<font color='#000000'>Even reputable companies don't always resist a little nip of snake oil in the face of "market realities", such as customer demand (hey, if it takes two sets of binding posts to get "high end" cred, what the hey?) or strategic parterships with a wire vendor, and so on.
First of all, nice to be back. I took a little hiatus from A/V until I realized just how much I enjoy movies and music through a good A/V system.
I think Rip hit the nail on the head there. My current fav. speaker company, Paradgim, has this to say.
"Bi-wiring/bi-amping can improve clarity, detail and bass response. And since bi-wiring only requires another set of speaker cables, this can be a very inexpensive option to consider."
http://www.paradigm.com/Support/TechFAQ/TechFAQ.html#Question12
I haven't experienced bi-wiring for myself yet, which is why I'm here. Interestingly enough, I contacted Paradigm and asked them what cables they use to test their speakers or evaluate their performance and how they connect them. They wouldn't say, simply referring me to the dealer for a recommendation. I though if they were in cahoots with a wire company, they'd be eager to drop a name.
I'm still curious as to why many speaker and amplifier manufacturers recommend biwiring in particular. You'd think bi-amping would be in the amp. makers best interests, but they insist on bi-wiring, and I mean almost all of them. What do they know we don't? Some amp. makers (Blue Circle comes to mind) even offer two sets of binding posts for each channel for "shot gun" biwiring.
Another one of life's great mysteries.