hidog1 said:
I thought the cheesy aspects and overacting were typical of Japanese films.
Not necessarily. Their acting style is definitely more melodramatic than I would like (gross generalization) but this movie was way over the top. Flopping around looking for a newspaper in front of a new reporter, interrupting her in the middle of a broadcast, how the stabber dude was so over-the-top crazy, all this and more was just way too much for me. Some of this you could justify by the situation (ok, his daughter just died so he's acting a little nuts) but taken as a whole, I just didn’t buy it.
hidog1 said:
The newspaper metaphor was interesting to me
I know that I was ridiculing the “Newspaper of Terror” in my previous post but honestly, I think that is because the movie (and the characters) didn’t sell the idea. If they had really sold me on the terror the newspaper instilled, I may have reacted differently. Lets put it this way, after Psycho, people didn’t want to take showers, after Jaws, people didn’t want to swim (many, not even in pools), I’m not thinking anyone is going to have a problem opening their morning paper after this movie.
hidog1 said:
I like the fact that they did not go over the top with the CG. Made it seem more real.
This seems indicative of the Japanese Horror genre in general. In the Grudge, the hand that seemed to come out of the back of SMG’s head was not CG, they just did a lot of takes until it looked just right.
I love CG as much as the next guy but I really think if you can do it "for real" than you should. Face it, Yoda was a puppet, everyone knew he was a puppet, he looked like, moved like, and acted like a puppet. But he was far more real to me in the first trilogy than in the second. Heck, I even liked him better in the cartoon.
JohnA said:
I think the last 20 mins or so with all the "disjointed scenes" was the better part of the movie.
No doubt.
Out of 10, I'd give it a 3 overall and a 7 for the last 20 minutes.