did????

Its all a matter of taste etc, and weak minded I SPENT WHATEVER takes over. The more it costs the better to real it comes out and if your not at the top of the spending heap your posts mean nothing when your in , WHAT SPEAKER IS BEST, WHAT TV IS THE BEST etc etc etc !!!
 
masak_aer

masak_aer

Senior Audioholic
I sense there's a lot of anger in you Jad...:eek: This is one way to let your steam out..keep on going...:D
 
N

Nick250

Audioholic Samurai
To repete an earlier post, who got run out?

Nick
 
billy p

billy p

Audioholic Ninja
Jad2

excatly crap is crap,so then why is ones b.s. different then the others and is treated differently?:)
 
J

JAD2

I listen with my mouth open...
billy p said:
excatly crap is crap,so then why is ones b.s. different then the others and is treated differently?:)

Even better is when you make a post explaining why you think it happens, someone DELETES IT!!!
 
J

JAD2

I listen with my mouth open...
I made a post on how I attack this crap, opinion stuff and it just disppears!!!!
 
M

markw

Audioholic Overlord
this thread is like the Seinfeld show.

It's about nothing at all. No specifics, just a post to biitch about other posters and the moderaters ...simply mahvalous!!! :cool:

here's a hint. Sometimes it's not what one says, but how one says it.
 
Tomorrow

Tomorrow

Audioholic Ninja
LOL, I'm not exactly sure who's doing what to whom, here, and who is saying what. And I'm with Nick250...who was run out?

As for post/person/position vs. post/person/position...there is a way of posting and then there is a WAY of posting. Here's a fictional(!!!) example. I'm gonna post the same thought, but phrased in two different ways (as would likely be the case from two different people).

A. "I disagree. I think twisted, pole-opposing silver interconnect cables are not 'snake oil'. The benefit is audible to me."

B. "You're an idiot and just follow whatever the so called 'experts' say. Think for yourself for a change. There sure is a benefit to twisted, pole-opposing silver interconnect cables and if you don't believe it, try turning up your hearing aid!"

It's the "B" style poster that is going to get his hand slapped, not to mention be largely ignored by those trying to form an opinion about whatever matter is being discussed. And sure, it's the Steam Vent...but civility is not to be checked at the door, even there.
 
T

The Dukester

Audioholic Chief
JAD2 said:
I made a post on how I attack this crap, opinion stuff and it just disppears!!!!

You only have 53 posts and I believe three were in here...according to your logic, you're in danger of disappearing:eek: Careful!:)
 
T

The Dukester

Audioholic Chief
rjbudz said:
LOL, I'm not exactly sure who's doing what to whom, here, and who is saying what. And I'm with Nick250...who was run out?

As for post/person/position vs. post/person/position...there is a way of posting and then there is a WAY of posting. Here's a fictional(!!!) example. I'm gonna post the same thought, but phrased in two different ways (as would likely be the case from two different people).

A. "I disagree. I think twisted, pole-opposing silver interconnect cables are not 'snake oil'. The benefit is audible to me."

B. "You're an idiot and just follow whatever the so called 'experts' say. Think for yourself for a change. There sure is a benefit to twisted, pole-opposing silver interconnect cables and if you don't believe it, try turning up your hearing aid!"

It's the "B" style poster that is going to get his hand slapped, not to mention be largely ignored by those trying to form an opinion about whatever matter is being discussed. And sure, it's the Steam Vent...but civility is not to be checked at the door, even there.

Great post! You are correct; personal attacks are a sure way to get warned or booted.
 
ironlung

ironlung

Banned
I've never been warned!:D I've never even had a post deleted. Except when the whole thread disappears.

I guess the mods and admin just consider the source.:D
 
~JC~

~JC~

Audioholic
Profit

It took me awhile to understand that this site is part of a for profit enterprise. Only site I visit like it. The rules are different. You have to rant somewhere else, on your own time.
 
J

JAD2

I listen with my mouth open...
The Dukester said:
You only have 53 posts and I believe three were in here...according to your logic, you're in danger of disappearing:eek: Careful!:)

Oh, dont I know it!!!!



""""" LOL, I'm not exactly sure who's doing what to whom, here, and who is saying what. And I'm with Nick250...who was run out?

As for post/person/position vs. post/person/position...there is a way of posting and then there is a WAY of posting. Here's a fictional(!!!) example. I'm gonna post the same thought, but phrased in two different ways (as would likely be the case from two different people).

A. "I disagree. I think twisted, pole-opposing silver interconnect cables are not 'snake oil'. The benefit is audible to me."

B. "You're an idiot and just follow whatever the so called 'experts' say. Think for yourself for a change. There sure is a benefit to twisted, pole-opposing silver interconnect cables and if you don't believe it, try turning up your hearing aid!"

It's the "B" style poster that is going to get his hand slapped, not to mention be largely ignored by those trying to form an opinion about whatever matter is being discussed. And sure, it's the Steam Vent...but civility is not to be checked at the door, even there.""""""

rjbudz- I totally disagree with you there- If poster "B" is a long standing person of the forum, with lots of post count under his belt or has given money/donated to the forum he will get away with this 99.9% of the time. I've been on different kinds of forums since 1995, moderated a few, admin of a few. If poster "B" or even "A" has less than a few hundred posts, he is in trouble 2 ways. One it doesnt matter his experience outside the forum, if he isnt on the winning side he is labeled a defunct person to listen too. But if he does "B" style, automatically watched.

Then alot has to do again with money. Magazines are and have been notorious for this since there inception and now forums are following the same game. Who pays, wins as in advertising, so if you go against the ads which pay for space, your posts are edited/removed etc. If Joe Schmoe and advertisers is selling a product that most everyone knows is junk/can't work etc he still gets protected. Magazines follow trends and money, always have even if the stuff is junk.
And example- You ever see those fuel savers??? Magnets that attach to fuel lines saying up to X increase?? The FTC took them on to verify or deny they worked, they dont, they've been banned saying they do work. So now the ads have been altered to not guarantee they work, but still say possible increases in mileage. Still they get ad spaces and forum time and you CANNOT post against them. The most your can go against it is saying you tried it, dont work, period. No junk, snake oil or comments of that nature allowed.

You think I'm kidding, but this site isnt too bad, but try this stuff at AVS forums. I saw a guy whom tested some stuff and advertiser had through a college experiment to find out if it had validity, it didnt.He posted the results, was warned against it, posted it again and was banned. Now 2 years later this advertiser does not pay in anymore and people are now posting against it 10 fold with no reprisals saying all kinds of nasties.

Now for me at a forum. I watched there as I've seen here people blast Bose to no end. Get nasty and down right crude when the topic arises, nothing happens at all, no warnings etc and it goes from both sides "A" to "B" and worse. Now one post I read had this guy mention his speakers and how good they were against the Bose.Its a top end name also I will add. So I add i, OK, Bose may not be that good and there overpriced I will agree.But talking about a rip-off, overpriced etc, you know those speakers your pushing??? You know that NAME brand doesnt even build its own driver, crossover and cabinets!! Here is your speakers over at parts express, these drivers, those crossovers and whomevers cabinets which were similar to the ones that site had listed. $375 gets it all un-assembled, you paid close to $2K for someone to assemble them, talk about overpriced stuff that isnt that good. H*ll those are bargain priced drivers on that site and here is a link to prove they dont build there own and do this largish volume purchases from places like this!!! GOT NASTILY WARNED this was a paid advertiser, leave alone and also was mention parts express links will not be tolerated!!!!

My sites have always been neutral and allowed debate with no nasties allowed from any member, all are equal. If the debate went on like cables do on audio/video forums were its split and went on to even subtle nasties, those parts were removed, but it would continue to a winner came in. Someone would link tests, his own tests showing data one way or another, whatever the outcome, thread was done. Locked it was and any other post starting with that topic again and not having proof the other way was edited and linked to the original.
It kept the peace, moderation and administrations must always remain neutral and must be so!!! We always treated opinions with the same regard as politics and religion. We wanted and strived for MEASURABLE DATA/PROOF within the topic area postings of products etc. Only open topic was allowed more lee way for crap, but that was limited also as not to allow attacking of members. If you see sided wars allowed, then you know the forum isnt neutral and people like myself like neutral, information of a true nature, not opinion on products!!
 
Tomorrow

Tomorrow

Audioholic Ninja
JAD2 said:
Oh, dont I know it!!!!



""""" LOL, I'm not exactly sure who's doing what to whom, here, and who is saying what. And I'm with Nick250...who was run out?

As for post/person/position vs. post/person/position...there is a way of posting and then there is a WAY of posting. Here's a fictional(!!!) example. I'm gonna post the same thought, but phrased in two different ways (as would likely be the case from two different people).

A. "I disagree. I think twisted, pole-opposing silver interconnect cables are not 'snake oil'. The benefit is audible to me."

B. "You're an idiot and just follow whatever the so called 'experts' say. Think for yourself for a change. There sure is a benefit to twisted, pole-opposing silver interconnect cables and if you don't believe it, try turning up your hearing aid!"

It's the "B" style poster that is going to get his hand slapped, not to mention be largely ignored by those trying to form an opinion about whatever matter is being discussed. And sure, it's the Steam Vent...but civility is not to be checked at the door, even there.""""""

rjbudz- I totally disagree with you there- If poster "B" is a long standing person of the forum, with lots of post count under his belt or has given money/donated to the forum he will get away with this 99.9% of the time. I've been on different kinds of forums since 1995, moderated a few, admin of a few. If poster "B" or even "A" has less than a few hundred posts, he is in trouble 2 ways. One it doesnt matter his experience outside the forum, if he isnt on the winning side he is labeled a defunct person to listen too. But if he does "B" style, automatically watched.

Then alot has to do again with money. Magazines are and have been notorious for this since there inception and now forums are following the same game. Who pays, wins as in advertising, so if you go against the ads which pay for space, your posts are edited/removed etc. If Joe Schmoe and advertisers is selling a product that most everyone knows is junk/can't work etc he still gets protected. Magazines follow trends and money, always have even if the stuff is junk.
And example- You ever see those fuel savers??? Magnets that attach to fuel lines saying up to X increase?? The FTC took them on to verify or deny they worked, they dont, they've been banned saying they do work. So now the ads have been altered to not guarantee they work, but still say possible increases in mileage. Still they get ad spaces and forum time and you CANNOT post against them. The most your can go against it is saying you tried it, dont work, period. No junk, snake oil or comments of that nature allowed.

You think I'm kidding, but this site isnt too bad, but try this stuff at AVS forums. I saw a guy whom tested some stuff and advertiser had through a college experiment to find out if it had validity, it didnt.He posted the results, was warned against it, posted it again and was banned. Now 2 years later this advertiser does not pay in anymore and people are now posting against it 10 fold with no reprisals saying all kinds of nasties.

Now for me at a forum. I watched there as I've seen here people blast Bose to no end. Get nasty and down right crude when the topic arises, nothing happens at all, no warnings etc and it goes from both sides "A" to "B" and worse. Now one post I read had this guy mention his speakers and how good they were against the Bose.Its a top end name also I will add. So I add i, OK, Bose may not be that good and there overpriced I will agree.But talking about a rip-off, overpriced etc, you know those speakers your pushing??? You know that NAME brand doesnt even build its own driver, crossover and cabinets!! Here is your speakers over at parts express, these drivers, those crossovers and whomevers cabinets which were similar to the ones that site had listed. $375 gets it all un-assembled, you paid close to $2K for someone to assemble them, talk about overpriced stuff that isnt that good. H*ll those are bargain priced drivers on that site and here is a link to prove they dont build there own and do this largish volume purchases from places like this!!! GOT NASTILY WARNED this was a paid advertiser, leave alone and also was mention parts express links will not be tolerated!!!!

My sites have always been neutral and allowed debate with no nasties allowed from any member, all are equal. If the debate went on like cables do on audio/video forums were its split and went on to even subtle nasties, those parts were removed, but it would continue to a winner came in. Someone would link tests, his own tests showing data one way or another, whatever the outcome, thread was done. Locked it was and any other post starting with that topic again and not having proof the other way was edited and linked to the original.
It kept the peace, moderation and administrations must always remain neutral and must be so!!! We always treated opinions with the same regard as politics and religion. We wanted and strived for MEASURABLE DATA/PROOF within the topic area postings of products etc. Only open topic was allowed more lee way for crap, but that was limited also as not to allow attacking of members. If you see sided wars allowed, then you know the forum isnt neutral and people like myself like neutral, information of a true nature, not opinion on products!!
Interesting post, Jad2. It's too bad you "completely disagree" with me. I think I'm safe in warning you that if you start flaming someone with personal insults, you will get your butt kicked outta here. That's all I was saying.

I also believe you have a valid point on the bashing of advertisers...especially at the other site you mentioned. We all pretty much agree with that assessment of slash and burn editing, and is a principle reason I no longer visit it. But the OP and some of your initial rant on this thread was directed toward this Audioholics site and is unfair, IMHO. This is indeed a 'for profit' site, but the rules are pretty well spelled out when you sign up. I think they are eminently fair. If one doesn't agree with them...don't sign up. All of these sites are run by people, Jad2. They don't enjoy being bashed or accused of bias any more than you do. They put the time, effort, and money in to run these things, just like you did with your auto forum. We're here at their hospitality. The admins are not here to serve our every whim.
 
J

JAD2

I listen with my mouth open...
rjbudz said:
Interesting post, Jad2. It's too bad you "completely disagree" with me. I think I'm safe in warning you that if you start flaming someone with personal insults, you will get your butt kicked outta here. That's all I was saying.

But the OP and some of your initial rant on this thread was directed toward this Audioholics site and is unfair, IMHO. This is indeed a 'for profit' site, but the rules are pretty well spelled out when you sign up. I think they are eminently fair. If one doesn't agree with them...don't sign up. All of these sites are run by people, Jad2. They don't enjoy being bashed or accused of bias any more than you do. They put the time, effort, and money in to run these things, just like you did with your auto forum. We're here at their hospitality. The admins are not here to serve our every whim.

The first paragraph isnt true. It not so prevalent here as with the other audio/video sites or any other site in general. I've seen personal attacks here and like I said that werent as prevalent as other sites, but do happen. You could say its moderation, which we hope would be the case, but I think its because of its size, popularity, it doesnt lend to such and could be it nipped in the butt before it gets going.

Show me where I attacked this site, because I did not and one of the reasons I come here is for level headedness even though I see the same mind games products being backed.

Forum rules per board type are all the same, there is no difference. The difference is in the admins and how they chose to interpret the rules as stated and apply them. The original post was about the un-neutralness between posters and how there treated. Which again I stated as a stature thing which I'm am not wrong about, no way, no how. Average Joe, no money down, no post count is always at the bottom on a profit only driven site. He will get warned and or banned on minor things alot faster than money down, post count guy. This money down post guy, will at best get warned behind the scenes quite a few times versus average Joe.

Again I didnt attack this site, I havent been here long enough to figure out the trends, but some minor ones do exist and I meant FORUMS in general, not particularly this one and the original poster could have meant this one and others!!!

I dont have a problem with a site making money, it has to have it to run. Been there, done that. But having double standards I dont agree with at all. The site wont exist if people dont go to it and if the info/posting types are allowed to be factitious in nature. You know how many internet keyboard have nothing better to do 3000+ post count , have a great sig, but dont actually own this equipment, but donated are around???
Then with advertisers, if the advertiser really has a great piece of equipment you would think he knows the in and outs of it, right??? And the business he is in also, right?? Why then are we not allowed to debate his tactics, advertising,direction, quality etc. etc.etc. If he knows the business that well, his product was that good then there must be DATA to support it and to argue against solid data is just plain stupid, some will, but still stupid. If the product cant support what it claims we should as a right, go against it. But some forums and again this is in general will not allow it, un-equal playing field.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top