D

dnaps

Enthusiast
Can someone please explain to me why so many DVDs are coming out in widescreen ratios of 2.35:1 or 2.40:1? I recently purchased a LCD flat panel and spent several nights trying to figure out why I still had black bars at the top and bottom. I dont want to risk burn-in and I refuse to use the zoom feature. After some reading and goin through all my DVDs i realized the only ones that would play "correctly" with a full screen were the DVDs with 1.85:1 or very close to that .....and there werent many. I guess the question is will this continue to be the case or will we see more dvds that target consumers with 16:9 tvs?
 
GlocksRock

GlocksRock

Audioholic Spartan
Good question, I just got a new DLP tv and was wondering the same thing, although I don't run the risk of burn in, I still am annoyed by the bars at the top and bottom.

Maybe the director seems to think that the movie would look better if shot in a wider ratio.
 
racquetman

racquetman

Audioholic Chief
dnaps said:
Can someone please explain to me why so many DVDs are coming out in widescreen ratios of 2.35:1 or 2.40:1? I recently purchased a LCD flat panel and spent several nights trying to figure out why I still had black bars at the top and bottom. I dont want to risk burn-in and I refuse to use the zoom feature. After some reading and goin through all my DVDs i realized the only ones that would play "correctly" with a full screen were the DVDs with 1.85:1 or very close to that .....and there werent many. I guess the question is will this continue to be the case or will we see more dvds that target consumers with 16:9 tvs?
Movies weren't made to be watched on a television. They were meant to be watched in a theater in a wide aspect ratio. Why? Because that is visually the most captivating. The directors decide what ratio they want to shoot their film in. Some prefer the 2.35:1, others a little wider hence the occasional 2.39:1 or 2.40:1. What you'll notice is that most of these "wider" movies are the action movies because more can be seen in a frame the wider it is. The comedies and dramas will be 1.85:1 most of the time. Part of them is chopped to get to the 1.78:1 (16 x 9) of your TV when released on DVD. It is too little to worry about and then no black bars.

I want to see the whole movie, so I put up with the black bars on movies wider than 1.78:1. Some can't handle it so they buy the pan and scan fullscreen version and miss part of the film. You won't see this changing. Like I said, movies weren't made for TV watching (as far as a perfect fit goes). If you really want the cinema experience, you need a front projector and a screen, not a TV.

I wouldn't worry about screen burn-in. That is mostly a myth. Your LCD can handle the black bars as long as they aren't there 24/7.
 
D

dnaps

Enthusiast
thanks alandamp. the info was helpful and i understand directors using different ratios, i guess i just figured that with home theaters becoming so popular that 16:9 (or 1.78:1) would become more of a standard in the future.
 
R

ruadmaa

Banned
LCD Burn-in???

dnaps said:
Can someone please explain to me why so many DVDs are coming out in widescreen ratios of 2.35:1 or 2.40:1? I recently purchased a LCD flat panel and spent several nights trying to figure out why I still had black bars at the top and bottom. I dont want to risk burn-in and I refuse to use the zoom feature. After some reading and goin through all my DVDs i realized the only ones that would play "correctly" with a full screen were the DVDs with 1.85:1 or very close to that .....and there werent many. I guess the question is will this continue to be the case or will we see more dvds that target consumers with 16:9 tvs?
Your LCD tv is not subject to burn-in no matter how many times you watch black bars. It is not a problem with LCD technology. So watch any type of picture you wish without worrry.

As to why there are so many wide screen DVDs, they are simply duplicating the theatrical versions of the films being shown.

Incidentally, most computer screens these days are LCD, when was the last time you heard of burn-in on a computer screen???
 
D

dnaps

Enthusiast
as far as the "burn-in" comment.... i was just reading it out of the dell owners manual. of course dell not knowing anything about their products does not suprise me the least bit
 
nova

nova

Full Audioholic
dnaps said:
thanks alandamp. the info was helpful and i understand directors using different ratios, i guess i just figured that with home theaters becoming so popular that 16:9 (or 1.78:1) would become more of a standard in the future.
I believe that is what will happen,.... with TV programing. As for films, personally I like the 2.35:1 or greater and do not mind the black bars.
 
Rock&Roll Ninja

Rock&Roll Ninja

Audioholic Field Marshall
Its the choice of the filmmakers. 2.35:1 Is used in most action/adventure filsm with lots of spectacle to see from left to right. 1.85:1 Is common with comedy & dramas, where taller images allow for closer close-ups of actors. This isn't carved in stone, Jurassic Park had a 1.85 because Spielberg liked "tall" dinosaurs. Then you occassionally get the oddball 1.66:1 (Robocop, RobinHood prince of thieves).

I think fewer films will use the 1.78 ratio as it becomes stigmatized as the "TV movie" ratio (and serious movie makers don't wanna be thought-of as TV movie makers).
 
D

dnaps

Enthusiast
thanks again for all input. action films make up most of my library so it looks like ill just have to get use to the bars
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top