Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 vs. "4.2" with only 2 front speakers

B

bieneleve

Enthusiast
I have used the Klipsch ProMedia v2-400 (with the older preamp) system since 2001. It still sounds fantastic, great clarity and excellent bass. I have a Mac laptop and need to use a Y-connector for the stereo, so I decided not to connect the rear speakers recently. I was wondering how the new 2.1 system compares to this setup? The v2-400 has a dual 8" sub while the 2.1 has a single 6.5". Does anyone have any experience with both of these models?
 
Last edited:
krzywica

krzywica

Audioholic Samurai
I have used the Klipsch ProMedia v2-400 (with the older preamp) system since 2001. It still sounds fantastic, great clarity and excellent bass. I have a Mac laptop and need to use a Y-connector for the stereo, so I decided not to connect the rear speakers recently. I was wondering how the new 2.1 system compares to this setup? The v2-400 has a dual 8" sub while the 2.1 has a single 6.5". Does anyone have any experience with both of these models?
The newer one likely has +3db's more muddy output than the older one....
 
sholling

sholling

Audioholic Ninja
I've had the 2.1, the old 4.1 and the Ultra 5.1. The 2.1 had a single 6.5 that was boomy mainly because that was just too little sub for the volumes that customers drove it. The 4.1 added 2 more satellites and upgraded the sub to a dual driver 6.5" sub. The Ultra 5.1 had a dual 8" sub. There were a few variations such as a Star Wars edition 2.1 and a dual sub 4.2 version but I'm not aware of a 4.2 with 8" drivers. Honestly I'd stay with what you have until the amp dies or you get tired of them. Even if/when the amp eventually gives out there are instructions on the web for repairing it.

v2 400

Once you decide you want better then it's time to step up to a small amp/receiver with studio monitors and real subwoofer.
 
Last edited:
B

bieneleve

Enthusiast
Once you decide you want better then it's time to step up to a small amp/receiver with studio monitors and real subwoofer.
And how do I do that from a Mac? I have digital and analog out. What would I get for an amp if I'm not playing CDs, records, or the radio?
 
dkane360

dkane360

Audioholic Field Marshall
I use the digital out from my MBP to my Integra receiver. You would need a mini-optical to optical cable that plugs into your combination optical and analog 3.5mm out.
 
B

bieneleve

Enthusiast
I use the digital out from my MBP to my Integra receiver. You would need a mini-optical to optical cable that plugs into your combination optical and analog 3.5mm out.
Sure, but I'm looking for strictly a stereo amp. Does anyone know one with digital in (at a reasonable price)?
 
dkane360

dkane360

Audioholic Field Marshall
Sure, but I'm looking for strictly a stereo amp. Does anyone know one with digital in (at a reasonable price)?
Sorry, I don't know of any off the top of my head. It's probably easier just to find a powerful used receiver and use it for stereo only.
 
sholling

sholling

Audioholic Ninja
Sorry, I don't know of any off the top of my head. It's probably easier just to find a powerful used receiver and use it for stereo only.
I agree and in most cases you'll have some kind of bass management.
 
ski2xblack

ski2xblack

Audioholic Samurai
two channel w/ digital input

Sure, but I'm looking for strictly a stereo amp. Does anyone know one with digital in (at a reasonable price)?
How about one of these:

http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/receivers/hk-3490

It lacks bass management, but does have digi inputs, rare for two channel receivers. Robust amp section. Relatively cheap. This plus a couple good monitors will leave your current Klipsch system in the dust.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top