I'm trying to put together my first system with a few goals in mind:
1) I would like to minimize cost and maximize my listening experience, call it budget audiophile, respecting the law of diminishing returns, whatever - I just don't want to spend $ .01 more than necessary on equipment I don't need/won't use/won't add reasonable value to my listening experience.
2) Music is my #1 priority. I listen to all kinds of music but I would say the genres I listen to most, in order, are: rock, pop, jazz and then some classical. I'm not a big fan of cranking up the bass. That's not to say I don't like bass, I just like it to be balanced and clean. That said, Almost all of my music is mp3 (256 - 320 kbps.) It's all bought from online stores (zune, amazon, itunes, etc) so quality wise it's as good/consistent as it gets for MP3 (at least for the amount of effort I am willing to put into it.)
3) Movies/TV is secondary - I am assuming that if a system does a good job with music I will be reasonably satisfied with movies/TV.
4) I would like a system that is capable of playing music that can be heard throughout my main floor (average sized living, dining, kitchen, family rooms - ~ 1200 sq feet.) It doesn't have to be able to blow your hair back 3 rooms away but I would like it to be loud enough to be enjoyed while washing dishes, throwing a dinner parties, bb-qing in the backyard with the windows open, etc)
3) I would also like to do some focused/critical listening – I’d like to spend some time sitting in the sweet spot with a drink in my hand and one of my favorite albums playing. Clarity and quality is important to me - I would like the experience to be as natural/neutral as possible. I don't know that I wouldn't go so far as to call myself an audiophile (only because I know I will be told off if I do so, considering my budget) but I would like to remove equipment limitations/distractions from the equation, as much as reasonably possible, considering my data source and budget.
4) My primary, and potentially sole, source of data will be a Windows Media Center PC. I may add a game console but don't see having more than 2 or 3 devices - I expect all will be connected via hdmi.
5) I would like the setup to be reasonably pleasing to the eye. I don't want anything that looks cheap or too "unique"
All of that said here is what I am looking at, equipment wise:
- Paradigm atom OR mini monitor OR Titan speakers (5 in total)
- HSU STF-1 OR STF-2 Subwoofer
- Marantz nr1601 OR Onkyo HT-RC260 receiver
Speakers - again, I don't want to spend a penny more than necessary - Is paradigm the way to go? If I'm using a sub and set the crossover correctly will the atoms be as good as, or at least close to, the minis and titans? If not, which speakers would you choose and why (considering I will be primarily listening to high quality MP3s)?
Sub - does the additional range and power of the STF-2 justify the cost? Considering my source (primarily high quality MP3s) and speakers would the STF-2 be wasted money, in the sense I would never realize the true benefit without moving up to a more powerful set of speakers?
Receiver - I expect all of my source(s) will be HDMI and don't expect to go upgrade crazy anytime soon - I want to maximize sound quality in stereo and deliver good 5.1 when watching movies, tv. I also want to get as much out of my speakers as possible and minimize feature bloat I know I'll never use. The one exception I would call out is support for HDMI 1.4a - I would like the option of going 3D one day and really like the idea of HDMI pass-through. I am also assuming that if all of my sources are HDMI then video up scaling is irrelevant as it won’t happen/isn’t necessary.
If you get the impression I am over thinking this you are probably right but I'm really trying to avoid second guessing myself down the road. When all is said and done I just want to enjoy the music.
Cheers,
Audiofledgling