This is the TV i have atm thats being replaced
LE46C750 3D LCD-TV 46" - OVERZICHT | SAMSUNG
SL380030.AVI - YouTube
The issue why its being replaced.
They tryit everything to fix this.
I even went to buy high quality hdmi cable coax cable tv signal reducers etc.
Nothing fixed it.
They tryit switching the board and the psu nothing helped.
This is the cheapest TV i could pick as replacement option within range.
aka being 46 inch being 400 hz cmr and having all the same features that samsung tv has and ofc being an lcd.
UE46D6750 LED-TV 46" - OVERZICHT | SAMSUNG
Should i accept this replacement even tough i might have to pay 99E extra.
My fears are that i'm getting something back thats worse in terms off quality then i already had.
Or is this considered an big upgrade compared to my old TV ?
Because it kindy pisses me off i got to go to store to get glasses replaced by pair that works on my new TV . Having to pay little bit extra asswell for getting glasses replaced asswell.
I life in holland acording to law they should actualy replace the TV without any BS considering the fact within the same as old TV and ofc while being cheapest option compared to what previously payed for.
My tv i payed 900E for and 200E on expansive hdmi cables coax camples signal reducers ferite cores etc.
The replacement TV cost 1099E being cheapest option.
They are thinking tough to take the 100E out off their own wallet but are still considering to ask me 100E from me.
Should i just accept this as replacement or should i give them the finger ?
If got this broken TV for like a year its been pissing me off so much.
If even considered going mad and just picking up a brick and smash the TV in 1000 bits.
If the TV was't broken to begin with i be 200E richer.
If the TV could be fixed i be paying nothing asswell.
I want to buy a
http://www.svsound.com/subwoofers/ported-box/pb12-nsd this month asswell.
I'm most likely having to delay this by 1 month due store being bit childish they where sugesting for me to pick smaller TV even...