Mule, hope you don't mind. I cleaned up the post a bit.
Mulester7: The new subs offer huge magnets, but need lots of power to get them to move. With larger magnets and more power, you notice tighter, more controlled bass. You can actually over do it, though, with too large a sub"
Total agreement, Buck, but how large does the subwoofer element have to become for the effect to ascend from being support, enhancement, and accentuation for treasured mains, and become a standout act?
I've had homemade subs using 25 inch woofers that were rated to 300 continuous being pushed by 1000. I've had 18 inch woofers rated to 1000 continuous being hit by the same 1000. Both were in quite decent boxes with shelf tuning.
Are you kidding me? 25 inch? I know dual 18" passive subs with 2000 watt Mackie amps do well in clubs, but are absolutely overkill unless you are running some Electro Voice monitors in all corners of the house. We had a few sets of those dual 18" subs in college when djing dances in the student union. We'd set up the system, and would take hours to hone in the sound, because they just didn't sound that good at low levels. They required studio 31 band eq's to iron out. 15's are pushing it IMO in house, but 25"? Geezus
I'm now to the point I feel 12 inch, 4 ohm woofers are the best for the job to be done in the home and be called "sub". Tough and tight 12 inch woofers made to car stereo requirements for longevity, being popped by a strapped amp.
I can relate with you here. Some nice JL Audio or Cadence subs can't be beat in that aspect. Have you seen the new JL Audio home sub? Wow, but get out the checkbook.