UK Inquiry to be launched into 4,400 Percent Increase in Girls Seeking to Transgender in a Decade.

[TLS Guy]

Penny Mordaunt, the Minister for Women and Equalities, wants to understand the reasons behind a 4,400 per cent increase in girls being referred for transitioning treatment in the past decade.

All I can say is I told you so, since all this nonsense started.

I have long felt that sex reassignment is unethical and should be outlawed, especially for children.

This whole gender dysphoria is a vile symptom of the amoral modern world.

 

[lovinthehd]

Who did you rant to initially? So how do you feel about homosexuals? Are they also a "vile symptom of the amoral modern world"? I tend to think of abhorrent politics of war, racism, misogynism, evangelism and fascism to be the most vile symptoms of the amoral modern world. Sexual identity not so big a deal. Your link doesn't work btw.

 

[TLS Guy]

Who did you rant to initially? So how do you feel about homosexuals? Are they also a "vile symptom of the amoral modern world"? I tend to think of abhorrent politics of war, racism, misogynism, evangelism and fascism to be the most vile symptoms of the amoral modern world. Sexual identity not so big a deal. Your link doesn't work btw.

Thanks for pointing out the failed link. It is corrected. No idea what went wrong.

Giving powerful hormones and rearranging the sexual anatomy of the young is in no way equivalent to homosexual activity. Children are highly suggestible and tend to act with a herd mentality, especially when you throw social media into the mix.

Sorry, but we are heading into a grim harvest with this one.

 

[lovinthehd]

The link is still only so useful without registering for that site so still don't have much information to go on. Thanks for the clarification on your not linking transsexualism and homosexualism. Herd mentality is not limited to children by any means, tho, and could be the medical professionals as well.

 

[Drunkpenguin]

I can see how letting kids transgender might seem strange and maybe a tad on the wrong side, but I would never tell an individual or a family what they should or should not do. For adults? I could care less. Wanna become a girl, go for it. Wanna be gay, have fun. I live by one code that if everyone else lived by the world would be a better place. Dont worry what your neighbors are doing. Its none of our business and doesn't even effect us anyways.

 

[TLS Guy]

I can see how letting kids transgender might seem strange and maybe a tad on the wrong side, but I would never tell an individual or a family what they should or should not do. For adults? I could care less. Wanna become a girl, go for it. Wanna be gay, have fun. I live by one code that if everyone else lived by the world would be a better place. Dont worry what your neighbors are doing. Its none of our business and doesn't even effect us anyways.

That's exactly the daft spineless thinking that panders to loony loud mouthed minorities that is creating all kinds of grief. And I can tell you one thing I sure as hell do not want to pay for the idiocy, which we all are now.

We had the absolute height of this lunacy in the UK just a few days ago.

An idiotic criminal transgendering to female, but still possessing his offending organ, was convicted of a crime. Thanks to the loony left, and yes they are daft, you by law can choose to go to the prison of the gender "you identify" with. Well this tosser of a bloke went to a female prison as per his own self report of being female. Before you could say "Jack Robinson" the tosser had raped several fellow female inmates with penetration with said offending organ..

I'm glad to say that this looser is now languishing in a male prison where I trust his fellow inmates are meeting out his just deserts.

Here is a comment from a chap who has already sacrificed his offending organ. Actually I have a more descriptive for this type of mutilation. Anyhow this is what he wrote in response to this article.

Gussy Scrotch 16 Sep 2018 2:01PM

I'm transgender and a mature adult.

Yet I am profoundly against this irreversible gender identifying in children. Obviously I'm all for the trans agenda to the effect it makes life more tolerable for people like me in the same way the gay movement did for gay people.

But I'm afraid I believe it has gone too far with children - there are very rare cases where a young child can sufficiently display obvious and clear symptoms they are genuinely trans. But the vast majority of these children in this vast increase are probably not, in my opinion, genuinely trans - they are still exploring life and all its weird spectrum as thrust down their throat in the current tsunami of pro-LGBT propaganda.

Hell, as a child I wanted to be in the mafia cos I secretly saw The Godfather and thought it was "cool". Young minds are too malleable and too easily swayed the 'wrong' way for completely the wrong reasons. Of course some child who is unsure of his/her gender identity at a young age is going to jump on a label if it fits at that time - only to find several years later they have changed their whole mindset to quite the opposite.

By all means please keep public awareness of the issue alive, but this almost pro-active seeking out of trans children in schools is just too far. Genuine trans people, in the right social environment, will naturally emerge as they approach maturity and they can then seek out the help they need. At the moment it seems as if children are being actively plucked out just to fill an LGBT quota.

I fear things like this are doing more harm than good to the trans movement.

Make no mistake we are on the road to Bedlam.

 

[Alex2507]

letting kids transgender might seem strange and maybe a tad on the wrong side

Letting kids get their ears pierced is where I draw the line. No mutilations whatsoever. You already have a piercing? Well you ain't gonna wear an earring cause I'm taking it out of your head. Which part of NO don't you get? The 'N' or the 'O'?

After 18? Fine. It's kind of an arbitrary age and I could sway to 16 on some stuff and argue for 21 on other things but 18 seems like a good # for things like piercings and tats. I think I like 21 as a good age to be able to chop off your own prick.

My niece wants to be my nephew. Being a lesbian wasn't enough. At least she's 22 or so. All I know is that she has to be whatever the opposite of content is, to be doing that. Here I thought my life had its hardships.

 

[TLS Guy]

Letting kids get their ears pierced is where I draw the line. No mutilations whatsoever. You already have a piercing? Well you ain't gonna wear an earring cause I'm taking it out of your head. Which part of NO don't you get? The 'N' or the 'O'?

After 18? Fine. It's kind of an arbitrary age and I could sway to 16 on some stuff and argue for 21 on other things but 18 seems like a good # for things like piercings and tats. I think I like 21 as a good age to be able to chop off your own prick.

My niece wants to be my nephew. Being a lesbian wasn't enough. At least she's 22 or so. All I know is that she has to be whatever the opposite of content is, to be doing that. Here I thought my life had its hardships.

You see this is where it gets confusing. Is she going to say she is a male homosexual and bed men, or continue to bed women. In which case why the mutilation. There was a case a year or so ago in the UK when there was no disclosure. A former female dated and beded a non Lesbian woman without disclosure. The heterosexual woman freaked and went to the police. The trans was arrested and subsequently convicted of sexual assault and got a pretty stiff prison sentence. I would think more likely than not US jurisprudence would take a similar stance.

This whole thing is just a mess and we should never have opened this Pandora's box.

 

[Alex2507]

You see this is where it gets confusing. Is she going to say she is a male homosexual and bed men, or continue to bed women. In which case why the mutilation. There was a case a year or so ago in the UK when there was no disclosure. A former female dated and beded a non Lesbian woman without disclosure. The heterosexual woman freaked and went to the police. The trans was arrested and subsequently convicted of sexual assault and got a pretty stiff prison sentence. I would think more likely than not US jurisprudence would take a similar stance.

This whole thing is just a mess and we should never have opened this Pandora's box.

I'll be sure to check with her about how she feels about potentially becoming a rapist.

This is an interesting and for me, informative presentation:


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[TLS Guy]

I'll be sure to check with her about how she feels about potentially becoming a rapist.

This is an interesting and for me, informative presentation:


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Yes, it is interesting until we get to the summing up, which is a thinly veiled argument for anything goes. Of course that is the road to chaos and confusion.

The very rare metabolic endocrine syndromes are very rare and have nothing to do with the now comparatively vast numbers of people wanting to transgender compared to years gone by. The issue is clearly becoming manipulated by those with nefarious plans and I suspect on occasion malice afore thought.

I have quizzed numerous members of my generation and also corresponded with school colleagues. I have asked them if they recall any pupil confused about their gender in any way, including this modern curious notion of choosing a percentage female and male in their make up. In other words, the classic case of "having your cake and eating it to". Not one can. Yet, it is now a common issue for all of our grandchildren. I do not believe for one moment it was concealed before. There has been active encouragement.

Lastly I will tell one story from just one of my grandchildren. There are others.

When my son Churchill, named after the great man himself by my son in law was in second grade he exhibited the sense and courage of his namesake.

His class was called together by teacher and headmistress to tell them that a Somali female student identified as male. The class were instructed to call this pupil he rather then she under threat of discipline. He protested there and then that this could not be as he stated that the girl in question could not be a boy as she was wearing the Somali girl's uniform! Whether the girls parents, knew or consented to this I know not. However being Muslim I highly doubt they were. I have a strong suspicion that the student in question my well have been motivated in this to shed the Muslim garb and had also figured out that the males got the better end of the stick in their culture.

Anyhow Churchill bucked the trend, and I helped him fiercely defend his corner. To be honest I was outraged.
In any event he ended up having to move schools over the row, which was probably a good thing in many ways in the event.

Lastly that great bastion of liberal thought is considering the use of the "gender neutral"ze when addressing students and staff. As usual with the left under pain of heavy discipline. After inciting justifiable outrage I think this is quietly going to the back burner, but you never know.

 

[Alex2507]

it is interesting until we get to the summing up, which is a thinly veiled argument for anything goes.

I'll have to watch it again. I was so impressed with her that I didn't give thought to her possible agenda.

The very rare metabolic endocrine syndromes are very rare and have nothing to do with the now comparatively vast numbers of people wanting to transgender compared to years gone by.

I would agree with that while still looking to the folks with letters behind their names to learn more about what can be done for people with the rare disorders (if you can call having extra parts a disorder nowadays).

 

[TLS Guy]

I'll have to watch it again. I was so impressed with her that I didn't give thought to her possible agenda.



I would agree with that while still looking to the folks with letters behind their names to learn more about what can be done for people with the rare disorders (if you can call having extra parts a disorder nowadays).

Those are disorders alright. The old traditional wisdom was to make them all female anatomically as it is technically the easiest thing to do. We know now that is the wrong answer and not correct. Decision has to come after a period of observation and consultation.