As I recollect, all of my "quality recordings" are simple, such as vocalist and guitar. The more miking, and instruments the less likely I will be satisfied. Perhaps if I had speaker arrays with multiple crossovers I might recognize a greater number of recordings in my music library as being high quality. At any rate, I've really enjoyed the views shared here about what's really important.
What is surprising is that our unique perspectives cause us all, it appears, to see it differently. When I was just getting into hi-fi, back in the early 70's, I started out with what i perceived was the best system I could afford. This system consisted of a Marantz 2230 receiver, a BSR record changer, and a pair of 3 way Marantz speakers. The speakers were no substitute for the popular JBL L100's of the day. The record changer did not track recordings very well, and the receiver needed warranty work in the first week of its usage. What a way to get into it all. Now, after going through about $85,000 over the years upgrading I am no longer chasing for a sound which is just over the horizon. I am satisfied. I also realize now that if I had made better decisions initially I could have had a system which would likely saved me a whole lot of money, frustration, and still be functioning today.
For any here just getting into it, reading well crafted advertisements put together by masters of marketing can make purchases of audio equipment a very emotional experience. This turns things upside down where the newly indoctrinated audiophile continues to see the equipment with an emotional slant, and, unfortunately, the music with an analytical view. Folks, don't go there. It's a very unhappy place where satisfaction does not exist.