What do you think of a Sony STR-DB830?

S

SpkR newb

Enthusiast
The title says it all and please, spare me with "Sony makes good batteries so it can't also make good recievers" crap.. And yes, I have no idea whatsoever about recievers, that's why I need your help.
 
R

rnatalli

Audioholic Ninja
I've had too many negative experience with Sony receivers in the past which is why I never consider them. But, I admit I haven't checked out their newer gear.

On another note, all new audioholics have to go through initiation so you will not be spared :D
 
bandphan

bandphan

Banned
With other offerings that have good room correction, id recommend Yamaha, Denon, and Pioneer for a noob. The setup is easy and you wont have to worry about your amps running 300 degrees
 
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
With other offerings that have good room correction, id recommend Yamaha, Denon, and Pioneer for a noob. The setup is easy and you wont have to worry about your amps running 300 degrees
marshmellow roast anyone? :D
 
S

SpkR newb

Enthusiast
With other offerings that have good room correction, id recommend Yamaha, Denon, and Pioneer for a noob. The setup is easy and you wont have to worry about your amps running 300 degrees
So if Yamaha, Denon, Pioneer are for noobs, Sony is professional gear or just complete poop? :)

Anyway, I'm not wanting to know on Sony on general, what do you think of this specific reciever (STR-DB 830)?
 
R

rnatalli

Audioholic Ninja
I'm not familiar with the particular model you're mentioning, but Sony just doesn't have the greatest track record when it comes to receivers.
 
OttoMatic

OttoMatic

Senior Audioholic
Yeah, just skip the Sony stuff. Sorry to not address your specific question and make a blanket statement, but I made a decision long ago that enough of their stuff is crap that I don't need to gamble of finding one of their hidden nuggets of possible goodness. Simply put, there's better stuff out there.
 
bandphan

bandphan

Banned
So if Yamaha, Denon, Pioneer are for noobs, Sony is professional gear or just complete poop? :)

Anyway, I'm not wanting to know on Sony on general, what do you think of this specific reciever (STR-DB 830)?
Sony offerings while offering good connectivity features lack many of the ci features the others have.
 
A

allargon

Audioholic General
The title says it all and please, spare me with "Sony makes good batteries so it can't also make good recievers" crap.. And yes, I have no idea whatsoever about recievers, that's why I need your help.
No disrespect meant, but you asked us for our opinions of the receiver. However, you don't want anything negative. I actually own a Sony receiver. I think their low end stuff at 50% below MSRP is not a bad deal at all. Some people like the ES line. My issue with the ES line is that it knocks on the door of higher end Onkyos, Yamahas, Harman Kardon's, Marantz's as well as the lower end of Rotel, NAD, etc.

First things first. You're asking about an extremely old receiver. It has no modern video switching, video processing or upconversion. It even lacks component inputs.

A lot of people have complained about this particular model going into PROTECT mode. Sony and Onkyo both seem to have problems with overheating receivers. I don't know what's up with that.

http://www.audioreview.com/mfr/sony/a-v-receivers/str-db830/PRD_118803_2718crx.aspx

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_6_4/sony-db830-receiver-december-99.html

Now, you originally asked about receivers. That is cool. Receivers are basically units that combine (pre+)amplification, audio processing and AM/FM radio tuning into one box. Obviously, many receivers do more. However, those are the basic requirements. Before we would recommend a receiver to you we would need to know what speakers you have, your listening preferences, your room size and your budget. Please do not even think of buying a receiver before buying speakers--PERIOD. Speakers should determine your receiver requirements not the other way around.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
So if Yamaha, Denon, Pioneer are for noobs, Sony is professional gear or just complete poop? :)

Anyway, I'm not wanting to know on Sony on general, what do you think of this specific reciever (STR-DB 830)?
You may have better luck here for answer to your specific question.

http://www.agoraquest.com/forum.php

I don't think Sony receivers are as bad as people are led to believe. Surely if you google them you will find all kinds of trouble reports but they do have a large user base. I used to have one and I was quite happy with it.
 
Nomo

Nomo

Audioholic Samurai
How much are you looking to spend on this Sony?
Everything comes down to price, doesn't it.
 
Seth=L

Seth=L

Audioholic Overlord
Nomo said:
How much are you looking to spend on this Sony?
Everything comes down to price, doesn't it.
Probably the best response the the OP's question right here.:D

HOW MUCH IS IT?

If it was free or dirt cheap and it works, that's a great deal. I myself have a Sony ES receiver, but like many other Sony receivers (including the STR-DB830) they are a bit behind in terms of flexibility. My receiver came out in post 2000, and it has only one x-over point (and it doesn't even tell me what it is). For a modern 7.1 receiver from Sony's ES line for $800 I find it quite preposterous for it not to have an adjustable x-over for quality bass management. I would not pay more than about $75 for the STR-DB830 for personal use. If I saw it at that price with the current equipment I have now, I would pass on it. It would have to be $40 for me to considering purchasing it at this point.

my2cents
 
Nomo

Nomo

Audioholic Samurai
I would not pay more than about $75 for the STR-DB830 for personal use. If I saw it at that price with the current equipment I have now, I would pass on it. It would have to be $40 for me to considering purchasing it at this point.

my2cents

Agreed. I quick look on Ebay shows the going rate for a used model is around $50. That doesn't speak well for it's popularity.
 
S

Sherardp

Audioholic
I used to be a big fan of Sony AVRS, no longer the case. So much more bang for buck out there. Denon, Pio Elites, Yammies, and the Onkyos. Do your homework and try to score an Onkyo 805 for under 500. check out accessories4less.com
 
S

SpkR newb

Enthusiast
No disrespect meant, but you asked us for our opinions of the receiver. However, you don't want anything negative. I actually own a Sony receiver. I think their low end stuff at 50% below MSRP is not a bad deal at all. Some people like the ES line. My issue with the ES line is that it knocks on the door of higher end Onkyos, Yamahas, Harman Kardon's, Marantz's as well as the lower end of Rotel, NAD, etc.

First things first. You're asking about an extremely old receiver. It has no modern video switching, video processing or upconversion. It even lacks component inputs.

A lot of people have complained about this particular model going into PROTECT mode. Sony and Onkyo both seem to have problems with overheating receivers. I don't know what's up with that.

Now, you originally asked about receivers. That is cool. Receivers are basically units that combine (pre+)amplification, audio processing and AM/FM radio tuning into one box. Obviously, many receivers do more. However, those are the basic requirements. Before we would recommend a receiver to you we would need to know what speakers you have, your listening preferences, your room size and your budget. Please do not even think of buying a receiver before buying speakers--PERIOD. Speakers should determine your receiver requirements not the other way around.
I am going to put my reciever in a room that is 5m x 4m big. I usually listen to rock and I believe that a reciever that is good enough for music is good enough for music. I don't have any speakers yet but I'm thinking of two floorstanding speakers but I'd upgrade it later to 2 floorstanders, 1 center and 2 rear in-wall speakers. I'm thinking of Klipsch as I mostly hear good about them. Is this possible? My budget is around $500 (but if 100$+ makes a big difference, I'll take it) for 2 floor speakers. As it's better to buy speakers first, I'd leave the reciever for a while.. Any recommendations?
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top