9f9c7z said:
Duffinator is kind of inline with Consumer Reports. CR points out the cost of extended coverage is usually more than the cost of a repair, should a repair ever become necessary. An exception Consumer Reports makes is for plasma and LCD displays. CR recommends buying extended coverage beyond the factory warranty for those items.
That's the key for consideration of any type of insurance. What is the probability of needing a repair and if a repair is needed, how much will it cost relative to what you paid for the insurance.
Few, if any, of those policies cover the 'consumables' such as bulbs that definitely will need to be replaced. Don't listen to the salesman that says they do - you have to read the fine print and every one I've read says clearly that they DO NOT.
So they only cover major malfunctions. With most consumer electronics, if it is defective you will know sooner rather than later and it will be covered by the mfg warranty. If you get unlucky and do have a failure outside of warranty coverage and you did buy the extended coverage, then you have effectively 'prepaid' for your repair. If the malfunction occurs 3 years after you paid for the warranty, then you lost the use of the money you paid for the extended warranty for 3 years (You could have invested that cost for 3 years and been ahead of the game). If it never has a problem over the time that you own it, then the entire extended warranty cost is sunk - just like when you pay for car insurance each and every year and never have to make a claim.
So the bottom line is: Do I pay now to be covered for the low probability event that I may actually need repairs (and lose the whole cost if repairs are never needed) or do I forgo the extended warranty and pay out of my own pocket if repairs are ever needed?
My answer is skip the extended warranty, especially when they cost a huge percentage of the purchase price. They have a very low probability of paying off and from my perspective are truly a sunk cost that can never be recovered.