Common compression ratios for HD and SD used by the industry

GlocksRock

GlocksRock

Audioholic Spartan
so when will there be enough bandwidth so that they don't need to use much, if any compression at all?
 
W

westcott

Audioholic General
GlocksRock said:
so when will there be enough bandwidth so that they don't need to use much, if any compression at all?
GlocksRock,

It is ALL about greed. The content providers get paid for how many stations they can provide, not the quality of the video or audio.

If they got rid of all the paid programming and the BS stations, there would be plenty of bandwidth to do it right.
 
GlocksRock

GlocksRock

Audioholic Spartan
That's all well and good, but why can't they just keep the current channel lineup, and just use less compression. Is the extra bandwidth just too expensive, or will the current infrastructure not support it?
 
W

westcott

Audioholic General
GlocksRock said:
That's all well and good, but why can't they just keep the current channel lineup, and just use less compression. Is the extra bandwidth just too expensive, or will the current infrastructure not support it?
The best analogy I can give you GR is that content is like a pizza. You can slice it as many ways and as many times as you want but you still only have one pizza.

They can sell it by the slice for a lot more than if they gave you the whole pizza.
 
W

westcott

Audioholic General
Clint DeBoer said:
The two they typically utilize are called "barely acceptable" and "really bad".
"barely acceptable" = for those who can actually tell a difference in quality.:mad:

"really bad" = for those who would not know the difference.:confused:
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top