<font color='#000000'>I bought the Sapphire ST2 fronts, Sapphire center and surrounds last night. sapphireaudio.com
The cost of the five speakers at $1,700 was way over my original budget. I hope that I don't experience "buyers remorse".
I was surprised to discover that the center channel speaker is very deep. When I saw the center speaker at Tweeter it was sandwiched between two speakers with larger fronts (taller and wider). The small front gave it the appearance of being lower in quality and I was concerned that Sapphire had skimped on its design and materials. However, upon opening the impossibly large box, my build quality concerns were allayed when I discovered that it is actually deep and heavy. The center also has a handy adjustable strut that enables the speaker to be tilted down toward the listener when placed on top of my Mitsubishi projection television.
My second trial of the Boston Acoustics VR950s and the Sapphire ST2s revealed the richer full range sound of the Sapphires. The Boston VR950s were an incredibly good speaker, with nice rich tones, but ultimately I wanted front speakers that could produce lower frequencies (30hz – 20khz) for home theater listening. The 10” side-firing woofer produces some nice rich bass.
I connected the front ST2s to my Onkyo receiver last night and listened to a classical and a jazz CD. The violin music on the classical CD was incredible, but the older recording of the jazz CD was less impressive. It is interesting to have speakers that reveal the lower quality of some CD recordings. Tonight, I will connect the center-speaker and wall mount the surrounds. It will be most interesting to try a DVD movie and a DVD audio. I was originally going to spend $300 on a pair of the Sapphire bookshelf speakers, but ultimately splurged on the Sapphire specialty “dipolar radiation” surrounds at $500. The cabinet on the surrounds is shallower and wider, which will look less obtrusive when mounted on the wall.
The ST2 fronts, being very tall (44”), narrow (6”), deep (15.2”) and heavy (54.1 lbs) were extremely awkward to unpack. But that attractive and quality design was one of the contributing factors to my decision.
My thanks to everyone who enjoyed reading or responding to my posts in the last few days. It is nice to have a community of people who enjoy discussing A/V equipment, as virtually everyone I know has virtually no interest in a subject that brings me great pleasure.</font>