Can someone please explain the reason why my dads HD looks worse than my HD? Here are the two set-ups:
Mine:
Charter Cable HD running into an LG 42LB1DR HD 42" LCD t.v.
Looks absolutely stunning. Definitely has a "wow" factor to it.
His:
Dish Network HD running in to a Sony FD Trinitron WEGA KV-34XBR800 34" t.v. (standard CRT "fatback" t.v.)
Looks pretty good, but is still a little "fuzzy". Looks only marginally better than a DVD. No real "wow" factor.
Both t.v.'s are capable of producing a 1080i HD picture, so why the difference? I am sure it has to do with the inherent differences between LCD vs. CRT, but I don't know enough about it to explain to him.
Thanks in advance!!