mike c said:
the Rotel RB-03 has a rating of 70w x 2 (20-20 .03% 8ohms)
and then say it is bridgeable to 150w x 1 (20-20 1% 4ohms)
the Rotel RB 1070 has a rating of 120w x 2 (20-20 .03% 8ohms)
and then say it is bridgeable to 330w x 1 (20-20 1% 4ohms)
so what is the bridged output in 8ohms?
why put the 4 ohm rating when it says in the manual to only use 8 ohm and above for the speakers.
isn't that the same as saying this car can go 300kph if you remove the weight that is the engine?
I totally agree with you. The way they spec the RB1070's output is confusing. Having said that the formula you asked about would be:
P=(V²/Z)*P.F. (or P=I²*Z*P.F., or P=V*I*P.F.)
P=Power, I=current, V=Voltage, Z=impedance, P.F.=cosine of the phase angle between the Voltage and current phasor, this angle is dependent on the characteristics of the impedance, that is how resistive, inductive, and capacitive the load is)
In this case it is easier to explain using P=(V²/Z)*P.F.
Normally (not bridged), 330W into 4 ohms would imply 165W into 8 ohms because given the same maximum voltage output, doubling the impedance will result in halving the output power.
When bridged, the amp's output voltage would double, since P=(V²/Z)*P.F., power would increase by 4 times and current would double. It is not realistic to expect the 26.25 lbs or even much larger amps, to be able to handle that kind of current, and that's why 4 ohm speakers should not be used for bridged mode. I strongly suspect the 330W into 4 ohms spec is an error, it most likely meant 330W into 8 ohms.