Monitor 9 or 11, Energy RC 70 or Axiom 60

J

JohnDi

Audiophyte
I have a question regarding the above systems for a 5.1 basement home theater. I am going to listen to the following setup today

Front Loudspeakers Monitor 9 Or Monitor 11
Center Channel Monitor CC290
Rear Loudspeakers Monitor ADP 190
Subwoofer PDR 12
I have already heard the Energy RC-70 with the matching center and the dipole surrounds and they were very nice.

I cannot listen to the Axiom 60s until they were to arricve at my house so if anyone can give me a comparison that would be very helpful

The are going in a basement HT that will be 80% movies and sports 20% music, room size 16x20x7

I am going to power the system with a Onkyo SR674 95watts per channel.

Thanks in advance for everyone help
 
billy p

billy p

Audioholic Ninja
I am pretty sure you may need more power for the RC 70's, they do dip to 4ohm. The other two would be easier to drive, slighly more sensitive and responsive when driven in 8ohm. IMO the RC's are more in line with the Studio's, but this is only my opinion!

I've listened to the 50's and love them. Billy p:)
 
J

JohnDi

Audiophyte
Update, looks like it will be the monitor 7 or the 9, the 11 is out for now if I go Monitor
 
D

dem beats

Senior Audioholic
Update, looks like it will be the monitor 7 or the 9, the 11 is out for now if I go Monitor
I compaired the monitor gear myself and loved it! I did notice 2 things that made me go energy. The monitors(the drivers) were moving much much more to produce the same output that the energy speakers could, and in the room I demoed them I could close my eyes and notice a verry verry soft "chuffing". I think that word is a bit too extreme for what I actualy heard but in testing speakers I closed my eyes for every test and tried to find an image in the sound. My minds eye could see the front firing port. I thought this may be due to the higher movement in the drivers.. it wasn't enough to bother me, but in my basement set up I thought it would be even more noticable. I actualy thoght the sound was more noticable as we moved up the product line which is then why I decided on the energy set up. I even settled for the rc50 for fronts instead of the 70's.

This could probably be solved with a good setting on the crossover for the sub you choose.

Just listen for this next time you go back and listen to them. If you dont' notice it then they are perfect, I would say they have a slighly more crisp sound than the RC series.

As for power you can see my thread on the energy set up. I would give them as much power as you can. I wouldn't go back on my system now, but I didn't have to bring the speakers a little bit in closer to reach the desired loudness level. And they are missing the grunt I felt they had with a more powerfull amp while at the store. I am only about 20 hours into breaking them in though!!

Only speakers I found to be better were the paradigm studio and up. I think much of this had to do with the copious amount of drivers used especialy in the center channel. It would also be many thousands more to make that move up.
 
Warpdrv

Warpdrv

Audioholic Ninja
Only speakers I found to be better were the paradigm studio and up. I think much of this had to do with the copious amount of drivers used especialy in the center channel. It would also be many thousands more to make that move up.
Yeah.... but worth it... Just need more power, and Schwiiiiinnnngggg


Before I listened to the Studio's, I started with the Monitors... I really loved the 11's & the CC-390 those were just great, with a Marantz receiver... 85wpc...
Driven extremely well....
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top