Does that matter if they don't break down or shorten the life of the components? No, not at all. I know some will argue it *has* to shorten the life since heat is the biggest killer of electronics, but I tend to take the internet with a grain of salt. For every 1 user that comes on the web to complain, there are probably 3-4 on and off the web that have no problems. Not to mention the people who improperly run the components or don't properly ventilate it.
Yes, but running hot will shorten the life of the components, shorten life and decrease reliability.
All semiconductor devices have a life temp. curve. It is in the spec. of all devices. The curves are never linear, with failures increasing to the log of the operating temperature. So running hot in and of itself is a big negative in any piece of electronic equipment.
The poster Cz_the_day on AVS forums, is obviously experienced in electronics circuits.
He has documented having to change caps in these receivers from from 85 C degree max operating temperature to 105 C to avoid failure. As he points out that is hotter then boiling water.
He has documented failure of the IC controlling the HDMI switching due to temperature, which probably explains the high incidence of HDMI board failures in these units.
Now there are concerns about the failure of Denon units. Now I can't get an accurate assessment of market share, but there are a lot more reports about heat and especially HDMI board failure in Onkyo units than problems with other receivers on the NET.
I looked into this as I have fielded an increase in requests for help with HDMI connection problems, which the posters believe to be due to settings errors, unfortunately most of these seem to involve HDMI board failure. The last of these posts was in the previous 24 hours, from a unit two months old. Onkyo units have been disproportionally involved. This last caused me to investigate further.
So I think there is a problem with the current crop of Onkyo receivers. Certainly I'm inclined to steer people away from them for the time being.
Of course the wider issue is that the whole concept of the receiver is fundamentally flawed, which is a part of the problem. With ever increasing complexity and need for ever more feature and more powerful processing it becomes an increasingly flawed idea.
Pioneers decision to use class D amps, which generate less heat by orders of magnitude than conventional amps, may well have merit. However the downside is that the performance of class D amps, but not necessarily reliability can be degraded by speakers with wide swings of impedance and difficult phase angles.
I have said this before, but the industry needs to regroup and put power amps in the speakers with active crossovers. I believe with economy of scale, there would be cost savings and a marked increase in performance and much better performance per dollar.
In my view the receiver becomes a less and less viable option every year.