BMXTRIX makes some very relevant points, take note…
I would also like to add that, the idea with screen distance is and always has been based on the height of the image. Let me explain;
The horizontal width of a screen (in a Cinema) is the factor that always changes with aspect ratio, not the height of the image, so the optimum viewing distance is a function of that height, hence the angle is used rather then actual height because as that remains constant as you go from a 1:1.85 to a 1:2.35, you would need to move back to encompass the viewing angle…
(Next time you go to the movies, note that it’s the side of the screen (curtains) that changes the aspect ratio and the height of the image remains constant)
Now this is where it becomes interesting, the standard TV, Plasma, LCD or projector, all crop the height to fit within the screen width… You can not change the physical properties of the screen but you can change the image, so that’s why, you see those “black bars” top and bottom; to fit the screen. Now whist the image is squeezed into the available width, the height is smaller in the larger format, thus, smaller image overall, therefore you could move closer to regain that “big screen” effect; as Clint has already mentioned.
That’s why now for all intensive purposes, the screen width is the factor most commonly used to determine viewing distance when using the above devices.
For a rule of thumb; 2x screen width is adequate, i.e. if you have 6' (2 metre) screen width, you would ideally be 12’ (4 metres) back.
The quality of the image also has a major factor on the viewing position… (to a point)
After all is said and done, just like at the movies, some people like to sit at the back row and others move to the front. If you use the above as a guide, you should be within the ball park for some great viewing.
Cheers…
Dapper Dan…