mcwilson said:
I'm not that familiar with your projector. But, my initial reaction is:
"Good Lord, YES! Go with HD!"
I have the InFocus SP7205 and cable, and in general the digital channels are much better than the rest, but HD is stunning! It's jaw-dropping. Football (sports in general) is unbelievable.
Good Luck with the decision.
The thing is, I am already recieving a DIGITAL signal from my sattelite. I did see the huge difference from when i switched from my analog cable. I'm sure that cable's digital channels should be better (than their own analogs) as well.
With your projector (Native: 1280x720 Pixels) any HD should be another large step better, as not only will it display it in that resolution, but it is also native and doesn't have to convert it.
Theoretically my projector is optomized for DVD use with it's native (lower than HD, higher than regular braodcast) resolution.
It might(theoretically?) even display a better image for DVD's than yours as it does not have to upconvert. Your upconverting (of a lower quality than HD) might even make your HD channels look that much better. BUT my projector has to downconvert any higher quality (than DVD) signal, and theoretically (and I'm sure physically) could never acheive the display of yours WITH a higher quality feed.
Now my quandry is...will buying the higher quality HD feed be useless for me due to some degradation in downconverting/compressing??
I'm not sure what resolution my current (standard digital sattelite) feed is but I was assuming it was less than DVD quality. I was thinking that buying the higher quality HD feed and compressing it should STILL be better than my current feed (if my current feed is indeed upscaling..anybody know digital sattelite's feed resolution?). I just don't know by how much if any, and if it's worth it??