Stonehenge revealed.

Tomorrow

Tomorrow

Audioholic Ninja
So it looks like it was just a big ol' burial ground, after all.

----------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON — England's enigmatic Stonehenge served as a burial ground from its earliest beginnings and for several hundred years thereafter, new research indicates.

Dating of cremated remains shows burials took place as early as 3000 B.C., when the first ditches around the monument were being built, researchers said Thursday.

And those burials continued for at least 500 years, when the giant stones that mark the mysterious circle were being erected, they said.

"It's now clear that burials were a major component of Stonehenge in all its main stages," said Mike Parker Pearson, archaeology professor at the University of Sheffield in England and head of the Stonehenge Riverside Archaeological Project.

• Click here to visit FOXNews.com's Archaeology Center.

In the past many archaeologists had thought that burials at Stonehenge continued for only about a century, the researchers said.

"Stonehenge was a place of burial from its beginning to its zenith in the mid third millennium B.C. The cremation burial dating to Stonehenge's sarsen stones phase is likely just one of many from this later period of the monument's use and demonstrates that it was still very much a domain of the dead," Parker Pearson said in a statement.

RelatedStories
Vandals Damage Stonehenge With Hammer Archaeologists Begin Dig at Stonehenge Australian Man Begins Work on Stonehenge Replica Stonehenge Revelers Celebrate Summer Solstice Prehistoric British Village Found Near Stonehenge Photo Essays
Stonehenge Excavation The researchers also excavated homes nearby at Durrington Walls, which they said appeared to be seasonal homes related to Stonehenge.

"It's a quite extraordinary settlement, we've never seen anything like it before," Parker Pearson said.

The village appeared to be a land of the living and Stonehenge a land of the ancestors, he said.

There were at least 300 and perhaps as many as 1,000 homes in the village, he said. The small homes were occupied in midwinter and midsummer.

The village also included a circle of wooden pillars, which they have named the Southern Circle. It is oriented toward the midwinter sunrise, the opposite of Stonehenge, which is oriented to the midsummer sunrise.

The research was supported by the National Geographic Society, which discusses Stonehenge in its June magazine and will feature the new burial data on National Geographic Channel on Sunday.

The researchers said the earliest cremation burial was a small group of bones and teeth found in pits called the Aubrey Holes and dated to 3030-2880 B.C., about the time with the first ditch-and-bank monument was being built.

Remains from the surrounding ditch included an adult dated to 2930-2870 B.C., and the most recent cremation, Parker Pearson said, comes from the ditch's northern side and was of a 25-year-old woman. It dated to 2570-2340 B.C., around the time the first arrangements of large sarsen stones appeared at Stonehenge.

According to Parker Pearson's team, this is the first time any of the cremation burials from Stonehenge have been radiocarbon dated. The burials dated by the group were excavated in the 1950s and have been kept at the nearby Salisbury Museum.

In the 1920s an additional 49 cremation burials were dug up at Stonehenge, but all were reburied because they were thought to be of no scientific value, the researchers said.

They estimate that up to 240 people were buried within Stonehenge, all as cremation deposits.

Team member Andrew Chamberlain suggested that that the cremation burials represent the natural deaths of a single elite family and its descendants, perhaps a ruling dynasty.

A clue to this, he said, is the small number of burials in Stonehenge's earliest phase, a number that grows larger in subsequent centuries, as offspring would have multiplied.

Parker Pearson added: "I don't think it was the common people getting buried at Stonehenge — it was clearly a special place at that time. One has to assume anyone buried there had some good credentials."

The actual building and purpose of Stonehenge remain a mystery that has long drawn speculation from many sources.
 
aberkowitz

aberkowitz

Audioholic Field Marshall
I gotta say, I was totally unimpressed by my visit there. It's a really cool thing to see and take pictures of, for about 20 minutes. Then you realize- "That's all I get to see. I'm in the middle of nowhere, and there are 50 vendors trying to sell me tourist $hit!" It's also not as big as I thought it would be. There was just somehting underwhelming about the whole visit.

As for the burial stuff, that's really cool. It's amazing that they can accurately "date" an adult from up to 5000 years ago!
 
mtrycrafts

mtrycrafts

Seriously, I have no life.
So it looks like it was just a big ol' burial ground, after all.

----------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON —

The actual building and purpose of Stonehenge remain a mystery that has long drawn speculation from many sources.
Maybe they just built it on that burial site? If it is not in conjunction with the burial process, then it would seem just two distinct events, an old burial site and then the Stonehenge.
 
jliedeka

jliedeka

Audioholic General
I think that's still a bit of an assumption. If it was a really important religious site, it stands to reason that people would want to be buried there. That doesn't mean it was primarily a cemetery.

I'm still betting on alien landing site. :D

Jim
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top