YES! You still get the EMP sub which is a new design and a significantly better performer than the RBH equivalent in the TK series.
Hi gene, looking at the graphic, the sub looks like RBH's TS10-AP or an MS10.1 clone, hard to tell from the angle of the pic. If so, then it definitely superceded the TS10 from the TK series, but the TS is the inexpensive sub that RBH makes(made), the MS10.2 from the CT series is a nicer sub with dual 10" drivers.
I was under the impression that the TK series was actually quite different (though appearing similar) than the EMP line though. RBH TK's use a Fibreglass woofer, silk dome tweeter and kraft paper sub
The EMP's use polygraphite woofers, fabric dome tweeters and compressed Cellulose Composite subs. Much like RBH iuses in their builder series in wall's. I am sure you'll agree that these two cone materials sound quite different, as are the crossovers.
EMP's are nice and are a good value for money but to suggest, "(identical to TK-5C except cosmetics)" I think is a bit misleading. You guys have auditioned and reviewed the TK5's and 5CT's, I think you'll agree that there is quite a discernable difference.
PLease correct me if I am wrong and I apologize if I have raised questions for potential customers, in Audioholics defense, the EMP's are a fanatastic product with an excellent price tag, I just think the direct comparisson was a bit off.
Cheers, keep up the killer RBH reviews!
Ever think about reviewing the Signature in-walls? 6000's maybe 6100's?