L

lbro

Enthusiast
Well, I took advantage of the Powerbuy and purchased my Yamaha. Even on backorder the shipment was pretty quick! (thanks guys).

In the installation instructions, it says that some features of Bluray will not work through the receiver, has anyone had any problems? What does not work? Is this something Yamaha will fix in firmware? Finally, are you able to use the internet functions (netflix....) that are available through the Sony Bluray player?

Thanks
Lou
 
M

MNSACD

Enthusiast
Well, I took advantage of the Powerbuy and purchased my Yamaha. Even on backorder the shipment was pretty quick! (thanks guys).

In the installation instructions, it says that some features of Bluray will not work through the receiver, has anyone had any problems? What does not work? Is this something Yamaha will fix in firmware? Finally, are you able to use the internet functions (netflix....) that are available through the Sony Bluray player?

Thanks
Lou
Lou,

I have had the RXV3900 a few months now and have a Sony BDP-S5000ES blu-ray player hooked up to it via HDMI. I also have both units connected to the internet though the ethernet ports. I have the recievers settings set to "through" so it does not do any processing. Picture is simply outstanding and I have not noticed any limitations thus far. I have done two or three connections for BD-Live etc.....everthing works just fine. Audio side is stellar as well.......I bitstream from the Sony and have the Yamaha do the decoding. Hope this helps.

MNSACD
 
L

lbro

Enthusiast
Thanks for the information. That is good news to hear.
Lou
 
Lordoftherings

Lordoftherings

Banned
Yep, I confirm this too. I know several people that own the Yamaha RX-V3900 and are very happy with all around, incuding the very nice HDMI picture with the ABT 2010 video chip, which is one of the very best on the market right now.

The Yamaha RX-Z7 have the same Anchor Bay Technologies ABT2010 chipset video processor with VRS Technology, and it scored a perfect score of 130 on the video test at Audioholics. You cannot ask any better than 100% perfect video score. From the HDMI ouput, you can rest assure that you see the full resolution of all video formats. Heck, you can even watch from the HDMI output with the receiver turn off (Standby). One of the only one receivers to be able to do that.

Don't sweat it, you got one of the very best receiver around. :)

Bob
 
Last edited:
L

lbro

Enthusiast
Thanks Bob,

This is a HUGE step up from what I had. The last system was from a 1992 Yahama set-up. So far so good with the new one, I am just taking my time setting everything up right now.

Lou
 
Lordoftherings

Lordoftherings

Banned
Thanks Bob,

This is a HUGE step up from what I had. The last system was from a 1992 Yahama set-up. So far so good with the new one, I am just taking my time setting everything up right now.

Lou
Hi Lou,

It is a HUGE jump. In 1992, we only have Dolby Pro Logic, that's all!
Now, we are light years ahead from that time, we are talking 18 years here!

I remember when I first bought the very first Dolby Pro Logic receiver on the market in 1988, the Pioneer VSX-9300s (without the center channel amplifier).

And I bought the very first Dolby Digital receiver in 1997, the Yamaha RX-V2092. I live without dTS till I upgrade to a Denon AVR-3805 in 2005. That was a very long time without DTS, how could I do that? Lucy me the the RX-V2092 sounds good in Doby Digital (7.2 system configuration back then in 1997), and that it sounds good on Stereo too with my over 3,000 compact discs then. The Denon AVR-3805 adds DTS, but did not have the control in the low frequencies and the clarity of the Yammy. When you live with a receiver for so many years, you notice the difference pretty quick, and I never adjusted to the sound of the Denon compared to the Yammy. But DTS was a cool sound to have and the 3805 had a better overall set of features that I did appreciate, like the bass management, the Pure Direct mode, the 7.1 multichannel analog input for my DVD Universal player. So the compromise in sound quality was gain back on the newer high resolution audio codecs, which my Yamaha couldn't handle.

Now, with my Onkyo TX-SR876, I'm still behind Dolby Pro Logic IIz, and Audyssey DSX. Fey! It goes so God dam quick!... If not every 6 months, then 4 months!
I had a few more receivers before the 876, which I still have, Marantz, Kenwood, Onkyo 805 and a couple more.
I also have a Yamaha CD-recorder, the CDR-S1000, which is a top notch CD-R, but not anymore after two transplantations of the CD transport.
I look at all the flaws of Yamaha, Denon, Marantz, Pioneer, Harman Kardon, Onkyo, Kenwood and all others over the years, and I try to pick the flaws that I can live with.
I never had the perfect receiver, but I know which ones come the closest.
The Yamaha RX-Z7 is one of them. A little expensive though for my own taste.
To be honest with you, for my own personal choice, I will pick the Onkyo TX-NR906 way before I pick the Yammy RX-Z7. But to save even more money, I did decide on the Onkyo TX-SR876. In the end, money was a big factor in my final decision, and I don't feel any regrets. Maybe I will buy the NR-906 if the price comes down to where I like to see it, and sell my 805. But I also want to wait to see the newer Onkyo TX-NR907 and TX-SR877. With Dolby Pro Logic IIz and Audyssey DSX, I hope.
And I'm still waiting for a good affordable Yamaha receiver where you can utilise the back surround channels in tandem with the two front effect channels, by using an external amplifier. I've been waiting for that one in a long time. Only in their flagship models, that really sucks!
So, now my goal is to follow the smarter manufacturers that don't give up in quality or power and adds very smart and useful features.
Yamaha, I love, but now, I gave up.
Denon, I love too, but now, I gave up too.
Marantz, I love, but I gave up a while back.
Same for Pioneer, I gave up a longer while back.
Onkyo, I hated for a long time, but now, it is their turn to take the central spot on my living room and second system.
Who knows what next year will bring? I always keep an open mind, but I know a good value when there is one.

Bob
 
Last edited:
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Yamaha, I love, but now, I gave up.
Denon, I love too, but now, I gave up too.
Marantz, I love, but I gave up a while back.
Same for Pioneer, I gave up a longer while back.
Onkyo, I hated for a long time, but now, it is their turn to take the central spot on my living room and second system.
Who knows what next year will bring? I always keep an open mind, but I know a good value when there is one.
Bob
Why did you hate Onkyo and give up on Denon and Yamaha? I don't hate Onkyo but my impression of Onkyo in hi fi is like Hyundai in cars. I remember years ago they were the low end Japanese products, below Sansui, Sony, JVC, let alone Yamaha and Denon but now they are considered top notch. I am a little biased against them only because I still remember how they were years ago. When I make my decision on my last receiver upgrade I actually considered the 905 but ended up with another Denon because a) in Canada the 905 was selling at the same price range as the Denon, b) I was able to get a good deal on the Denon, c) I just couldn't find a single good reason to pay for the Reon chip that also comes with more heat, d) I could not resist the wi fi feature, e) the 905 is slightly (in dB terms) more powerful but I use external amp (fronts only) anyway, and f) the Yamaha RX-Z7 was not out yet.

As much as I like the wifi, had I waited longer, I could have ended up with the Yamaha. Anyway, I am just curious to know your rationale on choosing Onkyo you used to hate and gave up on Yamaha and Denon you used to like. Thanks in advance.
 
Lordoftherings

Lordoftherings

Banned
Why did you hate Onkyo and give up on Denon and Yamaha? I don't hate Onkyo but my impression of Onkyo in hi fi is like Hyundai in cars. I remember years ago they were the low end Japanese products, below Sansui, Sony, JVC, let alone Yamaha and Denon but now they are considered top notch. I am a little biased against them only because I still remember how they were years ago. When I make my decision on my last receiver upgrade I actually considered the 905 but ended up with another Denon because a) in Canada the 905 was selling at the same price range as the Denon, b) I was able to get a good deal on the Denon, c) I just couldn't find a single good reason to pay for the Reon chip that also comes with more heat, d) I could not resist the wi fi feature, e) the 905 is slightly (in dB terms) more powerful but I use external amp (fronts only) anyway, and f) the Yamaha RX-Z7 was not out yet.

As much as I like the wifi, had I waited longer, I could have ended up with the Yamaha. Anyway, I am just curious to know your rationale on choosing Onkyo you used to hate and gave up on Yamaha and Denon you used to like. Thanks in advance.
Hey PENG,

Onkyo used to build all their receivers like battle ships, they were the best in the 80s, 90s too. Remember the Onkyo TX-DS989 (THX Ultra 7.1) in 2000?
Do you remember their flagship models from the late 80s to late 90s?
They were the best build, the best looking and the most powerful too.

So I guess that we have different informations then... But one thing for sure, is that I got at home all my magazines dating back from the mid 70s. I actually have a room full of it, it is my audio library room. Mags from all over, USA, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Netherlands, etc.

When Onkyo came back to the scene in 2007 with the 605, 705, 805, 875 and 905, it was a huge come back with the first receivers that could decode the new high resolution audio codecs, including Audyssey room EQ and THX certification, plus HQV Reon video processor. That was the new revolution and it keep going into 2009 with the first receivers to include Dolby Pro Logic IIz, the 607. Look at the 876 and 906 for an example of DYNAMITE included inside a receiver!

Yep, I had to give up with my Denon AVR-3805, and I find the 805 a better fit for my own system than the newer Denon AVR-3808ci, which by the way was costing me $1,400 cdn as compared to the Onkyo 805 only $800 cdn. (The 3808ci retails for $1,850 cdn, and the 805 retails for $1,500 cdn.)
Denon 3808ci at 36 lbs compared to the 805 at 51 lbs. PCM-1796 in the 805 as compared to the 3808ci PCM-1791. Also the 805 is THX Ultra2 certified...
Can you see now my reasonning.
Same for Yamaha, they give you more features, but the build quality suffer.
My old 2092 was 44 lbs, now the similar ones are more money and about 6 pounds lighter. I was looking at the 2700, then the 3800, but still find the 805 a better receiver for less money, plus more power. The dacs are also PCM-1791.

I am from Canada, so my decisions are Canadian ones of course because of price differences.
If you read some of my posts in other threads, you'll get a better idea of where I'm coming from. And if you read me at AVS too.

I first build my own back surround speaker for a show on TV (black & white), Pink Floyd "Live in Pompeii" in 1970, if my memory still intact.

I bought my first audio system back in 1967, and upgrade the next year in 1968. And I never stop since then to always upgrade within my financial resources.
Now, my main room consist of a 13.2-channel configuration!
But of course they are not playing all together for now just yet, but that will come, at least 11.2-channel for sure.

It took me over two years of research and readings to finally make my move, do you realise what I just said, "OVER TWO YEARS" of intense research. That's when I purchased the 805 for $800 cdn on clearance.
The 875 was way too much money, and I did not need the Reon, because I already had it in my Sammy 5000.
And the 905 was just the same as the 875 for way more money.

For the last 20 years or so, my receivers are always listed at close to $2,000.
So they are always the 2nd from the top models.

And now that I only spend $800 for the 805, I decided to buy the 876 to compensate for the balance and use the 805 in my 2nd system.
I got over 10 receivers at home, do you think I need 2nd Zone and 3rd Zone for features?
Because I love so much my hobby, I became attached to all my component purchases and you can say that I am an automatic Receiver's collector and Disc players too and DVD players too and even HD DVD and Blu-Ray players, got 4 already!
I am a true Audioholic, pure and simple. I go to meetings to try attenuating my addiction!

That's the way I am, now that I'm older and wiser, plus extremely patient.

So my rationale is very simple and very calculated with intelligence and experience.

Example: In 1988, the first Dolby Pro Logic receiver was the Pioneer VSX-9300s, which was retailling for $1,200 cdn and that's what I paid, full price then.

In 1997, the first Yamaha Dolby Digital was the RX-V2092, retail was $2,100 cdn. I bought it for a bit less.

In 2004, one of the very best receiver for performance and value was the Denon AVR-3805, $1,920 cdn retail. I bought it the year after for 1/2 that price, without the mic. I bought the mic later.

At the end of the year 2006, I start at looking at new trends. I want in.
Year 2007, Onkyo is doing a huge come back. It is early spring 2007, and I'm researching for a new receiver with all the new audio codecs and want to upgrade my 3805 for sound quality and don't want to give up power for that.
Very balancing act indeed, without spending much more money either.
Waited, readed, researched, waited, more reading, more research, more waiting, price still too high, I am after a year of research, conviced that the Onkyo 805 or 875 is the one destined to be my next. Waited more, more readind, more research, I am more convinced than ever, my convictions begin to be more affirmative, more patience for the price that I set to myself.
More reading, more research, I read all the forums, reviews, all the receivers by all the manufacturers at prices between $799 usa MSRP to $5,500 usa MSRP.
I bought my 805 in the fall of 2008 at clearance price, happy as a cucumber.
End of February this year, I acquire the 876, double dip.

Do you really think that I regret not to buy the Denon AVR-3808ci or even the AVR-4308ci? Same for Marantz SR7002 and the SR8002 or Yamaha RX-V3800, RX-V3900 or even the RX-Z7. And same too for the Pioneer Elite SC-05 and SC-07.
No sir, the Onkyos were the new champs on the block, in particular the 805, 876 and 906 (well you can also include the 875, 905 and even the 705 with THX Select2 and Audyssey MultEQ XT).

I did my home work for such a long time and I've be patient to the extreme, that now I'm ready for the next one, the Onkyo TX-NR907.
I want Dolby Pro Logic IIz, Audyssey MultEQ XT Pro version 1.5 with also Audyssey DSX (Dynamic Surround Expansion). That's an 11.2 system, with two Front Height channels (discrete stereo), and two additional Front Wide Left & Right channels.

And I'm also looking very seriously at TacT TCS HD mkIII with HDMI version 1.4b
And my next TV will be 4k high resolution.

I'm also very interested in Holographic technology, multi-dimensional picture.

Anyway, I hope that it was enlightening for you to comprehend my rationale.

Best regards,

Bob
 
Last edited:
Lordoftherings

Lordoftherings

Banned
I cannot fix my spelling faults.

In my post above, I made a few typing mistakes. I will love to fix it, but I can't. :mad:

Mmmm... Tough to be a Frenchman here at Audioholics...:rolleyes:

Anyway, one word that I type: "conviced", should read "convinced".

Another one that I type: "readind", should read "reading".

So, here you go, two fixes. I'm sure there's more, but I need help for that, because English is not my native language. So, I know that I made few more mistakes here and there, so I really appreciate when someone corrects me. :)

Truly,

Bob
 
bigred7078

bigred7078

Full Audioholic
In my post above, I made a few typing mistakes. I will love to fix it, but I can't. :mad:

Mmmm... Tough to be a Frenchman here at Audioholics...:rolleyes:

Anyway, one word that I type: "conviced", should read "convinced".

Another one that I type: "readind", should read "reading".

So, here you go, two fixes. I'm sure there's more, but I need help for that, because English is not my native language. So, I know that I made few more mistakes here and there, so I really appreciate when someone corrects me. :)

Truly,

Bob
After making a post you only have so long to make an edit before it will not allow it. It prevents people from going back and changing things they had said.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Hello Bob, I, for one, enjoyed your posts so much I never noticed any "mistakes". Thanks again!
 
Lordoftherings

Lordoftherings

Banned
After making a post you only have so long to make an edit before it will not allow it. It prevents people from going back and changing things they had said.
Ya, I did realise that about a month ago or so. I understand the rationale behind this though.
In some way it's OK, you just have to edit your posts (when they need to be) more quickly. I'm good with that as long people don't get piss off at me for making English spelling mistakes, like some did at AVS! :eek:

Thank you,

Bob
 
Lordoftherings

Lordoftherings

Banned
Hello Bob, I, for one, enjoyed your posts so much I never noticed any "mistakes". Thanks again!
Thank you so very much. That really makes me feel good.

In the end, what is important is that people understand what you are saying, even if they disagree. But always with respect. :)

Cheers & Best regards,

Bob
 
G

gorman

Audioholic Intern
Actually, Lord, while further researching the forums for reasons I explained in my thread, I came upon this. And I wished to thank you. It's been a good read and insight inside one audioholic's mind. :)
 
Lordoftherings

Lordoftherings

Banned
Actually, Lord, while further researching the forums for reasons I explained in my thread, I came upon this. And I wished to thank you. It's been a good read and insight inside one audioholic's mind. :)
Thanks Gorman, I really appreciate that.

And by the way, I responded to your last post on the other thread about your next receiver recommendation (remember with Dolby headphone). :)

Regards,

Bob
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top