3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
I went to the theater last week to see this flick. It was nice to get out of the house. I will definately add this one to my BR collection when its released. Humour, special effects, a mindless plot, and lots of action is always worthy of entertainment. :p
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
I enjoyed the first one, and I am a fan of many of Guy Ritchie's films, so I want to see this one as well.
 
skizzerflake

skizzerflake

Audioholic Field Marshall
I've seen both movies and enjoyed the crash-and-bang FX, along with the humorous characterizations. I also have read a bunch of A C Doyle's Holmes stories. I like the movies as long as I can keep telling myself that there's NO, repeat NO, connection between the literary Holmes and the one in the movies.
 
jliedeka

jliedeka

Audioholic General
I liked it as well. I'm not really a fan of Guy Ritchie's style but I enjoyed the chemistry between Downey and Law.

Jim
 
Sheep

Sheep

Audioholic Warlord
Both of these movies were a blast in theater, regardless of plot and story issues. I saw the second one in the new VIP theater at my local chain (cineplex). These included reclining leather seats, twist out leather trays and in seat food service including meals and alcoholic drinks. $19.50 a ticket, not including food or alcohol services.

SheepStar
 
adk highlander

adk highlander

Sith Lord
Going tonight after a few beers. I liked the first one so I'm looking forward to seeing it.
 
M

markw

Audioholic Overlord
It's a fun movie. Just sit back, munch popcorn, and be prepared to be entertained.

Nothing to take seriously or in which to find deep spiritual enlightenment. T

Downey and Law play off of each other so well I think they are well positioned to be the new "Lethal Weapon" type of buddy movie franchise. Action, Interplay and wisecracks.
 
adk highlander

adk highlander

Sith Lord
I liked it but I do think the first one was better. What bothered me was it just seemed like Guy Ritchie felt he had to take all his gimmicks (camera slo mo, etc.) to the the next level to keep it fresh but all it did was make it more frenetic and less cohesive of a movie.
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
I liked it but I do think the first one was better. What bothered me was it just seemed like Guy Ritchie felt he had to take all his gimmicks (camera slo mo, etc.) to the the next level to keep it fresh but all it did was make it more frenetic and less cohesive of a movie.
Watched it last night. I agree, the story bounces around a bit, and doesn't hold together as well as the first, but I still had fun watching it.
 
BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
I loved what he did in "lock, stock" and snatch - the reverse event showing - I thought it was cool.
Ala-Matrix slow mo is getting old and tired on me

I did enjoy both movies, but yea - visual effects took a big chunk out of coherency of of script
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
The slo-mo is almost certainly for 3D effects. When watching in 2D, you aren't getting the full benefit of those moments, while in 3D you would not get as much effect if they weren't slowed down like that. So I get why they do it, but it does lose something in translation because it just seems like slo-mo for no reason.
 
3db

3db

Audioholic Slumlord
I have to crack this copy open which is now sitting on my shelf. I enjoyed this movie in the theater an I will enjoy it even more at home.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top