Wall Street Journal editorial page offered a "correction" to its initial opinion of the 10 year old rape victim having to flee her own state for an abortion or have being forced to carry to term and likely die. To number of members of this forum the problem is that the child was not armed, of course, in the first place.
>>>The Journal apparently decided that it might be appropriate to address the snafu with some form of the verb “to correct” and published a new editorial on Wednesday evening with the headline, “
Correcting the Record on a Rape Case.” Here’s the opening paragraph:
Boldface added to highlight the Journal mischaracterizing its own work. The first two sentences of the original editorial, after all, read like this: “All kinds of fanciful tales travel far on social media these days, but you don’t expect them to get a hearing at the White House. That’s nonetheless what seems to have happened Friday as President Biden signed an executive order on abortion.”
You call that “wondering”? ...<<<
