Speaker Specs? - Help!

D

DSLO

Enthusiast
Hi. What is the best way to tell a good speaker in terms of reading the specs. I realize that listening to speakers in the store is the best barometer, and taste varies between the user, etc. What can you do when choosing between different speakers that all seem pretty good. Is frequency response a good spec to check? If so, can you explain how the ranges are understood (i.e. is 40Hz - 27KHz better than 69Hz - 18KHz)? I'm looking for some decent quality (but inexpensive) bookshelf speakers (Polk, JBL, Yamaha) to add to my current system. Nothing crazy. Thanks for the help. Be nice, I'm not a genius when it comes to this stuff.
 
L

Leprkon

Audioholic General
DSLO said:
Hi. If so, can you explain how the ranges are understood (i.e. is 40Hz - 27KHz better than 69Hz - 18KHz)?
Be nice, I'm not a genius when it comes to this stuff.
the number to look for is on the low end. you really want your mains to reach down to about 50 Hz, even though you will probably set your crossover a littl ehigher than that.

You want to make sure there is an overlap between your sub and your mains, and 50 usually assures this.

the high end number might impress people to read it, but the sad truth is human hearing basically ends at 18 KHz, and for most people over the age of nine, it stops at 13 KHz.

another measure of quality is the sensitivity. you would like to see a minimum number of 89 dB, otherwise your receiver will be working very hard to pump out the volume you want.

the lower end of the bookshelf speaker market is probably the most hotly contested area in electronics right now. :) You can actually get some really great deals in this arena from better names.

this one is particular will be hard to beat:

http://www.av123.com/products_product.php?section=speakers&product=1.1

here's another set for under a hundred:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=5335693&type=product&id=1051806301325

you can also get some really great deals on the bic america speakers

http://www.thetwistergroup.com/product/DV-62SIB D00804.html

the old standby's like Infinity and Polk Audio can be good finds if you take the time to look for good prices.
 
Buckeyefan 1

Buckeyefan 1

Audioholic Ninja
It's more than just specs

Lep is right, but I would even suggest looking for spl's in the low to mid 90's if possible. Polks are rated at 89 to 90 and require big power to drive them. Not good if you have a sub $700 receiver. You won't hear what the Polks can reproduce with a lack of power. You'll rarely ever see speakers rated below 20,000Hz, but you will see a lot of variation from 20Hz to 100Hz. Those numbers only mean something if they are rated at +/-3dB. A manufacturer that claims a speaker is rated from 30-20,000Hz and doesn't differentiate the dB level isn't telling you the 30Hz figure may not be attainable until the speakers are driven to their limits and possibly distorting the higher frequencies. The +/-3dB figure allows for all drivers to reproduce these frequencies at a similar level. Keep in mind that a horn tweeter will sound totally different than a ribbon tweeter or soft dome tweeter, even though they may have similar specs. Two 5.25" mids will sound different than 1 6.5" midbass driver. The midrange is totally lost in the frequency response specs, but it's probably the most important aspect of sound reproduction. Finally, don't let specs fool you. There are the "white van" style speakers out there on ebay with impressive specs. What they don't have are the all important high end crossovers which keep your tweeter from reproducing mid bass and your woofer reproducing a female's voice. They also don't have the build quality or driver quality of the better known brands. The best bet is to demo as many as you can. You'll start to see a pattern of brands you like and ones you hate.
 
shokhead

shokhead

Audioholic General
I think the spl is pretty important when looking for speakers.
 
shokhead

shokhead

Audioholic General
Leprkon said:
the number to look for is on the low end. you really want your mains to reach down to about 50 Hz, even though you will probably set your crossover a littl ehigher than that.

You want to make sure there is an overlap between your sub and your mains, and 50 usually assures this.

the high end number might impress people to read it, but the sad truth is human hearing basically ends at 18 KHz, and for most people over the age of nine, it stops at 13 KHz.

another measure of quality is the sensitivity. you would like to see a minimum number of 89 dB, otherwise your receiver will be working very hard to pump out the volume you want.

the lower end of the bookshelf speaker market is probably the most hotly contested area in electronics right now. :) You can actually get some really great deals in this arena from better names.

this one is particular will be hard to beat:

http://www.av123.com/products_product.php?section=speakers&product=1.1

here's another set for under a hundred:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=5335693&type=product&id=1051806301325

you can also get some really great deals on the bic america speakers

http://www.thetwistergroup.com/product/DV-62SIB D00804.html

the old standby's like Infinity and Polk Audio can be good finds if you take the time to look for good prices.
Not sur where those numbers are from but i've always read hearing is 20Hz to 20Khz and as you get old,its less.
 
L

Leprkon

Audioholic General
shokhead said:
Not sur where those numbers are from but i've always read hearing is 20Hz to 20Khz and as you get old,its less.
this is true, but while getting 20 Hz from a bookshelf is possible, the midrange would really suffer. :( it's better, to me at least, to count on a sub for the 20 to 80-ish range and use the mains from 50-ish on up. :)
 
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
Good points Lep but ya slipped up on a couple.

Leprkon said:
the high end number might impress people to read it, but the sad truth is human hearing basically ends at 18 KHz, and for most people over the age of nine, it stops at 13 KHz.


another measure of quality is the sensitivity. you would like to see a minimum number of 89 dB, otherwise your receiver will be working very hard to pump out the volume you want.

the lower end of the bookshelf speaker market is probably the most hotly contested area in electronics right now. :) You can actually get some really great deals in this arena from better names.

this one is particular will be hard to beat:

http://www.av123.com/products_product.php?section=speakers&product=1.1

here's another set for under a hundred:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=5335693&type=product&id=1051806301325

you can also get some really great deals on the bic america speakers

http://www.thetwistergroup.com/product/DV-62SIB D00804.html

the old standby's like Infinity and Polk Audio can be good finds if you take the time to look for good prices.
At the ripe old age of 18 and 19, I was walking away with headaches out the electronics labs because I could here the 18KHz wine of the old oscilloscopes. I think most nine year olds can still hear close to 20KHz. I tested my daughters hearing 13, and 11, and they both rolled off at 19KHz. I on the other hand could barely hear 13KHz. I hope I don't loose much more.

Sensitivity has no bearing what so ever on quality. PSB's stratus Mini's are inefficient with senstivities around the 87db mark. Pitting them against the highly sensitive Axioms and athenas is a non contest. But I do agree with you that its important to get a fairly senstive speaker when mating them to lower power receivers or to receivers driving speakers in a large room
 
shokhead

shokhead

Audioholic General
Leprkon said:
this is true, but while getting 20 Hz from a bookshelf is possible, the midrange would really suffer. :( it's better, to me at least, to count on a sub for the 20 to 80-ish range and use the mains from 50-ish on up. :)
So a good set of boolshelfs would have a range of what, 50Hz-60Hz?
Name a couple that you think would fall in here. I'm starting to think upgrade next year and would like 4 bookshelfs alike for mains and surrounds.
 
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
PSB Stratus Minis jump to mind

shokhead said:
So a good set of boolshelfs would have a range of what, 50Hz-60Hz?
Name a couple that you think would fall in here. I'm starting to think upgrade next year and would like 4 bookshelfs alike for mains and surrounds.
as well as PSB"s Platinum's M2.

Paradisgm's S2 ..


there are others
 
S

silversurfer

Senior Audioholic
3db said:
as well as PSB"s Platinum's M2.
The Platinum M2's are VERY nice. Not inexpensive either, but oh so sweet.

Leprkon said:
another measure of quality is the sensitivity. you would like to see a minimum number of 89 dB, otherwise your receiver will be working very hard to pump out the volume you want.
I disagree. There are a number of high quality speakers that are less efficient. With such speakers, you need more clean power to drive them. Speakers designed with higher efficiency, can be driven nicely with lower power amps, relatively speaking. Tradeoffs are usually apparent in the bass area if all things are equal.
 
Shadow_Ferret

Shadow_Ferret

Audioholic Chief
I tend to disagree on the SPL number, too. I've heard NHTs and they sound so sweet, but are rated only at 86 spl.
 
Rock&Roll Ninja

Rock&Roll Ninja

Audioholic Field Marshall
heres a question:

I can burn a 20KHz sine wave tone onto a CD-R, and hear it on my system. Does this mean I can hear 20KHz, or is my actually hearing lower than 20K, but I can't tell it apart from, say 16KHz?
 
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
maybe

Rock&Roll Ninja said:
heres a question:

I can burn a 20KHz sine wave tone onto a CD-R, and hear it on my system. Does this mean I can hear 20KHz, or is my actually hearing lower than 20K, but I can't tell it apart from, say 16KHz?

If the software that is generating the 20KHz wave that you burn on to your CDR is fairly accurate, I would say that you are hearing 20KHz.. But careful with the volume levels so that you don't damage your hearing.
 
D

DSLO

Enthusiast
Ok. Thanks for all the feedback. Most of it's over my head, but I'm not really that lost :rolleyes:

Here's the list of speakers I'm looking at. Any additional feedback is appreciated.

Polk Speakers
Bookshelf * 2-Way/6.5" Woofer * 125 Watts per Channel * 1 Low Frequency Driver - Model RTI6B - $380 pair

Polk Speakers
Bookshelf * 2-Way/5.25" Woofer * 125 Watts per Channel * 1 Low Frequency Driver - Model RTI4B - $260 pair

Polk Speakers
Bookshelf * 2-Way/5.25" Woofer * 125 Watts per Channel * 2 Low Frequency Drivers - Model MONITOR40B - $250 pair

Polk Speakers
Bookshelf * 2-Way/5.25" Woofer * 100 Watts per Channel * 1 Low Frequency Driver - Model ATRIUM45W - $200 pair

JBL Speakers
Bookshelf * 2-Way/5" Woofer * 100 Watts per Channel * 1 Low Frequency Driver - Model NRE20 - $200 pair

Yamaha Speakers
Bookshelf * 2-Way/5" Woofer * 150 Watts per Channel * 1 Low Frequency Driver - Model NS333 - $200 pair

Polk Speakers
Bookshelf * 2-Way/5.25" Woofer * 100 Watts per Channel * 1 Low Frequency Driver - Model ATRIUM45B - $200 pair

JBL Speakers
Bookshelf * 2-Way/4" Woofer * 100 Watts per Channel * 1 Low Frequency Driver - Model NRE10CH - $180 pair

:confused:
 
Buckeyefan 1

Buckeyefan 1

Audioholic Ninja
You really can't go wrong with Polk. The RTi series use better drivers than the Monitor series. I took apart my RTi4's this past weekend, and the 5.25" woofer's magnet is as large as the woofer itself. The crossover is huge. I was very impressed by the build quality. Most small bookshelves with 5.25" woofers don't have dual 5 way binding posts. These do. I liked the RTi4's mid bass better than the RTi6's, but I use them for surround. If you are using them for fronts, you may prefer the larger RTi6. Now I haven't compared the Monitor 40 to the RTi's side by side. That may be a good comparison since the Monitor has dual woofers for a lower price. You just may not get the higher build quality or drivers. Specs are very close. I would say the Yamaha and JBL are a distant second to either Polks IMO. Don't forget, there are other options our there for less money. You may still be able to get your hands on some Athena AS-B2's from Best Buy or BIC DV62's at yahoo shopping. Both IMO sound as good as my RTi bookshelves and are much more affordable (not paying for the Polk name).
 
D

DSLO

Enthusiast
Thanks for the advice Buckeyefan. I was just doing some research on the Polk website (and others). The reason why I listed the speakers above is because I know someone that can get me a deal here in NY at a reputable electronics retailer. I always buy my stuff there. They basically carry the bookshelf speakers listed. I know Polk is good quality. I can probably get the speakers at about $75-$100 less than list price. It's funny that you just got back on the recommendation because the next question was going to be between the RTI's and Monitor series. PS - The speakers will be used for surround. The Monitor series looks nice, specs are similar, but the RTI's seem like better quality. Thanks again for the help.
 
shokhead

shokhead

Audioholic General
Buckeyefan 1 said:
You really can't go wrong with Polk. The RTi series use better drivers than the Monitor series. I took apart my RTi4's this past weekend, and the 5.25" woofer's magnet is as large as the woofer itself. The crossover is huge. I was very impressed by the build quality. Most small bookshelves with 5.25" woofers don't have dual 5 way binding posts. These do. I liked the RTi4's mid bass better than the RTi6's, but I use them for surround. If you are using them for fronts, you may prefer the larger RTi6. Now I haven't compared the Monitor 40 to the RTi's side by side. That may be a good comparison since the Monitor has dual woofers for a lower price. You just may not get the higher build quality or drivers. Specs are very close. I would say the Yamaha and JBL are a distant second to either Polks IMO. Don't forget, there are other options our there for less money. You may still be able to get your hands on some Athena AS-B2's from Best Buy or BIC DV62's at yahoo shopping. Both IMO sound as good as my RTi bookshelves and are much more affordable (not paying for the Polk name).
I wonder how the Axiom M22ti's stack up to those?
 
S

silversurfer

Senior Audioholic
shokhead said:
I wonder how the Axiom M22ti's stack up to those?
The M22 stacks up very well. Nice and balanced, maybe a bit forward for some, but when the volume gets loud, the metal tweeter loses its composure. Good mids, no boxiness.
 
Last edited:
Tom Andry

Tom Andry

Speaker of the House
but when the volume gets loud, the metal tweeter loses its composure
How loud? I've had mine as loud as I think most are likely to and didn't experience any "loss of composure"? The Audioholics review didn't indicate anything like what you are describing.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top