Just so you know, I do get your point. Both sides have some pretty goofy ideas and both have their fringe extremists. It's not just one side being unreasonable, I agree.
However this topic of violating someone's bodily autonomy- taking away someone's sovereignty over their own person falls firmly on the right and is fueled by religious ideology. Women are being denied a choice while simultaneously being denied medical coverage for preventive care and affordable birth control. That's just wrong in my opinion.
100% in agreement with you on this issue of woman's rights it's hypocritical and its not done based on some issue that's come up over the years it's being based off of right winged religious value systems. I can't get behind the conservative party on that.
This is the land of the free. You should be able within reason to do whatever the fu#$% you want.
I'd prefer government just stay out of this stuff period but since that's not going to happen this is one area where I think big gov should set the precedent. That has been working just fine for over 50 years nobody has been crying about Roe vs Wade. Until now
My own dumbass party had to stir the pot. Or maybe not there's months before a decision was supposed to be handed down. They were still in deliberations
Thanks to some dumbass leaking this tho and illegal protesting done at Supreme Courts private homes we may just get a 100% guarantee it's going to happen.
Because now they are in a no win position. If they pass it did they do it not to be intimidated
If they don't pass it is it because they were intimidated. We will never know. The process was tainted and unfortunately we may never see there true colors either way.
which is exactly why that law is in place of not intimidating really any court on any level.
still why stir the pot at all? F#$%ing RHINOS man