Marantz SR8001 VS Denon AVR-3808CI VS HK AVR 745 VS ONKYO TX-SR805

mahdlokg

mahdlokg

Enthusiast
I'm looking to chage up my system and am looking at all these and trying to narrow it down. I know some will argue that are big there are price differences between them, but assume for argument's sake that all 4 are available now for between 1000.00 & 1200.00. ( A couple of these might be refurbed, but with manufaturer's warranty and I'm willing to live with that.)

I've been reading and weeding through forums alot. I'm personally leaning toward the Marantz because it has very good SQ, although I know all of these are supposed to. Who ever responds, if you would list your preference(s) either the ONLY one you would choose if you had to or your order of preference if you were choosing from 1-4.

I'd appreciate any advice or opinions. Thanks. :D
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
1) Marantz If I had to choose one, that would be it.
2) 805
3) 3808
4) 745
 
avaserfi

avaserfi

Audioholic Ninja
I would have the same order as J except HK wouldn't be on the list. I have never found a HK that I like.
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
I actually like the sound of H/K and the flexibility of their features. They just haven't won me over, and the same pretty much goes for Denon for me too.
 
Adam

Adam

Audioholic Jedi
Personally, I'd go with Onkyo...but that's just because I have experience (good, at that) with them. I'd be willing to try out Marantz because of their reputation, but only if the price was right. Denon...maybe, but that 3808 seems like too much money for what you get. As for HK, I'm with avaserfi...some people love HK, but I have yet to meet one that I like.
 
M

mdrew

Audioholic
I'm looking to chage up my system and am looking at all these and trying to narrow it down. I know some will argue that are big there are price differences between them, but assume for argument's sake that all 4 are available now for between 1000.00 & 1200.00. ( A couple of these might be refurbed, but with manufaturer's warranty and I'm willing to live with that.)

I've been reading and weeding through forums alot. I'm personally leaning toward the Marantz because it has very good SQ, although I know all of these are supposed to. Who ever responds, if you would list your preference(s) either the ONLY one you would choose if you had to or your order of preference if you were choosing from 1-4.

I'd appreciate any advice or opinions. Thanks. :D
I have not ever owned Denon, so I can only speculate over Denon products and base my thoughts on user reports. I will say that Denon seams to be the leader in HDMI equipped AVR’s that have the least amount of bugs and they are pretty quick to roll out firmware fixes for any reported bugs. Don’t hold your breath waiting for HK to address much of anything.

I have an SR/8001 and it was bought to replace an HK 745.

The first batch on SR’s have issues. Avoid them, including refurbs. The refurb re-sellers will tell you they come with the latest firmware, but do not believe them. It was just last week that the main service center in Illinois received the update from Japan to enable discrete 6/7 channel PCM. If you buy an 8001, make sure it’s from the latest run and you should have a reliable unit.

My HK 745 was plagued with problems. So many in fact that HK sent me a refund check. The 745 was a replacement unit for a defective 7300 that expired on me during a firmware update that Tech support recommended I install. The 7300 replaced a dead 7200 sibling. I have not had good luck with HK, so from my experience, I’d say to avoid anything but vintage HK’s. HK QC is suffering right now.

I had a 700 series Onkyo and I hated it. It gave me nothing but troubles. I sold it. I don’t even remember the model number. The new series of Onkyo HDMI 1.3 machines are not free of problems either. Just read up on them at AVS. There are a lot of folks with serious issues.

If you are a gambler and want to take chances on any of the above based strictly off feature sets, then you should consider what each unit has to offer.

HK has (and always have had) an abundance of user configurable features. They are the only AVR that I am aware of that will convert analogue audio to digital and allow you to apply base management to that input. The HK has independent X-over adjustability. The Marantz does not. I don’t know about the Denon or Onkyo models you are looking at.

The HK has its own room EQ program. I was not impressed with it, but you might be. Both the Denon and Marantz have Audyssey, which I absolutely love. Not sure about the Onkyo.

The HK has two LFE outputs, USB and I-pod interface. The Marantz does not. Not sure about the others.

Both the HK and Marantz 8001 have robust power supplies. Plenty for most home users including those of us with 4 ohm speakers. The Onkyo will have troubles with 4 ohm loads, if that is an issue for you. The Denon will do just fine as well. Denon is on par with HK and Marnatz on that playing field. Onkyo power supplies have always lagged a little.

The Marnatz has two HDMI outputs. Is that important to you?? None of the others do.

The Marantz does not up-convert video and all the others do, is that important to you??

The HK is limited to two HDMI inputs. Is that important to you??

The HK will not process discrete 6 or 7 channel uncompressed PCM audio off Blue Ray or HD/DVD via HDMI and all of the others will… Is that important to you??

The Denon will most likely process every audio format seeing how it is HDMI 1.3 and It will probably do it well. The Onkyo, again, read up on it as AVS. I believe it is having difficulties.

IF it were me, my order would be…..

3808Ci
SR/8001
Onkyo 805 (875 would be better yet)
HK 745
 
Seth=L

Seth=L

Audioholic Overlord
Both the HK and Marantz 8001 have robust power supplies. Plenty for most home users including those of us with 4 ohm speakers. The Onkyo will have troubles with 4 ohm loads, if that is an issue for you. The Denon will do just fine as well. Denon is on par with HK and Marnatz on that playing field. Onkyo power supplies have always lagged a little.
Where did you get the red information? The Onkyo should have no trouble at all with 4 ohm loads. It has a huge power supply (larger than the other receivers mentioned) and the other amplifier components aren't lacking either. The Onkyo TX-SR805 is the only receiver on this list that has THX Ultra II certification which ensures that it will meet certain power requirments in larger rooms, there is nothing that would lead me to believe that this 50 pound receiver could not handle a 4 ohm load.

Both the Denon and Marantz have Audyssey, which I absolutely love. Not sure about the Onkyo.
The Onkyo and Denon for sure feature the latest Audyssey auto-setup program.

There is a chance that the Onkyo may have some compatibility issues with HDMI devices, but this may not be entirely reliant on the Onkyo or any receiver listed. Some components with HDMI just don't mesh. Until one standard is found (never going to happen) then there will always be little hickups with components.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hemiram

hemiram

Full Audioholic
I would take the Onkyo, and then the Denon, the HK wouldn't be on my list. They seem to be weird for weirdness' sake, and too many memories of past HK warranty service. I've had only one Onkyo receiver, and it was great, until it was lost in the "great basement flood" of late 89, where I lost my huge, great sounding sub, the sub amp, my front channel amp, and receiver, CD player, and a cassette deck. Also wiped out the last of my LP's too. Every time I have had to buy a reciever since then, I couldn't pass up a deal on a Yamaha, or some other brand, so I haven't had an Onkyo for about 18 years now. I was very close to buying a TX-SR604 this last time though, but the Yamaha RX-V659 I did get was over $100 less, so I passed. One of these days though, I'm going to get one of those big Onkyo HT recievers.
 
M

mdrew

Audioholic
Where did you get the red information? The Onkyo should have no trouble at all with 4 ohm loads. It has a huge power supply (larger than the other receivers mentioned) and the other amplifier components aren't lacking either. The Onkyo TX-SR805 is the only receiver on this list that has THX Ultra II certification which ensures that it will meet certain power requirments in larger rooms, there is nothing that would lead me to believe that this 50 pound receiver could not handle a 4 ohm load.



The Onkyo and Denon for sure feature the latest Audyssey auto-setup program.

There is a chance that the Onkyo may have some compatibility issues with HDMI devices, but this may not be entirely reliant on the Onkyo or any receiver listed. Some components with HDMI just don't mesh. Until one standard is found (never going to happen) then there will always be little hickups with components.

Seth,

If you frequent the Axiom boards, you will see where Onkyo (any Onkyo) is not recommended for use with their M80’s. Axiom does a fair amount of bench testing different receivers so they can recommend one with confidence to use with their M80’s. If you did not know, the M80’s are an extremely efficient 4 ohm speaker that can run for extended periods of time with 700 WPC driving them. There are very few speakers that come close to them in regards to efficiency, so taking that into consideration, it’s reasonable to think of them as an “easy” 4 ohm load.

So to answer your question, “where did I get that information”, it would be from Axiom Audio and taking note of the issues other M80 owners have had with Onkyo receivers in general. I should not have specifically called out the 805, as that particular unit has not been tested. Maybe it will be different than past Onkyo’s?? Only time will tell.

Here is a cut and paste of a recent reply that Alan Loft (Axiom resident expert) made.

Quote ---------------

“JC is absolutely correct about not using the Onkyo 805 (or any Onkyo AV receiver) to drive the 4-ohm M80s and I regret that Brent suggested you could do so. As JC has advised you, the 805 will be fine driving the other channels (a 6-ohm load presents no problems for any AV receiver; it's as benign as an 8-ohm load) but you will need a separate 2-channel power amp for the M80s if you continue to use the Onkyo.

In Brent's defense, it's extremely misleading for Onkyo and some other manufacturers to suggest that their receivers will drive 4-ohm loads, THX "certified" or not. Moreover, the manufacturers (almost all of them) use the totally bogus "dynamic power output" spec to mislead consumers into thinking that an AV receiver will not only drive 4 ohms but even produce hundreds of watts into as low as 2-ohm impedances. The receivers will do so for a tiny fraction of a second, then shut down!

The only "dynamic" power output spec that has any meaning is "dynamic headroom" into 4 ohms, which is expressed in dB. That spec is seldom stated because the receiver's amplifier is rigorously stressed in that test.

Ever since I joined Axiom five years ago, I've been warning against using Onkyo AV models for the 4-ohm M80s (based on Axiom customer experience and lab tests by some magazines) as the Onkyos either go into severe current limiting when set to 4 ohms (producing perhaps 30 watts per channel or less), or they shut down.

As I've explained in previous posts, the AV receiver brands that Axiom has found able to drive the 4-ohm M80s without severe current limiting or shut-down are: Sherwood Newcastle (which we have bench-tested and which Axiom sells on-line); Denon, Harman/Kardon, B&K, Rotel, NAD, and McIntosh.

The AV receiver brands to avoid if you want to get the 4-ohm M80s are: Sony, Kenwood, Onkyo, JVC, and Yamaha (except for one or two models).

We do not have enough customer feedback on Marantz and Pioneer to make a recommendation. The one previous Pioneer with Mosfet output devices that would drive the M80s is no longer available.

p.s. to my previous post: In my list of recommended AV receiver brands that will drive the M80s, I forgot to include Outlaw Audio.”

Regards,

--------------------
Alan Lofft
Axiom Resident Expert”

--------------------------------end of quote.

I will admit that on paper the new line of Onkyo’s look VERY attractive. The 905 in particular. But unfortunately, I have been following the Onkyo threads at AVS; and even though a person must wade through mounds and mounds of that stinky stuff called BS to find pertinent and reliable information, there is a common trend that I can see quite clearly – the new Onkyo line has too many issues for me to spend my money on.

You can obviously believe and trust in who you choose to. However, I would caution you (or anyone) when using THX certifications as a basis or requirement when purchasing A/V equipment.

AS far as your hickup statement, you just confirmed my comments. ie: stick with a known product or manufacture with the best track record, which would not be Onkyo or HK.
 
mtrycrafts

mtrycrafts

Seriously, I have no life.
Seth,

If you frequent the Axiom boards, you will see where Onkyo (any Onkyo) is not recommended for use with their M80’s. Axiom does a fair amount of bench testing different receivers so they can recommend one with confidence to use with their M80’s. If you did not know, the M80’s are an extremely efficient 4 ohm speaker that can run for extended periods of time with 700 WPC driving them. There are very few speakers that come close to them in regards to efficiency, so taking that into consideration, it’s reasonable to think of them as an “easy” 4 ohm load.

.

Their sheet indicates 95 dB spl at 1W/1m, pretty good. You only need an amp to output 100watts into 4 ohms to get 115dB spl at 1m, less some for the listening seat.
I wonder what that 700w peak would do to the spl ?
Besides, 115dB spl are usually short burst peaks already. :D

Also, I don't see why an amp connection would be set to 4 ohms. Just leave it at 8 ohms.
 
no. 5

no. 5

Audioholic Field Marshall
Here is a cut and paste of a recent reply that Alan Loft (Axiom resident expert) made.

Quote ---------------


Ever since I joined Axiom five years ago, I've been warning against using Onkyo AV models for the 4-ohm M80s (based on Axiom customer experience and lab tests by some magazines) as the Onkyos either go into severe current limiting when set to 4 ohms (producing perhaps 30 watts per channel or less), or they shut down.

As I've explained in previous posts, the AV receiver brands that Axiom has found able to drive the 4-ohm M80s without severe current limiting or shut-down are: Sherwood Newcastle (which we have bench-tested and which Axiom sells on-line); Denon, Harman/Kardon, B&K, Rotel, NAD, and McIntosh.

The AV receiver brands to avoid if you want to get the 4-ohm M80s are: Sony, Kenwood, Onkyo, JVC, and Yamaha (except for one or two models).
Personally, for 4 Ohm speakers, I would use a external amp anyway.

But I am somewhat perplexed by Axiom's recommendations, do they bench test all the brands/models that they recommend? I wonder because all the Yamaha models that Audioholics (and others) have bench tested have handled a 4 Ohm lode, and yet Axiom dose not recommend them, but they do recommend Harman/Kardon, but I have seen H/K receivers that have difficulty with a 4 Ohm load.

It almost seems to me that the M80 may present a hard load drive, because just about every review I have read of a receiver that has a bench-test in it test output into 4 Ohms, and few fail, but Axiom recommends using some heavy duty gear for the M80.
Perhaps there are very low impedance dips, or extreme phase angles? :confused:

I'm not trying to be argumentative, I'm just being pedantic because Mr. Alan Loft's comments have perplexed me.
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
I will admit that on paper the new line of Onkyo’s look VERY attractive. The 905 in particular. But unfortunately, I have been following the Onkyo threads at AVS; and even though a person must wade through mounds and mounds of that stinky stuff called BS to find pertinent and reliable information, there is a common trend that I can see quite clearly – the new Onkyo line has too many issues for me to spend my money on.
I have not seen any lab test results for either the 8001 or the 805, but on paper the Onkyo looks much better and is apparently 17 lbs heavier. I would stick with the try and true Denon just for reliability. I am convinced that the 3808, 805, 8001 will all sound pretty much(may be not exactly) the same in a blind listening session when driving mid end 8 ohm speakers. If you need/or just want more power, you should just add a 2 or 3X200W power amplifier. Any of those 3 receivers should have no trouble driving most any surround channels.
 
mtrycrafts

mtrycrafts

Seriously, I have no life.
Perhaps there are very low impedance dips, or extreme phase angles? :confused:
.
Yes, maybe a good test that at least Stereophile can do with speakers would be in order to see what that nominal 4 ohms would bottom out at and how wide of a bandwidth. But, if Axiom's spec sheet is correct, it will do 95 dB spl in room. So, it is not like it needs a lot of power capacity at 4 ohms to be loud:D
 
Seth=L

Seth=L

Audioholic Overlord
My Teac could drive speakers spec'd like that to fairly intense levels, assuming that they don't have huge swings in impedance (which I assume they do given their efficiency, remember the Klipsch RF-7?;)). Weak amplification paired with very fluctuante loads equals sibilance and wimpy bass. The Axioms probably require a fair amount of control to perform well, more so that most receivers can do.

Has the OP considered seperates?

Yamaha RX-V661 paired with an Emotiva power amplifier would be ideal. Say the LPA-1 or possibly getting the RPA-1 to handle the front left and right and let the RX-V661 take care of the rest.;)
 
P

PENG

Audioholic Slumlord
Yes, maybe a good test that at least Stereophile can do with speakers would be in order to see what that nominal 4 ohms would bottom out at and how wide of a bandwidth. But, if Axiom's spec sheet is correct, it will do 95 dB spl in room. So, it is not like it needs a lot of power capacity at 4 ohms to be loud:D
One should also look carefully at the ohm vs frequency graph. From what (I admit not too many) I have seen those dips do not occur at the power hungry low frequency range. I still think this dip thing sometimes at blown out of proportion, i.e., as long as the speakers are rated 8 ohms nominal you are fine and don't worry about those dips. If they are nominally rated 4 ohms, then get an amp/or receiver that is rated for it.
 
mahdlokg

mahdlokg

Enthusiast
Marantz SR8001 VS Denon AVR-3808CI VS HK AVR 745 VS ONKYO TX-SR805

I really appreciate all the feedback. I'm so new to the forum thing, I didn't even know how to subscribe and didn't realize I had all these replies until today.

For reference point, I have the Canton Ergo line all the way around and no sub right now.(5.0 setup) They are rated 4-8 ohms on the back, which I'm guessing means they operate between 4-8 ohms. The mains DC-1002's are fairly efficient@ 89db. Just for fun, I hooked them up to my Kyocera R-661 receiver, rated @ an honest 65wpc, and I can't turn the volume past 2.5, not even approching clipping. They sound pretty darn good!

Point being from all I've been able to discover and due in part to your thoughtful responses, I've narrowed it down to the Marantz and the Onkyo. BTW, I really believe in sitting down and listening to the equipment and making these decisions on my own. I don't know where you live but where I live (Houston, TX), it is very difficult to find a dealer that either stocks the models I'm interested in or is willing to swap out what they have set up to put something new into the chain. I have found a local Integra dealer that is willing to let me bring a receiver home for a few days to try it out, (with credit card, of course). WOW, Real customer service! Now if I can find someone to lend me a comparable Marantz unit, I'll have a ballgame!

I appreciate any other responses, comments, etc. on this subject! :D
 
M

mdrew

Audioholic
You should seriously entertain the thought of spending some time at the AVS forum and read through the threads specific to the receivers you are considering.

As with any public forum, the complainers and whiners and are the first to speak up, so you will see a lot of nonsense. But, you will also find out just what problems each receiver that you are looking at might show up after you have it sitting on your rack.

As far as Onkyo goes, if I were to buy one, it would be the 905. The 905 can be found for around $1500. The 875 would be my second Onkyo choice. What I like about these two over the 805 is they have the Reon HQV chip, whereas the 805 uses the Genesis 8125 chip. The Genesis is fairly outdated and I have not been very impressed with it.

The Marantz has NO video up-conversion, so again, if you are looking for that, the Marantz does not have it. The 8001 does sound very good though. I love mine now that I have one that works correctly.

One promising receiver you might also consider (if you can wait) is the Sherwood Newcastle 972. The 972 is scheduled for delivery in Nov, but will most like be out early 08. The chip used for video processing has not been announced yet, but I would expect them to use the Reon, and hopefully the Realta (Realta is in the Denon 5910 dvd player). The most interesting thing about the 972 is it will come with Trinnov room EQ. Trinnov is highly regarded and very expensive. To have it in a sub 10K audio processor is surprising to say the least.

Marantz thread:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=804601

Denon 3808CI thread:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=860539

Onkyo NR905 thread:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=884772

Onkyo 875 thread:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=876635

Onkyo 805 thread:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=857502

Sherwood Newcastle 872 / 972 thread:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=785388
 
mtrycrafts

mtrycrafts

Seriously, I have no life.
One should also look carefully at the ohm vs frequency graph. From what (I admit not too many) I have seen those dips do not occur at the power hungry low frequency range. I still think this dip thing sometimes at blown out of proportion, i.e., as long as the speakers are rated 8 ohms nominal you are fine and don't worry about those dips. If they are nominally rated 4 ohms, then get an amp/or receiver that is rated for it.

Yes, absolutely agree.:D Stereophile usually do a good job of graphing this and other parameters. I looked but didn't see this speaker in question.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top