Sonos v. Musiccast v. Wired
Great Review. You also appeared to love the Musiccast.
Just purchased my first home and want multi-room music. It is a small, old house with plaster walls (plaster = pain to work with). Not too afraid of in-ceiling speakers and running wiring, but the less I have to impact the plaster the better. Tradeoff of course is in a small house, sunken speakers are "cleaner" and take up less space.
I currently have NO music in MP3 form or otherwise on a harddrive. I do have a computer that I could dedicate to music. Obviously, unless I go the traditional wired route, I'm going to be making the leap to electronic storage. I have about 400 CDs.
Questions: anything you care to say about comparing Musiccast to Sonos to wired (such as Russound A-BUS) in terms of:
- Controls
- fidelity
- ability to drive speakers with the client vs. the zone player vs. amplified russound keypads
- cost
- simplicity
- expandability
Thanks: I know these are enough questions for another article. My main concerns after reviewing and comparing:
- Musiccast: The yamaha clients seem the most limited in their ability to drive speakers. Also, not sure what it would mean for installation if I chose in-ceiling speakers.
- Sonos:given 2x50w and 8ohm nature of the zoneplayer, my "zones" would seem to be limited to 2 speakers. In other words, even if the dining and living room are the same "listening zone", if I needed 4 speakers to fill those spaces with sound (2 in each room), I'd need two zone players. No problem there except for cost. If I went with in-celing, could I put the zone players in the attic? (gets pretty hot up there)
- Wired: seems cheapest (maybe?), simplest. Most installation work. least control in terms of source. Also, couldn't do different sources to different rooms/zones, but don't care about that as much. Its not a very big house.
THANK YOU very much for any guidance.
Michael