Default Riser
3/19/2014
Would rather send via PM, but can do it in the thread if you like. Don't want it to sound like I am being a jerk about it because we don't agree on the subject.
I don't agree with your assessment. You are talking about coupling not decoupling. They are two completely different things. In the case of a sub which is generating both vibration from the driver creating sound AND force exerted on the cabinet by the driver moving. IMO, you don't want COUPLING for a sub. The batting beneath the riser isn't doing anything either. In regards to the legs, all they do is give smaller points of contact, but they still transmit the vibration, though the frequencies that are transmitted are likely modified, vibration still gets through. Tap a piece of wood with a hammer and see how much vibration is transmitted to the surface beneath. Then do the same with a stack of your batting.
Greater surface area of contact? It is FOAM - foam chosen specifically for absorbing transmitted energy (why else would they ship sensitive electronics packed in foam?), thus it does not transmit that energy to the contacting surface. I've worked on engineering projects for moving machinery required controlling vibration and noise both for the equipment itself and for those working around the equipment.
My sub weighs 147 lbs and does not transmit vibration at all because of its design.
-John
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Default Re: Riser
3/18/2014
Hey John, in no way did I think you a jerk. Actually, the opposite. Judging by your number of posts I think it is safe to assume you have been in this game for a long time and possess considerable knowledge as well as experience. I can learn from that. But, that doesn't mean I don't have my own thoughts based on my research and understanding of my project and what I want it to accomplish.
I chose my products carefully: Roxul Paperless (just means no paper on one side of insulation) Stone Wool Insulation r-15. Rock Wool is highly recommended because of its high absorption qualities of vibration, sound and air resonation. The physical vibration of the floor, walls or furniture is created by sound coming from the speaker. In addition, there is physical vibrations that are caused by the cab and these are transferred to the floor. These negative attributes can cause excessive masking/mud/build-ups in the low mids. This is often the issue of bad arrangement or placement, such as the floor. The floor is excited by the vibrations of a sub sitting directly on it. The floor then becomes a resonating surface. It is my 'hopes' that the Roxul tightly compressed inside its housing will absorb sound and physical vibrations transferred through the MDF. Speaking of MDF, it is the most dense building material available. It is very much considered a non-resonant material which is why it is widely used in sound products or sound furniture. I wanted it all wrapped in an additional layer of some sort of sound deadening product. My research resulted in Performix Plasti Dip Rubber Coating. When it comes to sound, the manufacturer claims it is used in conjunction with other materials to provide an absorbing sound barrier. If you search it, car audio enthusiasts use it on their interior and exterior to reduce road noise enhancing their audio. Now for the debate. The legs. I specifically chose the 4x4 Finials because they were pressure treated- dense and hard. I wanted the project/riser raised off the floor. I am hopeful and trusting that my picks of materials will do their work and in the end, little vibration will make its way to the bottom of the legs. I hear ya and agree that if you hold one end of a 2x4 raised the other on the ground, when you hit it with a hammer, the vibrations will resonate and grow as it gets closer to the bottom. I want to dampen the hammer avoiding the vibrations in the first place. I do believe, and forgive me if I don't know the terminology as well as you do, that raising the riser off the floor will benefit the sound and control the wasted speaker energy that travels through floors. The finials are rounded at the top (bottom) and with the weight will imprint nicely into the carpet, which is what I want.
You mentioned a few things- that the batting will not do anything, foam should have been used and again- the legs. I researched both foam and batting. Cheap rigid foam (4x8) will transfer sound. If you are talking about the sound rated 'pillow' or 'couch' foam that would work just as well. Then you have specific Sound Panels which I could not afford. Rather, it seemed absurd to pay for a pack of it for only a few square feet, lol. The batting I used was highly recommended for this specific purpose. You are right, Styrofoam is used for package safety, and effectively so. Corning panels or similar work very well, as you said. But Sound on Sound states foam traps are ok, but you'll get better performance if you build some DIY corner traps using slabs of Rockwool two to four inches thick.
John, I very much researched this before I decided on my build. I have bookmark after bookmark saved so I could reference and re-reference. Again, I don't claim this will work a miracle or even work. But I will settle for a slight improvement. As our house is laid out, its not very conducive for Home Theater. But when I sit in my office, adjoining to living area, and I hear more low bass frequencies than I do in the living room, there is a problem. I think of the lost frequencies in the other room, I think of the wasted energy and negative vibrations... etc. All I want to accomplish is maintaining my bass in the room it is meant and maybe tightening the bass. I am very happy with my Polk 40lb dsw550wi. Now I want to optimize it, maybe, just maybe this will.
Very Best Regards,
Brian
BTW- I think this should be posted in the forums. I appreciated your message and info to me... if you do reply, I look forward to your inputs and maybe corrections to my way of thinking. Keep this in mind, I just started building my AV System a little over a month ago. Although it is modest compared to other systems, I am quite pleased with it. That means I have only been exposed to all this for a few weeks, lol. I think others may learn as much as I hope to if posted.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Default Re: Riser
3/18/2014
Brian,
I understand the approach you've taken and I definitely don't think you "under thought" it, it is just the mechanism by which that vibration is transmitted IMO. I agree with what you are saying, just not sure if it is going to work as decoupling from the floor more effectively, and I've tried both ways. I found that speaker spikes continued to transmit enough vibration, even when stood on rubber pads, foam, etc...
As a teen (yes, that was a while ago, but yielded some interesting non-scientific results) my dad always had these big, behemoth 12" 3-way horrors in the living room on our hardwood floors and I always thought they sounded horrible (lol at 16 an unprofessed audiophile already). It struck me that part of the problem was them sitting too low and the other was the cabinets being directly coupled to the floor. Without telling dad, I experimented with different things beneath the speakers until I achieved what I felt was an improvement. Interestingly they were just some Sorbothane pads made specifically for this that I found at a high end audio shop - sort of a big square "coaster" that had 8 small raised contact points on them that you set the speaker on, one each corner. Dad didn't notice it IMO, but it opened my eyes to ways of treating speakers to achieve better audio IMO, "tweaking" for lack of a better term. Now the floor no longer vibrated with the speaker and as you've also mentioned, the low midbass improved considerably.
My more recent experience with this phenomenon was a rather large sonotube sub I had. It was a huge down firing 15" beast designed by a friend that shook everything in the house (~1800 sf). Knocking things off shelves in the next room and vibrating doors and windows throughout the house. This was sitting on a concrete slab and always sounded kind of muddy in the midbass to me and I was looking for an improvement. I picked up an Auralex Gramma because I already use MoPads for my mains, and MUCH to my surprise, it cleaned up that midbass as well as reduced much of the vibration elsewhere in the house. I figured with it sitting on concrete it wouldn't have been an issue, but the results said otherwise. I bought it as an experiment and ended up keeping it.
http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l1...T/IMG_2910.jpg
The new sub is a dual opposed sealed design with a super heavy duty cabinet and it literally does not vibrate at all even with the drivers going crazy. Kind of nice and sounds better than the previous one with music. I tried this sub in the same setup on the Gramma and it sounded no different with or without, so that sort of confirmed to me that the transmission of that vibration is a big part of the culprit of that muddiness. It is the other things in the room/house, etc... exhibiting sympathetic resonances at various frequencies - doors in the room would shake noticeably around 16-18hz, the large panes of glass in the mid to low 20s (which was a problem with many current movies), the adjacent, step up from the slab, wood floor in the high 30s. It was pretty interesting. The Gramma dramatically reduced and/or eliminated many of those issues - then I upgraded to the current sub
As for a riser, some have found that bringing the sub off the floor helps with various room modes, though that depends on the room as well, but that makes sense to me functionally also as sub placement can be quite important. Short of taking measurements in room at various heights though, I think how tall is sort of difficult to pin down.
Wasn't sure how it would come off me questioning your idea, so I didn't want it to degrade into something useless. If you decide to post our conversation in the thread, I have no problem with that. Now I am even more curious to hear your results though
-JG