hmmmm
The problems he cites could be real. It would be hard for any of us to know since we all are subjected to the referenced influences every day for most of the day. I know that I feel a lot better when I go for a walk in the woods.
However, you'd sure expect that if these thoughts are valid, SOMEBODY else would have caught on and we would have heard of it by now. There is very little truly original thought. If this guy is right, I'd sure like a second opinion, and a third, and a fourth. Further, it's a wide chasm between identifying an issue and selling some potion to cure it. I ain't sending him any dough.
He enlists the opinions of recording engineers who he claims have understood the problems of digital music for 25 years. He infers these engineers share his views on Life Energy, where they probably were saying "yeah, it doesn't sound as good".
While the message doesn't pass the cynic's "believability" test, it is entirely possible that the author truly believes the problem to exist and has spent time and effort solve it, thus the product. He may truly believe that the problem is real, his product addresses the concern, and may be doing it for free. We live in a doubter's age, but not Everyone is trying to rip you off.
I can listen to my all-digital system for hours without fatigue although I've sure heard digital sound bad. It does have issues to overcome through system-building. I'm not confident that self-awareness and identity are among the problems of digital sound though.