Yes, thank you... I was actually looking at the reference 8" from dayton too. For a 2.1 speaker setup for my computer listening, should I just as well build a sealed enclosure instead?
I have modeled your Dayton driver. That driver is optimal for a sealed enclosure, of about one third cu. ft. It gives an F3 of 59 Hz. However the highest you can get Qtc is 0.38. a Qtc of less than 0.5 is over damped and will sound very dry.
That driver does not work well as a ported enclosure. the lowest ripple I can get is 9db. There really is no significant gain over sealed, as sealed and vented have the same output at 25 Hz, and the sealed is smoother. The vented enclosure is 0.5 cu. ft, but would require the construction of a slot vent.
I took a look at the Tang Band driver and that driver is a total waste of resources. Its parameters just do not stack up for anything promising, and any enclosure you design will not tune properly. You can not get two nice impedance peaks and QL is 7. Sealed the driver is hopeless with an F3 just below 80 Hz. I would scratch that driver straight off the list. It is not worth putting any effort into.
If I were you, I would look around for something more promising. If you are going to put sweat equity into a project, it is a pity if is hobbled right out of the starting gate. The fun of DIY is the creation of superior products.
The most promising design of your options is the Dayton driver sealed. However, as I stated I think you can do better.
If you want I can make you pdfs of the data, but I did not find those drivers promising enough to proceed further.