Over the weekend I purchased a Denon AVR 688 because it was discounted to $199.99, which I thought was an upgrade from my Kenwood VR606. I have a very low end home theater system which consist of:
2 Bose 301's III series for Front L/R
1 Kenwood Center channel
4 Kenwood Bookshelf speakers of which I am only using two for surround, I could use the other two for 7.1
1 Kenwood 12" powered sub
I may upgrade some speakers in the distant future but I will probably stay with what I have for now.
My TV is a 50" Panasonic 720P Plasma and a Panasonic upconversion DVD player.
One of the things I don't like about the Denon is that it is not very user friendly, I don't mind so much but I think my wife will have a hard time with it.
I thought about sending it back and getting the ONKYO sr tx606 because it is a bit easier to use, processes the audio, and utilizes more audio formats.
My question is this, how important is it to utilize those formats like Dolby TrueHD in the future? Am I really going to get anymore "bang for the buck" switching to a receiver that processes the audio via HDMI? What if I get a Blu Ray player in the future, will I want a better Receiver? I think I already know the answer to my question which is that I probably couldn't tell the difference between Dolby digital and Dolby TrueHD, is this correct?
If you think I should purchase another receiver and take this one back, which would you recommend in the $400 range?
I am very happy with the audio quality of the Denon, it just isn't that easy to use and I'm not sure if I will need more features in the future, I would say my speakers are the limiting factor at this point.
Thanks for your help!