Over the decades I have gathered that this business of cable differences sometimes loses touch with reality. We use (subjective) hearing tests and adjectives, often neglecting using figures to get things in context. Even then ....
In his post #7 Mr Della Salla finds a difference of fourfold between two wire gauges - serious! (not that he said so). It was found that in the specific case the cable loss was 0,07db for one and 0,28dB for the other. Both are inaudible. Even if much higher - can one not simply adjust the volume a smidgen higher??
The only other issue is the effect on loudspeaker damping. Not to digress, but ever since the classic but ill-conceived definition of damping factor as loudspeaker impedance/source resistance came into being, the misconception started. That "damping factor" has little if any bearing on loudspeaker performance.
(For the uninitiated: The damping of a loudspeaker is a function of the total series resistance in the driver circuit. That consists of amplifier output impedance, cable resistance and voice coil resistance. In practice the d.c. resistance of an 8 ohm loudspeaker is seldom lower than 5,5 ohm. Thus even if amplifier plus cable impedance is zero, the best real damping factor that can exist will be say 1,5. (It is borne out by tests and listening,) Thus someone has to explain to me how a loudspeaker cable resistance of even several hundred milli-ohms can make an audible difference.)
My respects to those hearing otherwise; there are an equal number of people not hearing the same, and they are not all simply deaf. I have read many technical articles endeavouring to prove the case for "special" cables scientifically; not one of them could succeed in that for audio. (Nobody is trying to make a case for bell wire; it is about the many tens/hundreds of $ for a cable.)