B

BobSD

Audioholic
Any input on this Amp, called the BK Butler, TDB2250 Highbred tube Amp, I want to use my receiver as a pre-amp with the BK Butler for two channel. Decided to buy The "Spire", MartinLogans, and Depth i for sub, they are four ohm speakers that will give me 400X2 ohms. Think this is a good setup??
 
bandphan

bandphan

Banned
Why that amp? Have you considered a class d ice amp mono block or stereo? That is the same amp that is coupled with the bass driver. The only reason I ask is you can get alot more bang for that buck, if you want it.
If its a certain "sound" your looking for you can add an outboard dsp to the mix. Did you contact ML on suggestions of amp types/power?

SIDE NOTE: Very nice speaker system btw.

what size/shape is your room

http://www.d-sonic.net/
 
B

BobSD

Audioholic
Thanks for your reply. I know I am getting into the high price range and I should be more knowlegeable, but I am using my ears and trust that the sales person knows what they are doing. I am getting a great deal on the Spire, was going to get the Summit, but they are temp discontinued, they are being up graded with their cross-over. I heard tube amps are best for music especially sterio, but not sure about this highbred part. Just trying to keep it as simple as I can, but get that sound I am looking for. The room is 22x26ft, with cathedral ceiling. I guess I am putting alot of trust in the person I am making the purshase from. Just wondering if you have any thing neg about the Butler Amp, trying to buy everything from the same source, since they will be helping set it up.
 
bandphan

bandphan

Banned
No negative, imo you might be overpaying due to the "tube" hybrid part. You dealer might have other power options that could represent more value. The Dsonic magnum 500, would run 1000w@ 4 ohm at 999 each block, would be a serious unit for the Spire.The room size would is generous, what are the wall made of. Also are they going to included into the ht? If so what center? That would also make a good condideration for mono blocks. I like the tube colored sound and if you want some good opionons on them, PM Hifihoney, or TLS guy as HH has a great tube collection and TLS have a great working knowledge of build.
Good Luck and enjoy

scott
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
Any input on this Amp, called the BK Butler, TDB2250 Highbred tube Amp, I want to use my receiver as a pre-amp with the BK Butler for two channel. Decided to buy The "Spire", MartinLogans, and Depth i for sub, they are four ohm speakers that will give me 400X2 ohms. Think this is a good setup??
I have just been on the BK Butler web site. The info is totally dishonest, misleading and bogus.

Basically they trying to say they are absolute geniuses because they can use a single "ended" triode tube and get 0.1% THD.

BOGUS! BOGUS!

A single ended tube amp means an amp using a single triode as the output device. The distortion if these amps is at least 2% and they only can deliver two to four watts of power at the most.

Their amps in NO WAY are single ended triode amps, but do have a single triode in each channel.

What these clowns are doing is putting one triode tube stage of voltage amplification in each channel and congratulating themselves on getting 0.1% THD! Their output stages are entirely solid state.

Now Harold J. Leak achieved 20 watts of tube amplification, no solid state devices then, and achieved 0.1% THD in 1948, setting a new benchmark!

Putting one tube in each channel has no merit whatever. It is just a potential source of noise and failure. Solid state devices have much better signal to noise specs.

If you want to waste money on this sort of nonsense, it is your dime.

This is the sort of lunacy that needs swatting at every opportunity. It is hubris like this that has basically ruined the hobby of audio. I will hold it against you if you give them one dime of your hard earned money.
 
B

BobSD

Audioholic
TSLGuy, Wow thats some pretty serious Stuff! I do not have the knowlege you have so put alot of faith in the sales person but then I felt it would not hurt to here other opinions. Another guy was trying to sell me a Cary Audio CAD200 it also has a tube setup. What I am trying to do is power Martin Logan electrostatic speakers. They all tell me if I am into Music, not surround, go two channel amp, pre-amp. I am trying to save money and use my Integra or Denon as a pre-amp and buy a good two channel amp that will deliver 250 - 300 watts per- chan @ 4 ohms. Are you actually saying this Buttller amp is a $3,000 piece of junk? It would take away from a good sounding pair of speakers like the Martin Logan?? So what Amps do you recommend? Boy I am back to square one, because I respect your opinion, and I am not yet locked into the Amp deal, but have purchased the speakers. Please help and advise.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
TSLGuy, Wow thats some pretty serious Stuff! I do not have the knowlege you have so put alot of faith in the sales person but then I felt it would not hurt to here other opinions. Another guy was trying to sell me a Cary Audio CAD200 it also has a tube setup. What I am trying to do is power Martin Logan electrostatic speakers. They all tell me if I am into Music, not surround, go two channel amp, pre-amp. I am trying to save money and use my Integra or Denon as a pre-amp and buy a good two channel amp that will deliver 250 - 300 watts per- chan @ 4 ohms. Are you actually saying this Buttller amp is a $3,000 piece of junk? It would take away from a good sounding pair of speakers like the Martin Logan?? So what Amps do you recommend? Boy I am back to square one, because I respect your opinion, and I am not yet locked into the Amp deal, but have purchased the speakers. Please help and advise.
OK. I have a definite recommendation. Without a doubt the Quad 909 is the amp you are looking for. Quad stands for Quality Unit Audio Domestic.

Quad was founded in 1936 by the late Peter Walker OBE.

Just before the end of WWII he moved to Huntingdon Cambridgeshire. In the post war years he developed tube amps of unrivaled performance and quality.

In 1957 he introduced the the world's first full range electrostatic loudspeaker. what has now come to be known as the Quad 57. In 1963 he started R & D on the famous Quad 63 Electrostatic loudspeaker. It was 16 years in genesis. Along the way he designed the worlds first transistor amp unconditionally stable into all loads. The Quad 303. These amps are still highly sought after 40 years on. I have one of his originals, and I have never been inside the case!

Then he had another of his strokes of pure genius, the Class C feed forward amplifier. What Peter called his current dumping amplifier. There first was the 405 followed by the 405 2 and the 606 finally his last version the 909.

After retiring due to ill health and his subsequent death, Quad was eventually acquired by the current owners International Audio group.

Now the genius of Peter's current dumping amps, is that apart from being unconditionally stable into all loads, is that they maintain performance year after year. The components can age and drift in value within wide margins and the performance of the amp is unaffected. The performance of the amp is set by the very high quality class A amp. This provides the error correction to the dumper transistors. There is no crossover distortion. They are superb unfussy amplifiers that you just use and forget.

In your situation the choice of one of Peter's current dumping amps is particularly apt, as Peter Walker was renowned for his electrostatic loudspeakers. Electrostatics present a highly reactive load to an amp, which embarrasses many. However the 909 handles this type of load with ease. It will deliver 250 watts per channel into four ohms.

http://www.quad-hifi.co.uk/model.php?sector_id=2&range_id=3&model_id=12

Galen Carol Audio offer it at an excellent price. MRSP is now $1840 and they are $500 under that.

http://www.gcaudio.com/cgi-bin/store/showProduct.cgi?id=93

I know of no better amp at any price and can recommend this amp with unreserved confidence. I own two of them and eight 405 2s

This Class C feed forward design was one of many of Peter Walker's patents. This paten is now held by IAG. The 909 is the only Class C feed forward current dumping amplifier available.

This is a good read.

http://www.audioxpress.com/bksprods/products/bkia1.htm

And yes, I'm saying that BK Butler amp, is founded on BS, and the advertising
puffery is loony and designed to appeal to those with more money than sense and no technical background. Tube amps belong in museums not heir domestic audio systems.

IAG have resurrected Peter's justly famous Quad II tube amp. While Peter was alive and owned the company, he steadfastly refused to reintroduce that amp. He just would have no truck with the loony set, and constantly spared with them. He predicted they would do immense harm to the development of audio, which indeed they have.
 
B

BobSD

Audioholic
Now I know why you have reached the rank of Field Marshall! I like everything I read about the 909, including the compact size, and completely sealed. I will be calling the guy in Denver, Col. and tell him I want to change the Amp to the 909 QUAD, and if he insist the Buttler is what I MUST have then I will cancel the whole package. I did tell him in the beginning that I did not like the size of the Butler and would have to redo my StudioTec shelfs, but more inportant did not like the idea to have to replace tube every so many miles(hours). Eventually will add the 99 preAmp. but my Integra is only 3 months old. On a side note thanks to this sight I found out that Integra & Onkyo, do have a popping problem that can harm your speakers and they sent me CD soft ware to prevent this from happening. The problem is only when using in the HD-DVD mode, and I do not have HD-DVD player right Now.Thank you Thank You!!!!!
 
Adam

Adam

Audioholic Jedi
Now I know why you have reached the rank of Field Marshall!
Bob, just to clarify - the titles underneath our names are based solely on number of posts. However, TLS Guy is extremely helpful (I highly enjoy his posts, especially on tube equipment) - and that's reflected in the number of green "chicklets" on the right-hand side of his title bar.
 
sleepysurf

sleepysurf

Junior Audioholic
Congrats on the Spires, sounds like ML has another winner with that design. I have ML Summits, and at one point tried a Butler 2250 amp with them. The tubes in the Butler are more than just hype, and *do* impart a bit of "tube" sound (some might call it distortion) yielding a more mellow midrange and treble, but which I found lacking in bass with the Summits. BTW, the tubes in the Butler are soldered to the power boards, and are not meant (nor do they ever require) replacement. Not satisfied with the Summit/Butler synergy, I eventually settled on a Belles 350A Reference SS amp, which offers high current output (64 amps peak), and 500 W into 4 ohms (ML speakers can dip below 1 ohm in the treble regions!). The Belles drives the ML stat panels beautifully, with power to spare. There are NUMEROUS amps (both SS and tube) that ML owners have used with success, but I've never heard of anybody using the Quad amp. Of note, Roger Sanders (Sanders Sound Systems, formerly Innersound) offers a SS amp that is likewise designed specifically for electrostatic speakers, and most who've paired it with ML's have been very pleased. Check out the ML Owners Club for lots of amp discussion threads.

As for pre-amps, I have also experimented with various approaches, including...
-Benchmark DAC-1 direct to amp: extremely clean crisp detailed sound, but not the most "musical"
-Channel Island Audio VPC-3 passive pre/switch: a great "minimalist" solution, and pretty close to the Benchmark DAC in transparency and detail, but offering no additional advantages since it likewise lacks a remote
-Denon 3808CI as a Pre- both with, and without invoking the Audyssey MultEQ correction: gives more expensive components a run for their money because of it's superb room correction capability, which really smoothed out the bass nodes of my room, fairly "musical" too, IMHO
-Modwright SWL 9.0 Signature Edition (tube pre): still my ultimate favorite, as the overall cleanest sounding AND musical linestage, and best of all, features a Home Theater Bypass, allowing me to feed the Denon Pre output (with or without Audyssey) to my Belles amp for Home Theater playback.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
Congrats on the Spires, sounds like ML has another winner with that design. I have ML Summits, and at one point tried a Butler 2250 amp with them. The tubes in the Butler are more than just hype, and *do* impart a bit of "tube" sound (some might call it distortion) yielding a more mellow midrange and treble, but which I found lacking in bass with the Summits. BTW, the tubes in the Butler are soldered to the power boards, and are not meant (nor do they ever require) replacement. Not satisfied with the Summit/Butler synergy, I eventually settled on a Belles 350A Reference SS amp, which offers high current output (64 amps peak), and 500 W into 4 ohms (ML speakers can dip below 1 ohm in the treble regions!). The Belles drives the ML stat panels beautifully, with power to spare. There are NUMEROUS amps (both SS and tube) that ML owners have used with success, but I've never heard of anybody using the Quad amp. Of note, Roger Sanders (Sanders Sound Systems, formerly Innersound) offers a SS amp that is likewise designed specifically for electrostatic speakers, and most who've paired it with ML's have been very pleased. Check out the ML Owners Club for lots of amp discussion threads.

As for pre-amps, I have also experimented with various approaches, including...
-Benchmark DAC-1 direct to amp: extremely clean crisp detailed sound, but not the most "musical"
-Channel Island Audio VPC-3 passive pre/switch: a great "minimalist" solution, and pretty close to the Benchmark DAC in transparency and detail, but offering no additional advantages since it likewise lacks a remote
-Denon 3808CI as a Pre- both with, and without invoking the Audyssey MultEQ correction: gives more expensive components a run for their money because of it's superb room correction capability, which really smoothed out the bass nodes of my room, fairly "musical" too, IMHO
-Modwright SWL 9.0 Signature Edition (tube pre): still my ultimate favorite, as the overall cleanest sounding AND musical linestage, and best of all, features a Home Theater Bypass, allowing me to feed the Denon Pre output (with or without Audyssey) to my Belles amp for Home Theater playback.
Peter Walker was a modest man and one of Audio's greatest figures. He produced durable products of unparalleled performance at reasonably cost. He made no bogus claims.

If an amp has a smooth frequency response throughout the audio range, low distortion, especially absence of crossover distortion, can deliver current quickly to complex loads, both inductive and capacitative, reproduce a nice clean square wave without ringing, it will sound fine. The Quad 909 does all that superbly, without fuss and with high reliability year after year after year.

All this talk of amp having liquid mid range, fast tight bass, transparent highs, and every other virtue or perceived ill is pure BS, puffery and hubris.

A good amp can be discerned from measurement and measurement alone. I know that is heresy to the loony set, but it's true.

Amps no longer need tubes. If speakers require these odd aberrations, then there are cheaper, better and more sensible ways of achieving it.

If good speakers are driven by good amps that measure well and fulfill the above criteria, they won't care which one is driving them.

All this nonsense has wasted effort and resources. We would be a lot further ahead without it.

As I have said before, all this is driven by the technically ignorant, who can come to believe just about any lunacy.

A Quad 909 will drive the OP's MLs superbly, now and for many, many years to come, without degradation of performance.
 
sleepysurf

sleepysurf

Junior Audioholic
The Quad 909 may very well be a great amp, but it only puts out max 11 A current. Can you demo one on a trial basis? BTW, another "great value" high current output amp is the Sunfire. It is a switching design, very similar to the new crop of Class D amps, and runs extremely cool. Sunfires work great with ML's, but I think they only offer multi-channel designs now.

Also, if you've never run electrostatic speakers before, be forewarned that they take a lot more time to properly set up, and the sweet spot will be narrower than with dynamic speakers. Room acoustics (as with all speakers) are particularly important with ML's.

If you want an earful of advice, post your query at the ML Owners Club...
http://www.martinloganowners.com/forum/
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
The Quad 909 may very well be a great amp, but it only puts out max 11 A current.

Well that's a lot of power. 11 amps squared into a four ohm resistance is 484 watts. But actually it is conservatively rated to deliver 250 watts continuous power reliably into four ohms. They drive electrostatics perfectly, which make a lot of lesser amps ring.

You don't need to audition a well made amp, but a good dealer will let you try one. Peter's unique design garnered him a huge number of design awards and recognition, and well it should. He refused to cow tow to the loony set, in fact swatted them at every opportunity.
 
B

BobSD

Audioholic
Well TLSGuy, I was going to forget about the Butler, but after reading this review I definitely must hear it, since I have this ringing in the ear problem inherited from my military career. Maybe once you could be off base with this Butler Amp, since you have never listened to it in person. This is the site, www.sixmoons.com/audioreviews/butler/2250_html I do play my volume level lower then I would like to as not to trigger my tinnitius. I appreciate all the work you have done checking out Butler, but I will give all my opinion once I test it out. Thanks again to all that have offered there opinions!!!
 
B

BobSD

Audioholic
This will get to the review I am referring to: 6moons audio reviews audio TDB2250 find in google if your interested.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
TLSGUY I need your help even though this amp is not at the same level but would appreciate your more than knowledgeable oppinion on the EMOTIVA http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44990
The Emotiva amps seem to have a good reputation and give good value for money. They make no nonsensical claims. They don't insert tubes for spurious reasons, and solder them directly to PCB boards! You almost certainly will have a better and longer lasting amp than that bogus Butler contraption. All tubes are destroying themselves slowly but surely every minute they are switched on. I have absolutely no time for pseudo science and BS.
 
TheFactor

TheFactor

Audioholic Field Marshall
The Emotiva amps seem to have a good reputation and give good value for money. They make no nonsensical claims. They don't insert tubes for spurious reasons, and solder them directly to PCB boards! You almost certainly will have a better and longer lasting amp than that bogus Butler contraption. All tubes are destroying themselves slowly but surely every minute they are switched on. I have absolutely no time for pseudo science and BS.
Thankyou I appreciate and respect your oppinion:)
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top