anamorphic96 said:
But my question stems around my downloads from Emusic.com. They encode everything using a VBR MP3. The files end up around 190ish to over 200 kbps. But once I have them in Itunes I can then convert them to Apple Lossles. So in doing this am improving the sound with this format. Didnt think you could do this with purchased MP3's.
No, you would not be improving the sound.
A quick primer on lossy vs lossless codecs:
Lossy codecs (mp3, wma, aac, etc) use 'perceptual coding'; in layman's terms what they do is examine the uncompressed data and compare it to a model of human hearing to determine which parts we can hear and which parts we would not (eg. a soft sound that immediately precedes or follows a loud sound is 'masked' by the loud sound and would not be heard - so it is discarded). That is how they achieve a reduction in file size.
You can decompress a lossy format file back to an uncompressed format, like WAV (essentially PCM with a header preceding it that contains details about the file like number of channels, sampling frequency, bit depth, etc) but the decompressed file is NOT the same as the original from which it was made.
So for your question, if emusic ripped a track from a CD and then transcoded it to MP3 and you were to convert it back to WAV, the result would NOT be identical to the original track. [The theory is that it would
sound the same, but I don't want to debate that.]
Lossless codecs on the other hand, simply compress the data to a smaller size - nothing is discarded. It is analogous to using WinZip to compress a file to make it smaller (although the algorithm is different). When you decompress a lossless file, the result is bit for bit identical to the original.