NAD T163 Preamp / Processor / Tuner

H

hopjohn

Full Audioholic
The NAD T163 Preamp processor is one of a very few seperates available that can do what it does for a street price of around $1300 or less. There are receivers out there that have as many or more bells and whistles, but each are succeptable to any negative effects that might be caused by an amplifier being housed under the same hood. If receivers are your preference, then buying the NAD probably doesn't make much sense, but if seperates are your game then the NAD T163 should be on a short list to consider.

The NAD is a hefty unit for a prepro, for all its guts it is a robust 18 lbs. The cosmetics are what you might expect from any NAD product, no glitz or glam, just a simple gray face that is reserved and to the point. The display reads well with its large, blue characters which can be read easily from typical listening postions. The volume knob turns fluidly in 1db increments.

The T163 shines most with its stereo performance, which seemed to be the largest single improvement over the receiver that I had been using in the very same setup previously. The sound is very neutral, lacking any hint of the brightness that the Sony DA4ES exhibited. Typically you know when a unit can do stereo well, it's going to to perform well with movies also, this unit is no exception as movies sound great. The typical array of dts and dolby decoding is complemented by NAD's proprietary EARS decoding which sounds more natural than most DSPs typically used, and is great for casual TV viewing. A 7 channel stereo mode is also included.

Another most impressive thing about the T163 is the ease in which it can be used. The thought process that went into making the menus and functionalitly of this unit shows, and the people responsible for designing it deserve kudos. It is truly "user-friendly superior" to anything else I've ever layed my hands on, which so far includes SONY, ONKYO, HARMON KARDON, YAMAHA, ONKYO and JVC receivers. No more digging deep into some hard to find feature menu to try and find a particular setting as each of the NAD's menus are well identified and very intuitive. I mastered every aspect in the control of this unit is less than a days time, so you can expect a high WAP in this area.

The T163 has 5 fully customizable settings that are stored in non-volatile memory. So say you have a DVD Combi player where you use both the optical and 7.1 analog outputs, one for DVD playback, and one for SACD playback respectiively. You could use the customizable settings to quickly switch between your saved settings and allow for proper level adjustments, and input assigment with a touch of a button. This is just one of many examples for this extremely flexible feature.

The customizable naming of the input devices is possible, so you can name the VCR input a Tivo, or what have you, if you prefer.

Often overlooked by manufacturer's is the tuner section. It is nice to see that NAD didn't skimp on quality here. The unit can interpret off air RDS data and scroll the station name, song playing etc. on the display. Also the tuner plays very cleanly and has truly solid reception capabilites. Station presets can be custom named like that of the input devices

The T163 includes a learning, back lit remote. Some of the buttons are a little on the small side, but overall it has a nice clean look and feel. I prefer my MX-500 to this remote, but I could say that about just about any remote out there. Also included is a credit card sized 2nd remote which operates all the 2nd room/zone functionality independent of the main room.

Another nice feature is the ability to make on the fly adjustments for the Center, Surrounds, and Subwoofer levels. So if the bass in U-571 is a little much for your wife she can just tap it down under control, and then later you can go back to your preset or just tap it right back up again.


Pros
Stereo Sound is clean, natural, and unaltered
Movies are great too
Ease of use is astonishing
On the fly Level Adjustments
Nice Readable Display
Excellent tuner section
Few prepros cost this little
RS-232 Upgradable

Cons
No DTS 96/24 or Pro Logic IIX
Low Pass Xover is global
No Bass Management for 7.1 in
Front Video input cover is flimsy

Features and Specifications:
Dolby Digital EX, Dolby Digital, ProLogic II, DTS, DTS ES,
DTS NEO:6, Matrix 7.1, EARS, Stereo Enhanced Surround Modes,
HDCD Decoding, Stereo Bypass
192kHz/24 bit DACs for all channels
6 Video Inputs all S-Video and Composite, 2 tape loops
HDTV Compatible Component Video on 3 Inputs and 1 Output
3 Audio Inputs, 1 Tape Loop
6 Digital Inputs, 4 Coaxial, 2 TOS Link freely assignable
2 Digital Outputs, 1 Coaxial, 1 TOS Link
7.1 Analog Input
Analog input levels are adjustable for best S/N ratio
Pre-amp Outputs employ discrete component buffer amps
for ultra-low output impedance and high current drive
Zone 2 A/V PreOut with independent source and volume
RS-232 port interface
3 x 12V Trigger Outputs, 12V Trigger Input
IR Input, 3 x IR Output
All Inputs can be renamed, and preferred surround mode is saved to input location
5 Custom Scenario Presets store unique speaker setting (Bass Management) surround mode and tone control settings for instant recall
FM/AM tuner with 30 station preset memory and RDS display
HTR-2 - 8 Device Illuminated Learning Remote with Macro function
ZR-2 Remote with unique Zone 2 commands
Analog Performance:
Dynamic range 95dB
Analog channel separation 70dB
Crosstalk 70dB
Maximum output level 5V rms
Output impedance
Tape out 330 ohms
Multi room output 330
Tone control:
Bass (@20Hz) ± 10dB; Treble (@20kHz) ± 10dB
Video:
Input and output impedance 70 ohms
Dimensions (W x H x D) 17 1/8" x 6 5/8" x 16 1/2"
 
Last edited:
Rip Van Woofer

Rip Van Woofer

Audioholic General
Veerrry tempting! Thanks for the review! Do any of our resident techies have anything to add re: NAD's choice of chips and circuit topology? (Long shot, I know. Not everyone disassembles gear for a pleasant evening's diversion! :rolleyes: )

Now, if someone will do the S170i...Nad sez it's for "sonic excellence above all else" which appeals to me, especially if it's reasonably priced. Been eying it but the local dealer is a bit of a hike from me. I'm sure it's more than the 163, naturally.
 
Last edited:
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
HopJohn;

Thanks for the very informative assessment. We will contact NAD shortly to begin reviewing their gear.
 
Rip Van Woofer

Rip Van Woofer

Audioholic General
gene said:
HopJohn;

Thanks for the very informative assessment. We will contact NAD shortly to begin reviewing their gear.
Review the S170i!
Review the S170i!
Review the S170i!

I think it's time for my anti-obsessive meds...
 
NAD T163 PreAmplifier Review Declined by NAD

From NAD regarding a T163 PreAmplifier Review:

Clint,

Your recent request for NAD product was forwarded to me and I have discussed it at length with Mark Stone. NAD has decided to respectfully decline at this time. They did send the T163/ T973 out for a couple reviews and have chosen not to send out any more review samples of these two models. This is common for NAD, they generally only get a couple reviews of certain models that they wish to promote. Thanks for your request and your continued interest in NAD products. We will keep Audioholics in mind for future reviews.


Alas, we're not quite sure why NAD is one of the only companies who doesn't want us to review their equipment (maybe it's just these models, but they didn't suggest any alternatives either), but this seems to be the case at the moment. Since the review costs them nothing (except shipping) we're completely at a loss as to why they are missing out on this opportunity.

If you would like to see NAD products reviewed here, I suppose you could drop them an email to let them know your opinion on the matter.
 
H

hopjohn

Full Audioholic
NAD review in The Perfect Vision

The Perfect Vision reviewed the NAD T163 / T973 combination in their May/June 2004 issue. The review was fairly short to begin with and then spent a good deal of time discussing the seperates vs. receivers issue. Since it was a review of two products (also the T973 7 channel amp), and wasted time getting to the point, it was less informative than it could have been, though it was positive overall nonetheless.

Reviewer Neil Grader has more of a problem with the "uninspired" remote than I do, but agreed that the T163 is very musical, and has common sense functionality. Comparing the remote with most receiver remotes I've used, I feel it is above average.

Also according to Greg Steider's Manufacturer's Comments in the same issue, NAD is planning to begin shipping units with PLIIX this summer (now) and provide software upgrades for those with 7.1 setups at the same time. No specifics about the software upgrades are given, but according to the manual it is done through the RS 232 / serial port, a Microsoft based system, and with software provided by your local NAD dealer.
 
Last edited:
Yamahaluver

Yamahaluver

Audioholic General
Only one word for this dastardly cowardly act.............chicken.................cluck, cluck,cluck..........seems like they are afraid the truth will come out.
 
H

hopjohn

Full Audioholic
Yamahalover, maybe you'd like to spend some time writing a review on one of your beloved Yamaha products, that way when you're done I can dismiss everything you said in your review in a sentence or two of nonsense. I guess when my favorite review forum or magazine has declined a review sample of any Yamaha product I'll have free reign to slight them in anyway possible, since they are cluck, cluck, chicken. No, you know what, better yet, I'll just keep my mouth shut, use my brain, and realize they probably had a reason for respectfully declining the request, irregradless of whether I understand or agree with their reasons. I think instead I'll actually listen to or audition a product before I begin bad mouthing it. Then again, I'm not you, so I'm feeling better about the situation already.
 
Rip Van Woofer

Rip Van Woofer

Audioholic General
Hopjohn (and other NAD home theatre gear owners): if you can elaborate more on the subjective quality of the EARS surround DSP, especially on orchestral music that'd be great. Sometimes these proprietary DSPs are quite good, I've heard. Sometimes they're "music in a toilet" as I think Gene wrote once. HK had one on their old Citation prepros (can't remember what it was called) that was superb with stereo recordings according to some I've talked to.

BTW, after some poking around I found that the S170i has a MSRP of $3500US. Saw a dealer demo on Audiogon for $1750. Worth the extra bucks? Hmmm...

About bass management (since that comes up a lot in prepro reviews): would it be fair to say that unless you spend the big bucks for a high-end unit, you should probably get something like the Outlaw ICBM too if that's an issue? Mind you, I'm a guy who until recently thought that "bass management" was something a fisheries biologist did.

Happy Fourth all!
 
Last edited:
H

hopjohn

Full Audioholic
Bass Management

I don't own the Outlaw ICBM, so my comments are based on material I've read. The Outlaw ICBM is likely to be a great option with the T163 or any prepro or receiver that might even have some bass managament options for the 7.1 input. The reason being is that it is extremely flexible, and designed with high grade audio components for audiophile performance. Other reveiwers have praised its performance and commented on its effectiveness of not coloring the signal as it passes through, the very thing I would be most concerned about. It can also manage a 6th rear channel should that ever become a necessity. So I guess you could say it is a little future ready (Chesky discs claim to have a 6th channel, read more on them if you like, but I have no experience with their products)

As far as the EARS processing is concerned, I will do some critical listening with orchestral works and then get back to you on that.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top