God I hate Runco.
It sounds like a press release when I read "This differentiates Runco's passive approach from other high-end 3D projection systems, which are based on "active" LCD shutter-glass technology."
At $200,000 you are in the passive 3D technology range. Digital Projection does it, Christie does it, a ton of companies do it. Heck, I've seen Pico projectors from BenQ (or was it LG?) setup in a 'dual projector' setup.
The entire purpose of active shutter glasses technology is that it allows for a standard screen to be used and allows for incorporation into LCD/plasma displays rather easily with full resolution 1080p being maintained.
So, yeah, what differentiates my sub $5,000 3D projection setup from Runco's projection setup is not the passive vs. active glasses.
It's the Porsche Turbo convertible that I can now afford because I didn't just drop $200,000 on a projector!
I wish that Runco would just focus more on their actual tech specs which make their product a solid piece of gear.
I think the highlight of this projector is that it allows for passive 3D while NOT requiring a silver screen which provides a poor 2D viewing surface.
How bright is it? (not mentioned)
What is the resolution? (not mentioned)
At $200,000 I am looking for 7,000+ lumens and included 2.35 support out of the box.
Heck, why would I care about custom paint colors when a proper design will have the projector buried in a hush box or in a projection booth?
If I could afford this projector easily, the one thing I know for sure is that I would never buy it. Digital Projection, Christie, Projection Design - those 3 companies would be near the top of my 'high end list'. Definitely not Runco.