skizzerflake

skizzerflake

Audioholic Field Marshall
I have to preface this by saying that I'm not a big fan of Tarentino. I've seem most of his movies to keep my qualifications as a film fan, but I don't see what makes them likable. My least unfavorite one was Inglorious Bastards, and Django seems to be carrying on the trend to righteous revenge movies. This one moves from IB's ironic and fantasized take on the Holocaust to revenge against plantation slavery. Yes, as you would expect, the film is meticulously directed, acted and produced but I was somewhat put off by scenes with the digital equivalent of painted backdrops and one scene where there are digitally rendered fires on the ground and a character obviously steps in a fire without reacting. I don't think those bloopers were intended to be ironic.

That was small, however, compared to the extreme, excessive violence. It was violent even by Tarentino standards. They must have kept a trainload of blood squibs on hand for some scenes. Torture, whipping, cracking bones, brandings, castration, exploding flesh, flying bodies and splattering brains all abound. The plot builds to its obvious climax, which....surprise....is more extreme violence. The characters are mainly comic book stereotypes so killing them by the dozens doesn't really mean much, by really, do we need this?
 
96cobra10101

96cobra10101

Senior Audioholic
Sounds like a normal QT film. I'll wait for video since Inglorious Bastards didn't do for me. I keep expecting another Pulp Fiction, but I think those days are gone. Liked your review by the way.
 
C

chris6878

Audioholic
If u like violence and revenge flicks....then thisnmovie is great. If u don't.......then do not spend your money to watch
 
N

Nestor

Senior Audioholic
This was a good movie, with all of the requisite Tarantino features, including his signature impossibly-tense situations. The dinner scenes in "Candy-land" were some of his finest examples.

The movie was littered was some of his usual suspects, and even some oddly-chosen but well-suited actors for various bit parts. (Tom Wopat?)

I didn't find Django any more violent than his previous films; however, I think the "squirm-factor" is heightened by the cruelty of the times. DiCaprio's character is both uncomfortably civil and savage, and Sam Jackson is both sycophantic and socio-pathic.

To me, the movie's biggest failing was the ending. Maybe Tarantino was paying homage to B-Westerns, found it a little overwrought. When Django rode off with the bag of explosives, they could have run the credits and cued the cool spaghetti western music, and the movie would have had the perfect ending. You KNOW he's going to succeed, so why bother?
 
afterlife2

afterlife2

Audioholic Warlord
Just got the BD on Ebay. I heard great things about it, so why not?!:D
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
I thought Inglorious Basterds was excellent, but still sort of standard Tarantino fare. Freaking great acting, ridiculous situations, and his characteristic humor that you either enjoy or don't. I happen to like it, but I don't consider his films "masterpieces", though they do entertain. I could do without some of the violence. Got enough in Reservoir Dogs already, so while I "get" it, I don't find that it always adds anything beneficial to all of his films. I will get around to Django at some point.
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top