Not sure if I really added much or just basically restated by initial question but hopefully that helps. Basically, what draws me to the Edge is the simplicity of it. It has the inputs I need and only requires the one output (plus my audio output). The only thing that's really up in the air is how to process the audio signal without having to get a full-blown pre/pro or receiver anyway.
Matt
Well, to process a signal, you need a processor. You also need a preamp. Your EDGE doesn't have a volume knob, if you haven't noticed. Your current receiver, or whatever it is, will be both preamp and processor. That's what a pre/pro is, preamp+processor. A receiver is both those things, + an amplifier.
The DVDO Edge product and the likes are made to bridge the gap between older analog (but superlative) audio components that the owner may not want to discard and the newer digital formats. Say, McIntosh analog pre-pro or Denon 5803, etc. Most receivers and especially pre-pros in the $1000+ range have good inbuilt video processing that will be on par or better than the DVDO. For example, Integra DTC 9.8.
I have the opposite impression. That for the best video processing, you want a stand alone. Sure the Anthem v2 is very nice, but um how much is that? You can't compare that price point. If I did compare that price point with standalone VP, I'd get the $4500 Lumagen XD, a dream item of mine.
I am also under the impression that the Integra's Reon implementation is useful, and is a nice side bonus, but will still be inferior to the Edge. Now, something like the Denon AVP scores very well in VP, but that's $7,000.
That said, a good quality source paired with a good display and properly calibrated for the room, will eliminate any need for processing the video for all but the most anal-retentive of folks.
He has a dedicated front projection setup. I do as well. If I actually watched television broadcasting, DVD, whatever, I'd already own a standalone VP. But, I only watch Bluray on it. Yet, if I was very rich, I'd still get the Lumagen for the CMS
alone.