Panasonic DVD-S97 DVD Player Review

<A href="http://www.audioholics.com/productreviews/avhardware/PanasonicDVDS97p1.php"><IMG style="WIDTH: 125px; HEIGHT: 25px" alt=[panasonicDVDS97] hspace=10 src="http://www.audioholics.com/news/thumbs/panasonicDVDS97_th.jpg" align=left border=0></A>Panasonic has always made highly regarded DVD-Video players, and the DVD-RP82 was widely regarded by many as one of the best DVD players ever made (so much so that when it was discontinued, these players were selling on E-Bay for higher than the original Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price!) However, it seems that after the DVD-RP82, Panasonic went down-market and released a set of lackluster models. Well, this is no longer the case, as the DVD-S97 is a worthy successor to the DVD-RP82. Like the DVD-RP82, it is a progressive scan DVD-Audio/Video player with Faroudja DCDi deinterlacing. However, it improves upon the DVD-RP82 through the addition of quite a few significant features...

[Read the Review]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Buckeyefan 1

Buckeyefan 1

Audioholic Ninja
Christine,

Thanks for an informative review.

How does this player hold up to Pioneer's new 79 series Elite player, or Denon's 29 and 39 series?

In your opinion, would this ~$300 purchase be warranted over waiting for a backwards compatible HD/Blu Ray player assuming they can be had for ~$500 if released in several months?
 
A

AFJumper03

Junior Audioholic
I own this player and I have been very happy with it from Day one. The HDMI upconverting is really impressive, and I am discovering new things I love on every DVD I watch. I highly recommend it to people looking for a reasonably priced DVD player.
 
D

df4801

Banned
Does anybody know what is the main difference between the S97 and the S77? (other than the $50-100 price diff) The specs look the same.
 
Takeereasy

Takeereasy

Audioholic General
Really nice review. Glad to see that the Panny gets recognized as a good value.
 
W

wsiler

Enthusiast
I own this player and I love it. Great for the price and does well with my Samsung 6168 DLP at 1080p. Star Wars III opening sequence and "100 mile dash" from The Incredibles are unbelievable.

As to the review. From Ms. Tham's review...

"Since I did not have an HDMI-capable display, I only tested the player in 480p/576p via component video output."

That is like reviewing a 7.1 surround sound receiver and only using a stereo speaker setup on the test. If you are going to review something, it should be reviewed for it's major features. The majority of DVD players can be had with component video output. Not a new feature and not something to howl about. How many have HDMI and how many upconvert to 720p or 1080i?

Looking at her web page it looks like she has a Sony projector for her display.

I say time for an do-over. Go connect that thing to an HDMI capable display that can do 1080p and then review. Now you are talking NICE!!

Cheers,
Wiley
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
I say time for an do-over. Go connect that thing to an HDMI capable display that can do 1080p and then review. Now you are talking NICE!!
First off we are working on upgrading Chris's display system so she can test at higher resolutions. FYI, the Panny player wont do 1080p and there isn't much source material for that right now even if it did. Don't get too hung up on 1080p, at least right now anyways.
 
A

apd

Audiophyte
Can anyobdy compare the S97 to the Yamaha C750? They are both in the same price range.

apd.
 
W

wsiler

Enthusiast
gene said:
First off we are working on upgrading Chris's display system so she can test at higher resolutions. FYI, the Panny player wont do 1080p and there isn't much source material for that right now even if it did. Don't get too hung up on 1080p, at least right now anyways.

Nor did I suggest it does output 1080p. It outputs 1080i. The DISPLAY I referenced (mine) is capable of 1080p... at least the Sammy 6168 is along with a few others out there.

Regarding source material, is there anything other than WMV HD that is in 1080p and available now? Nothing that I know of until the next gen of DVD players emerges....

Regardless, my point is that test driving the Panny on that monitor at that resolution is like test driving a Corvette in rush hour traffic at 20 MPH. You may be driving the car but you are not testing it for it's strengths. Sure, it looks pretty and the engine revs nicely and you like the sound of the exhaust, but are you really driving it like it should be driven for a review? I think not. That is my point. Take the criticism how you will. I think my point is valid.

As far as being "hung up" on 1080p, regardless of the source, the final output on the Samsung 6168 is.... 1080p !!! The S97 upconverts to 1080i and the Samsung converts to 1080p. For now, this is as close as we can get to true 1080p from DVD until the next gen hits. What is the point of DVD if not to achieve the highest resolution and picture quality possible?

The review was not done using HDMI and it was not done on a monitor that supported the resolution capabilities of the player. I look forward to the "do-over" when you upgrade her monitor though, like I said of the S97S, I own it, I love it, and I would recommend it.

Cheers,
Wiley
 
W

WoofBoyZaq

Audiophyte
Happy to see another review on the site.

I have an S97S that's currently deployed as my DVD player and CD transport. It's connected to a Rotel 1056.

I tried the players DAC for audio, both enchanced and unenhanced as well as a digital transport (enhanced & bit-perfect) to the Rotel.

I found that the sound I prefered was using the player as a bit-perfect (no enhancement) transport, and rely on the Rotel for the decoding. (The rotel can handle HDCD)

At first I thought it could be caused by the Rotel not handling 88.2 khz as well and so connected the analog inputs from the CD player.

In short, regardless of what was doing the decoding, I believe the AV enhancer detracted from the sound of CD or HDCD audio. I also prefer the sound of the 1056 as a decoder compared to the player.


My one question:

I'm assuming Christine isn't in the United States.

Would the 50 hz 'spike' be a 60hz fundamental in countries that distribute power as a 60hz waveform?
 
runninkyle17

runninkyle17

Audioholic
wsiler said:
What is the point of DVD if not to achieve the highest resolution and picture quality possible?
Ummm...let me think! Portability, storage, convenience, realiability, and quality. So those are just a few things that DVD's were designed for in the first place. If you really want to argue that DVD's were made only to increase picture quality then I would not talk to any computer users at all. DVD's were first and foremost designed as a replacement for CD storage in the computer market. I know, I know, but DVD stands for Digital Video Disk. This did not come about until DVD's were being used as a major source for video content. Their original purpose was as a replacement storage media for CD's, not for video.

wsiler said:
The review was not done using HDMI and it was not done on a monitor that supported the resolution capabilities of the player.
Well if you have an HDMI capable player, why don't you stop griping about the review and do your own review and help us out on the HD capabilites of the S97!

If this post sounds a little forward and rude I apologize, but I do not appreciate it when people complain about a decent review. If there is such a big problem with a review and you have the means to do the review yourself then stop complaining and spend your time and effort with a review!!!
 
W

wsiler

Enthusiast
runninkyle17 said:
Ummm...let me think! Portability, storage, convenience, realiability, and quality. So those are just a few things that DVD's were designed for in the first place. If you really want to argue that DVD's were made only to increase picture quality then I would not talk to any computer users at all. DVD's were first and foremost designed as a replacement for CD storage in the computer market. I know, I know, but DVD stands for Digital Video Disk. This did not come about until DVD's were being used as a major source for video content. Their original purpose was as a replacement storage media for CD's, not for video.
Wow. Perhaps I needed to say "DVD as a medium for movie watching" in order for you to get it. Since the DVDs in question are for movies not data AND this site is about hi-end audio/video not PCs AND the thread we are in is specific to a DVD player... I figured I did not need to spell it out to that degree.

Were DVDs made for all of things you say? Sure. Is that relevent here? Not a bit. My point was that VIDEO DVDs, as a medium for movies, and DVD players as a consumer product serve exactly the purpose I proposed. To bring higher resolution video to the end user. Of course increased resolution means increased storage capacity requirements.

runninkyle17 said:
Well if you have an HDMI capable player, why don't you stop griping about the review and do your own review and help us out on the HD capabilites of the S97!
You should re-read my first post to this thread. It was not griping. It was pointing out that the review was an under utililization of the player's capabilities... A comment which I still stand by. As to reviewing, I would be more than happy to give a laymans review as that is all I feel I am qualified to do. I don't work with AV every day or spend thousands of dollars per year on toys. I buy every 3-5 years based upon components that I think will have a good extended use capability. Like many others, I tend to rely on people with more experience for the reviews. Much like we are relying on Ms. Tham's review to cover the features of this player. My point was and still is... Without hooking the player up to an HDMI capable display and looking at it at the highest output resolution of the player, you just cannot truly know what it is capable of. What is griping about that? It is an observation and an obvious one at that. An important test for this review was not done. A feature of the player was not utilized. That hardly seems mean of me to say. Especially given the fact that I pointed it out then said I look forward to seeing the "do-over" when those features are tested. Would "update" be a better word here?

runninkyle17 said:
If this post sounds a little forward and rude I apologize, but I do not appreciate it when people complain about a decent review. If there is such a big problem with a review and you have the means to do the review yourself then stop complaining and spend your time and effort with a review!!!
And I am sure everyone appreciates someone(you) complaining about someone's(me) assessment of a review. There is some irony for you. :)
It is a forum. People express ideas and review the reviews.

I have a right to my opinion and I think my statement was accurate. I even spelled it out. The review is fine, adequite, decent. Not none of those words are synonymous with stellar, exceptional, or excellent. The review was adequite. You even said yourself. It is a decent review.

However, it would be a better review if the features of the player were fully utilized. However, in it's use a comparison between the old Panasonic model adn the S97S it has value. I would just have like to have seen the HDMI and 1080i output tested. That has been the only point to my statement.
 
C

Christine Tham

Audiophyte
Thanks for all the feedback

First of all, thanks for all the positive responses to my review, as well as the constructive comments.

I do apologise for not being able to test the player on the HDMI output, as I do not have an HDMI capable display or a processor able to decode high resolution audio on the HDMI output. That is a very attractive feature on this player, and no doubt many would be using this player primarily via the HDMI output.

However, I do like to set a few misconceptions straight. First of all, the HDMI output is not necessarily better than the analog outputs, and the video upscaling feature (available only on the HDMI output) is not necessarily a good thing. It really depends on your display.

First of all, the FLI-2310 deinterlacer and scaler exhibits the macro-blocking bug on the HDMI output, but it does not appear to be present on the component video output.

Secondly, even if the macro-blocking bug is not there, upscaling to 720p or 1080i is not always a good idea. The resolution of DVD is fixed to 480i (NTSC) or 576i (PAL). Deinterlacing converts this to a potential 480p or 576p, but it stops here. Upscaling to 720p or 1080i does not provide extra resolution, and may introduce scaling artefacts (eg. the macro-blocking bug).

In fact, if your display has a native resolution of anything other than EXACTLY 720p or 1080p, upscaling by the player is a bad idea, because it results in double scaling (the player scales to either 720p or 1080i, and the display rescales to native resolution). Double scaling may exarcebate scaling artefacts, and end up worse than multiple analog to digital conversions.

In summary then, I would not recommend the HDMI output on this player UNLESS you have a display that is NOT sensitive to the macro-blocking bug AND have a native resolution of EXACTLY 720p or 1080p. Otherwise, you should configure the player for 480p/576p on either HDMI (if your display supports this) or component video out (for all other cases).

Hope this helps.
 
W

wsiler

Enthusiast
OK. As a follow up to this little debate and review I completed the "layman's" tests as I defined in my earlier response. Layman. It won't be real technical but I think it tells what someone with this DVD player can expect with a display like mine. Here are the details...

Monitor:
Samsung 6168 DLP 1080p
Those not familiar this is a native 1080p display that uses wobbulation to achieve a full 1080 lines of progressive scan. Arguments on wobulation can be found elsewhere if that debate interests you. For me, I can say this about the display as seen with the S97 and DirecTV HD (specifically DiscoveryHD). I never see RBE nor has anyone who has seen my display. The picture seems crisp without being harsh and I would call this display top notch without any reservation. All content is upconverted to 1080p on this set so keep that in mind when thinking of the source. Anyway, on to the DVD player.

DVD Player:
S97 of course...

I tested using a standard 3' HDMI cable and a standard set of 3' component cables. I used National Treasure to test as the opening credits and sequence are very dark. At the beginning of the test, I was configured with the DVD player outputting 1080i over the HDMI connector. 60ms of sound delay was applied to deal with synch. TV mode and DVD AV Enhance mode were unknown. Immediately I noticed that black cubes can be seen around the Disney logo at film start. This is macro-blocking I assume? By changing the AV Enhance settings and adjusting the TV settings, these artifacts disappeared altogether. Black levels were good and I no longer see any obvious artifacting.

Regarding HDMI and the issue of 1080i output. I switched to the component cables and checked for the macroblocking issue. While not present, the clarity of the picture suffered noticeably. The best picture was achieved with the DVD player set to output 1080i over HDMI. The picture via Component did not nearly come close to the level of clarify on the HDMI. At lower resolutions, the double conversion caused there to be some pixel noise.

To address the comments...

First of all, the FLI-2310 deinterlacer and scaler exhibits the macro-blocking bug on the HDMI output, but it does not appear to be present on the component video output.
I assume you must have read that somewhere since you did not connect the DVD player via HDMI? I have read that too. However, by tweaking the display and the DVD player, the issue is all but removed.


However, I do like to set a few misconceptions straight. First of all, the HDMI output is not necessarily better than the analog outputs, and the video upscaling feature (available only on the HDMI output) is not necessarily a good thing. It really depends on your display.
Yes, the display is the issue. As the display was the issue I raised with the review. While your theoretical statements are true (yes, upscaling is not always good), in the case of this DVD player and specifically the display I am using, upscaling at the DVD player yields the best picture. A test with a display capable or 720p or 1080p resolution might have yielded the same results for you.

In fact, if your display has a native resolution of anything other than EXACTLY 720p or 1080p, upscaling by the player is a bad idea, because it results in double scaling (the player scales to either 720p or 1080i, and the display rescales to native resolution). Double scaling may exarcebate scaling artefacts, and end up worse than multiple analog to digital conversions.
Is anyone out there buying displays that are anything other than native 720p or 1080p? If they are, they are novices buying cheap non-HD plasmas at Sam's Club and I doubt they even know how to change the settings in a DVD player. Again, buying an upscaling DVD player for your 852(H) x 480(V) ED Plasma would be a complete waste. A $90 progressive scan player is just as likely to look good on that display.

In summary then, I would not recommend the HDMI output on this player UNLESS you have a display that is NOT sensitive to the macro-blocking bug AND have a native resolution of EXACTLY 720p or 1080p. Otherwise, you should configure the player for 480p/576p on either HDMI (if your display supports this) or component video out (for all other cases).
I will go you one further. I recommend not buying this or any other $300 upscaling player if your display is not a minimum of 720p native resolution. If you plan on outputting at 480p/ or 576p, you are just wasting dollars for zero gain in clarity or resolution. However, it you have a 1080p native display, I give two thumbs up on this player. Minor tweaking in the player removes most artifacting. Further tweaking of the display helps as well. My only complaint is the lack of an eject button on the remote.

In conclusion, the important factor here is the use of a natively high resolution display. My original point made over again. For this price point, the inclusion of a scaler in the player makes upscaling to 720p/1080i the whole reason to even purchase this player. Testing at less than those resolutions is nearly pointless and does not address the features of the player which make it worth $300. Sorry to beat a dead horse, but a review of this player with a display that is not 720p or 1080p capable is a complete waste. There are $100 players out there that can compete nicely in the 480p/576p range.

Please just concede that there needs to be a update to the review that tests this unit doing what people pay $300 for. Upscaling.

Cheers,
Wiley
 
W

westcott

Audioholic General
Their are more important reasons to go HDMI other than just the generally better picture quality. It is called HDCP compliance and the obsolecence of component output for digital content.

Other advantages of HDMI are 12 bit RGB signals to address contouring artifacts and deliver below-black information that gets truncated using component connections.
 
Preetu

Preetu

Audiophyte
Hi all

I was planning to buy a DVD player and therefore planned to do some research work before purchasing it!!!......thats when I came accross this forum and got some really good reviews here …..while searching I also came across I site inods.com it’s giving pretty good reviews…..just check it out and plz keep me updated with good reviews

:)
 
M

mlai01

Audiophyte
Audio output problem

I recently purchased S97 and just love its awesome picture quality and numerous calibration features. The only thing that puzzles me is that I can not get audio from my speakers when I play CD on the player. I hooked up the audio output of S97 to my Harmon Kardon receiver via coxial cable and video out to my HD TV through HDMI connection. I have no problem getting sound through the receiver when I play DVD movies. However, when I switched the source input of my TV to another input or turned off the TV, there is no sound. Turning on the Audio Only function did not help.

I wonder if anyone of you folks can give me some advice to fix this problem.

Thanks
 
P

Pabby

Audiophyte
I have the S97 connected to the Panasonic PTAE-900 LCD Projector via the HDMI cable. I have carefully compared the picture quality while watching several movies (Star Wars Revenge of the Sith being one of them) and in my particular setup I always find that the picture always looks sharper (but a bit more grainy), more detailed, and more colorful when the S97 is set to 480P. At 720P the picture is smoother, a little less detailed, and a bit softer (washed out) compared to 480P. At 1020i the picture becomes even more softer and less detailed. This may be because of the projector itself, and not the S97. When I first got the S97 I thought that the picture looked better at 720P, but changed my mind after comparing it carefully. I tried all the different filter settings on the S97 and still came up with the same opinion. Without careful comparison 720P does look pretty good though.

Just my opinion
 
W

westcott

Audioholic General
Pabby said:
I have the S97 connected to the Panasonic PTAE-900 LCD Projector via the HDMI cable. I have carefully compared the picture quality while watching several movies (Star Wars Revenge of the Sith being one of them) and in my particular setup I always find that the picture always looks sharper (but a bit more grainy), more detailed, and more colorful when the S97 is set to 480P. At 720P the picture is smoother, a little less detailed, and a bit softer (washed out) compared to 480P. At 1020i the picture becomes even more softer and less detailed. This may be because of the projector itself, and not the S97. When I first got the S97 I thought that the picture looked better at 720P, but changed my mind after comparing it carefully. I tried all the different filter settings on the S97 and still came up with the same opinion. Without careful comparison 720P does look pretty good though.

Just my opinion
The video processors in the Panasonics are, as you have pointed out, pretty much equals in both units. Letting the projector do the final upscale to its native format to 720p should be pretty close in picture quality.

Congratulations. Sounds like you have made some very good equipment selections and should be rewarded with years of quality viewing.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top