I'm continuing an off-topic discussion from the following thread:
http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45286
I have my PS3 connected to my Yamaha RX-V659 receiver through optical digital TOSLINK. I run a 2.1 setup. My receiver down-mixes everything to 2.1 for me.
For music, I have the PS3 outputting 44.1 kHz 2-channel PCM to the receiver. That's great. My question is concerning movies.
I can set the PS3 to output 2-channel PCM. The sound is uncompressed, but I get no LFE channel. Otherwise, I can set it to Dolby or DTS multi-channel. The sound is compressed, but I get a LFE channel. Which to you think is the better option?
If one of the multi-channel formats is my better option, then which one? My receiver reads the bitrate for Dolby as 448 Kbps. Divided between 6 channels, that's less than 75 Kbps per channel. Ouch. My receiver reads the bitrate for DTS as 1536 Kbps. Divided between 6 channels, that's 256 Kbps per channel. That's not bad at all. I was surprised that there was such a big difference between the bitrates of the two formats, because DTS isn't regarded as being clearly superior to Dolby from what I've read. One doesn't seem to be commonly regarded as superior to the other, just different.
From listening tests with MP3s, I don't believe I can discern the difference between a 512 Kbps (256 for each channel) MP3 and an uncompressed Red Book CD. On the other hand, a 150 Kbps (75 for each channel) MP3 can sometimes sound a bit rough with artifacts, etc...
Does DTS and Dolby compression compare to MP3 compression, or is it less efficient? If it's about the same, then DTS would certainly be my best option because it would give me multi-channel output (the LFE channel is all I'm concerned with really) and sound quality that is indiscernible from uncompressed CD audio to my ears. Am I making incorrect assumptions here? What do you recommend?