I wonder if the people funding these garbage lawsuits realize that (due to the sanctions) their money actually goes into the pockets of the lawyers representing the defendants.
Here's an article that was cited by the judge in the sanctions order:
>>>Former President Donald Trump wasted no time seeking a fundraising boost off the heels of his
lawsuits against Facebook, Google, and Twitter, with the Republican National Committee sending out emails and texts soliciting donations within minutes of the announcement.<<<
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-announces-lawsuits-against-facebook-165441829.html
This is just one example. The sanctions order lists many more instances of the exact same pattern of filing lawsuits and immediately soliciting donations.
www.documentcloud.org
Notice that Trump and Habba are jointly and severally liable for the $1 million:
View attachment 59732
What this means is that Trump and Habba will likely have to fight each other over who pays.
>>>When two or more parties are
jointly and severally liable for a tortious act, each party is independently liable for the full extent of the injuries stemming from the tortious act. Thus, if a
plaintiff wins a money judgment against the parties collectively, the
plaintiff may collect the full value of the judgment from any one of them. That party may then seek
contribution from the other wrong-doers. This concept of choosing the defendant(s) from whom to collect damages is called the law of indivisible injury. . . . For example suppose that A, B, and C
negligently injure V. V successfully sues A, B, and C, for $1,000,000. If the court used a joint and several liability system, V could demand that A pay V the full $1,000,000. A could them demand
contribution from B and C. However, if B or C could not pay, A would be stuck paying the full $1,000,000.<<<
www.law.cornell.edu
It's a snake eat snake world.