M

mathman

Enthusiast
Hi,

heard the above captioned speakers a few time and really enjoy them. they were driven by a ARCAM pre/pro system (not sure which model) but given $ constraints it is not possible for the same pre/pro setup. So any ideas on a AV system that could drive these speakers that would cost in the $2-3K area? FYI, the room we're looking at is rather large. For example, is a quality Denon system in that price range able to make the Vandersteens sound as good as the ARCAM?

thank you for your help!
 
Seth=L

Seth=L

Audioholic Overlord
You have $2-3K to spend on components, not speakers included right?

Is it going to be an HT setup or a music setup?

If it is a HT setup will you be using it for music and HT and which will you being do more of?
 
M

mathman

Enthusiast
we have $2-3K for the AV reciever and we want it to have great music abilities as well as HT. We listen to music more than movies but hey we want it all...........
 
Seth=L

Seth=L

Audioholic Overlord
What kind of display are you using?
What are your sources?
Do you need HDMI?
Do you have other speakers and a subwoofer already or plan to purchase?(speakers should always come first;))

If you answer these few questions I can get you on the right track for a receiver or possibly seperates depending on what you need.:)
 
M

mathman

Enthusiast
the display is still in question (not sure i like clarity, brightness of projectors at least the ones we can afford)

the center and surround speakers are still in question. more concerned with the fronts as they will play double duty with the main music and HT speakers.

honestly i'm not sure about the HDMI issue. I've seen a lot of discussion about the subject and it seems like everyone says you should have it but i dont know the difference between switching and not-switching......If we're going to spend 2-3k for a receiver it would be nice to have it be able to deal with future changes in the market place.......
 
Seth=L

Seth=L

Audioholic Overlord
I am going to suggest waiting just a tad longer for one of these.

Onkyo TX-SR805

Or maybe just a bit longer more for the TX-SR875 or TX-NR905.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Swerd

Swerd

Audioholic Warlord
mathman

You gonna love those Vandersteen 2ces:)! They are the champions at imaging.

If you are thinking of spending 2-3 kilo bucks for a receiver, look into the B&K AVR505 or AVR 507. I'm not sure what their price is now, but I think it is in your range. B&K's separate preamp/processors and amplifiers are among the best at any price. They make all their products in the US and their customer service is excellent.

I'm told that their AV receivers share most if not all of their pre/pro features with B&K's top of the line preamp/processor, the Reference 50. That alone makes the B&K recievers a great deal.

The receiver's amps are rated at a conservative 150 watts/channel - plenty for your Vandersteens. If you later add an external amp (a 2-channel amp for example) you can have the receiver's internal power supply altered so that all the power goes to drive the other remaining channels.

The unique and useful features of these models are too many to list here, but they include the ability to equalize bass response in the 20-200 Hz range. There is an internal tone generator that produces individual bass frequencies, letting you measure in-room response with an SPL meter. With knowledge where the worst bass peaks are, you can then construct customized notch filters with definable frequencies, width, and amplitude to filter out the peaks and level out in-room bass response. Although other competing models may have similar features, I have never seen another system that worked so well at bass management.

True, they lack HDMI swithching. Most hi end producers do lag behind the major Japanese manufacturers in the very latest features. But HDMI switching is all about convenience and has nothing to do with quality sound.
 
Seth=L

Seth=L

Audioholic Overlord
True, they lack HDMI swithching. Most hi end producers do lag behind the major Japanese manufacturers in the very latest features. But HDMI switching is all about convenience and has nothing to do with quality sound.
Not so fast, you have to consider 7.1 discrete with LPCM or better Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD. They are offering better audio features on newer receivers.:)
 
W

warpdrive

Full Audioholic
True, they lack HDMI swithching. Most hi end producers do lag behind the major Japanese manufacturers in the very latest features. But HDMI switching is all about convenience and has nothing to do with quality sound.
Not so fast, you have to consider 7.1 discrete with LPCM or better Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD. They are offering better audio features on newer receivers.:)
The newest upper Onkyos (875/905) also go beyond simple HDMI switching and HD audio decoding, they can also improve your picture too with the latest HQV Reon video processor (should beat most internal processors and rivals some standalone ones)
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top