In my search for a new pre/pro (used mainly for HT but also for music), I started to focus on the capability to do video upconversion. After all, it sounds like a good idea to let the pre-pro upconvert everything to HDMI and upscale everything to 1080i for use by my TV (I'll be purchasing one of those as well). That way, I can use just a single connection to the TV and that's it.
During a conversation, someone made the point that I should use component rather than HDMI between the pre/pro and TV since using HDMI utilizes the TVs digital/analog converters whereas the component output utilizes the pre/pro's DA converters (and that the pre/pro would be more likely to have a better DAC). I infer from that comment that the HDMI signal is digital while the component signal is analog. Is that a correct assumption?
To add to my confusion, don't source components (DVD players, et al) *also* do upconversion and/or scaling?
If that is the case, the other question begging for an answer is which DAC is (generally) better - the source component, the pre/pro or the TV? I understand that "it depends on which pre/pro, component and TV" is the most likely answer, but how can I determine if this is the case (are there certain brands that have good/bad DACs)? Does it make more sense to invest much more in a high-end pre/pro and utilize it's video circuitry or do it at the source or do it at the TV?
Hopefully, I've framed the questions well enough to start a discussion where I can learn something (I'm not necessarily looking for specific component recommendations, but I'm always willing to listen).
Perhaps it's all a moot point since I probably can't tell the difference anyway, but I am curious. I figure that even if I can't tell the difference now, some source material will come along in the future and make it glaringly obvious.
Thanks.