DoD to Release Video of 9/11 Plane Crash into Pentagon...

Rock&Roll Ninja

Rock&Roll Ninja

Audioholic Field Marshall
It took the government five years to make a film that could fake an airplane crashing into the pentagon? Lazy lazy lazy, it only took them 4 years to fake a moon landing. ;)
 
racquetman

racquetman

Audioholic Chief
Rock&Roll Ninja said:
It took the government five years to make a film that could fake an airplane crashing into the pentagon? Lazy lazy lazy, it only took them 4 years to fake a moon landing. ;)
Man, I knew that video was fake!! There is no way we ever landed on the moon ;) .
 
Rock&Roll Ninja

Rock&Roll Ninja

Audioholic Field Marshall
alandamp said:
Man, I knew that video was fake!! There is no way we ever landed on the moon ;) .
Of course we did, in 1987.... (exactly when the illuminati told us to do so).
 
1

10010011

Senior Audioholic
Rock&Roll Ninja said:
It took the government five years to make a film that could fake an airplane crashing into the pentagon? Lazy lazy lazy, it only took them 4 years to fake a moon landing. ;)

You mean there is not really an MTV flag on the Moon?:eek: ;) :p :cool:
 
C

cyberbri

Banned
The footage released is the same footage from 4.5 years ago, just longer, and now with another bit from another camera (at a bad angle) about 10' closer than the original.

Here's something on the Pentagon strike, about 5 minutes long:
http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main
It includes the original security camera footage that was unofficially leaked at first - the recently-released footage is the same, although there was another one released from security camera about 10' closer. Near the end this flash movie talks about all the other videos from security and traffic/freeway cameras that were snatched up immediately and never released.
 
b_panther_g

b_panther_g

Audioholic
Questions, Questions, and More Questions

There are many unanswered questions about exactly what happened on 9/11. There will always be unanswered questions.

Also, just because some people have some questions, doesn’t mean that there aren’t legitimate answers. In other words…

Questions about that day do not mean there’s a cover up. It simply means that the people asking the questions are not satisfied with the answers.

I have questions about what happened. But my biggest question is…

Why haven’t the major media sat everyone down and really grilled the men/women in charge of national security about exactly what happened?​

Small/independent journalists have pointed out what appear to be discrepancies. (The above linked video is an example)

I find it kind of unsettling. If an average person rights a book that’s false or is accused of a high profile crime, a media giant will be right there.

Mr. Media Giant will do a bunch of research and gather the evidence. Then they’ll get an exclusive interview and grill that person about exactly what they did or didn’t do. Every discrepancy will be expose and just about everything will be laid bare.

Well what about 9/11? What happened to national security on that day? And why hasn’t there been that in-your-face investigative reporting that everyone else is subject too?

Is Mr. Media Giant scared to ask?

If so, why?

If not, then why haven’t they done it?

Sorry for the long post about this uncomfortable subject. I just needed to ask the questions.

Later,
Panther
 
warhummer

warhummer

Junior Audioholic
b_panther_g said:
Well what about 9/11? What happened to national security on that day? And why hasn’t there been that in-your-face investigative reporting that everyone else is subject too?
I think the information is already out there. I can tell you what was going on with some of the Navy's Aviation Squadrons that morning. In reality, the answer is simpler than most people think. I was sitting at a stop light, waiting to get on the 101 to head into Pt Mugu (California) when I heard about the first plane hitting the WTC (about 6 AMish local time if I remember correctly). My squadron was hosting an air-defense conference for our battle group in preparation for our upcoming work-ups and deployment later that spring (for 2002).

The bottom line is that, at least at the "shooter" level, the infrastructure did not exist for command and control by NORAD for someone to pick up the phone and say "Shoot that airliner down". Our operations officer worked some serious magic that day to establish a line of communications with NORAD and get our airplanes in the air to cover the West Coast (I was a pilot in an E-2C Hawkeye Squadron at the time). In no uncertain terms, the US had five aircrew in the their late twenties to early thirties, coupled with some F-16s out of Buckley AFB to cover the western United States. We were executing an unrehearsed mission for which we didn't have a script. We briefly began to intercept an airplane enroute to LAX who wasn't talking to anybody. If it wasn't for the professionalism and skill of both the aircrew and ground controllers involved, I chill to think what might have happened to some innocent civillians. Luckily we were able to get a hold of the airplane. By the time the second Hawkeye had gotten airborne, the FAA had managed to ground all air traffic.

I can go into more detail and play-by-play as I remembered it, but quite simply, there was no "conspiracy" or other B.S. story for what happened that day. We got caught with our pants down, pure and simple.

Now, I'm going to go back to sipping my beer on my back porch.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top