Do I Need A New Receiver?

G

Gratefulvol

Audiophyte
I am in the process of building a modest home theater in what will be a dedicated media room in our new house. The room is 15x12 with 8 ft ceilings. The speakers I will be driving are the Andrew Jones Pioneer with the towers up front. I also plan on getting an SVS SB-1000. I have an older HK 230 receiver from an old setup I had. The receiver has no HDMI or room eq. It does however have 7.1 analog in/out.

So my thoughts were instead of paying money for a new receiver I could a lot my funds toward possibly a Oppo 103 while using it for HDMI switching with the 2 hdmi inputs and just go analog out to the receiver via the Oppo. Or I could just go with an HDMI switch and possibly get an external amp possibly and Emotiva UPA-500.

It appears that without getting into $1k and up receivers that analog inputs or out are not readily available. So it seems as though my old HK actually has some more flexibility than a new receiver.

Without have ever experiencing Audyssey, YPAO, or MCACC,I can't really say how much the room eq would benefit vs manual calibration. Does it make that big of a difference?

I have purchased a Denon X1000 that was on sale last week at Best Buy for $349 as I will only be running 5.1 and this has the Audyssey XT which seems to get good reviews. So am I better off keeping what I got with the Denon, looking for a different receiver or going with one of the options mentioned above with keeping the old HK?
 
G

Gratefulvol

Audiophyte
yes, I looked at the refurb units but do not think I would use 7.1 plus the x1000 has the Audyssey XT vs EQ and has 3 year warranty vs 1. So for my needs if getting a new receiver seems like the X1000 would be better than the E400. But again, do I even need to upgrade my AVR from the HK?
 
R

ReUpRo

Full Audioholic
The HK while competitive when new is now falling behind on technology. Specifically. The lack of room correction. Audyssey XT does a pretty decent job of applying correction filters. IMO, it helps a lot. That said, it is not perfect and some people prefer other flavors of room correction and some people are underwhelmed by automatic room correction altogether, preferring to keep it disabled. You need to try it for yourself.

The Audyssey Dynamic Eq is a feature that changes the relative volume of frequencies based on Master Volume level. Based on the Equal Loudness concept and IMO, the best feature I've used of late. Even at lower listening levels the music and movie seem to have the bass kick and detail of loud listening levels. I'm very impressed with this feature.

With the Pioneer speakers crossed over to the sub at 80Hz, the X1000 will easily handle the load. You shouldn't need an external amp.

If you connect the X1000 and a Blu-ray disc player via HDMI, you will not benefit from the fancy analog audio processing (in the player). Just pick a BDP in the $100-150 range with good (accurate) video output.
 
Pyrrho

Pyrrho

Audioholic Ninja
If you are good at manual setup (which most people are not), then the automatic setup is a matter of convenience, plus the option of using whatever EQ it has (which some people do not like, while others love it; that should give you a clue about its importance or lack thereof). The Oppo is a great player, and so using it with your old HK seems like a good idea, as long as you don't mind having to set things up manually, and are good at doing it.

As for the price of receivers that have the multichannel analog inputs that you want, it is true that they tend to be expensive, but you can save hundreds on a closeout deal, like this one for $700 delivered:

Yamaha AVENTAGE RX-A1020 7.2-channel home theater receiver with Apple AirPlay® at Crutchfield.com

It is last year's model, which is why it is discounted. If I were buying a receiver at that price point, it is what I would buy.

But it is unnecessary to buy a receiver; going with the Oppo would save you money.

Now, since you bought the Denon, if you already have a BD player and do not really need the Oppo, that is even less expensive. But you give up the great video processing of the Oppo, which, depending on what you run through it, may or may not really matter. It also plays SACDs and DVD-Audio discs, which may or may not matter to you.

The long and the short is, what you should do depends on what you want, and on how much you are willing to pay.

With the Oppo you would have all of the audio formats of BD. And so you would with the Denon. Or with pretty much any other new surround receiver. So the issues are primarily convenience and cost. The room EQ of a new receiver may be something you love, like, dislike, or hate, and so it is very hard to say how much that should influence your decision. I personally would not decide based primarily on that, though I do like the room EQ of my Yamaha.
 
G

Gratefulvol

Audiophyte
I am currently using a PS3 for my Blu Ray duties, but was planning on moving it to another room if I get the Oppo. I agree that the Denon would be the cheaper option than the Denon currently, but I guess I wonder if the benefits of the Oppo are worth more than the new receiver. Decisions.....

BTW, thanks for the input on the Yamaha!
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top