Best Speaker You Have Owned.

Pyrrho

Pyrrho

Audioholic Ninja
A thread about the worst speakers people have owned has inspired this thread. What is the best speaker you have ever owned?

I'll go first. The best speaker I have ever owned is the Apogee Stage speaker. They seem almost magical in their ability to reproduce sounds naturally. When I put on a small jazz ensemble, it almost sounds as if they are in my room with me. It is almost as if I have raised Ella Fitzgerald from the dead, and she is in my living room.

But, these speakers are 3 ohms, take considerable space, and are a bother to set up properly. If I listened just to things like Jimi Hendrix (who I like), they would not be worth the bother.

The best easy to live with speaker that I have owned is the Aurum Cantus Leisure 2SE (original U.S. version). They are small, attractive, normal in their placement requirements, an easy 8 ohms and of normal sensitivity, so pretty much any amplifier will work with them, and can be conveniently used for surround systems. The treble is as magical as the Apogee Stage, though the carbon fibor blend woofer, though good, is not as good as the ribbon/planar drivers in the Stage, so the midrange and bass are not as good.
 
its phillip

its phillip

Audioholic Ninja
So far it's the Energy RC-50s I just got. I haven't owned that many speakers :D
 
E

enrique

Full Audioholic
The best is what i have now.Started with def tech pro cinema 100's,then to B&W 603s3's upfront.Then the system audio sa1750's full setup.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
The best is what i have now.Started with def tech pro cinema 100's,then to B&W 603s3's upfront.Then the system audio sa1750's full setup.
The SA1750’s listening-window response (a five-point average of axial and +/-15 degree horizontal and vertical responses) measures +1.88/-3.44 dB from 200 Hz to 10 kHz. The -3dB point is at 64Hz, and the -6dB point is at 57Hz. Impedance reaches a minimum of 3.88 ohms at 241 Hz and a phase angle of -43.57 degrees at 126 Hz.

http://www.hometheater.com/content/system-audio-sa1750-speaker-system-ht-labs-measures

Are you going to buy the SA subwoofer?
 
Last edited:
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
For comparison to the SA speakers' FR, here is the B&W 803D:

The 803D's listening-window response (a five-point average of axial and +/–15-degree horizontal and vertical responses) measures +1.90/–3.68 decibels from 200 hertz to 10 kilohertz. The –3dB point is at 46 Hz, and the –6dB point is at 37 Hz. Impedance reaches a minimum of 3.65 ohms at 99 Hz and a phase angle of –56.23 degrees at 50 Hz.

http://www.hometheater.com/content/bw-803d-speaker-system-ht-labs-measures
 
Last edited:
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Should we change the name of the thread to "Best we have ever HEARD" ?:D

Because the speakers we have NOW are apparently the best speakers we OWN. Otherwise, why would we OWN them?:D
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
We need to start a poll that asks which speakers would you choose?

1) speakers that just sound the best to your ears?

or

2) speakers that have a flat frequency response, and thus are mroe "accurate" and "neutral"?
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
My quest for better speakers ended with the GR A/V-2s I currently own.
 
Pyrrho

Pyrrho

Audioholic Ninja
Should we change the name of the thread to "Best we have ever HEARD" ?:D

Because the speakers we have NOW are apparently the best speakers we OWN. Otherwise, why would we OWN them?:D
Although it will usually be the case that the best that someone has owned will be the current speakers owned, there will be exceptions, as when people have sold equipment because they needed the money, or it was too big or otherwise too much trouble to live with them, or they were damaged or deteriorated with age, and so something else took its place, etc. I am somewhat concerned that if something happens to one of the bass panels of my Apogee Stage speakers, that no replacement will be possible, and I will have to get either another used pair, or go to something else. I purchased my current ones used, and have kept an eye out for more of them from various places online (like eBay), but it is pretty rare to find them in the excellent condition that mine are in. The bass panels look almost like new, with no dings or dents at all. Most of the ones I have seen for sale have quite noticeable visible issues with the bass panels, though whether they affect the sound or not is hard to tell from looking at pictures online.;)

I don't really want a "best we have ever heard" thread, because then we will likely get mostly crazy expensive models and not as much variety, and there will be little regard for value for one's money, which, however, will be an issue for most people when we are dealing with speakers that people have owned.
 
Pyrrho

Pyrrho

Audioholic Ninja
We need to start a poll that asks which speakers would you choose?

1) speakers that just sound the best to your ears?

or

2) speakers that have a flat frequency response, and thus are mroe "accurate" and "neutral"?

The one with a flatter frequency response might have greater amounts of various types of distortion, have a different dispersion pattern, etc., so I would not want to pick solely on flatness of frequency response.

Since not all of the parameters are going to be known in practice, I would pick what sounds best to my ears rather than just go with the one that supposedly has the flattest frequency response (or any other one measurement or specification), particularly when I also remember that my room may very well affect the frequency response, so that it is conceivable that the ones that measured worse would actually give me a flatter response in my particular room placed wherever it is that I place them. Most likely, that will not be the case, but the other characteristics of the speakers matter a great deal anyway, so I am still left with selecting the ones that subjectively sound the best to me.

Still, I do pay attention to measurements of speakers, as it helps avoid speakers with serious problems that way, regardless of whatever other virtues a particular speaker might have.

I would like to see more extensive measurements of different kinds of speakers, and some sort of explanation for the subjective differences between certain kinds of speakers and others. For example, my Apogee Stage speakers subjectively seem like the sound is clearer and less distorted than with most other speakers, as if the hype about the low mass of the drivers and the basically even force applied to them is real, but I don't know really what they are doing as I lack the equipment necessary to measure what they are doing. Everyone else who hears them seems pretty impressed with them, whether they have heard any hype about ribbon drivers or not, so it doesn't seem to be purely a matter of the power of suggestion, but that there is something different about what they are producing compared with many other speakers. But I would be far from surprised if some other speakers in their price range measure better in some respects, even if they sound worse due to some other flaw.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
Fine. Okay then, I think the best speakers I've ever owned was the NHT SuperZero + SW2P (2.1).

I used the speaker-level connection - speaker wire form AVR to the SW2P sub's speaker input, then to the SuperZero bookshelf speakers.

They were really clear, and had excellent resolution/detail compared to most speakers I've auditioned since then, including some speakers costing over $20,000/pr.

They sounded better than the $2K/pr Revel Performa M22 bookshelf speakers.

After I graduated from graduate school, I thought it was time to move on to "High-End" speakers that cost a lot more. I mean come on, I didn't want to own some $90 speakers?:D

So I gave the system to my little brother Tommy. He still owns them.

Since the NHT SuperZero days, the only 2 other speakers that remind me of the great resolution/detail are the Revel Salon 2 and the Linkwitz Orion.
 
Alex2507

Alex2507

Audioholic Slumlord
Infinity Primus 360 ... I was just watching a concert DVD yesterday thinking how nice they sound. I've been inside them adding insulation and silencing the cans for magnetic shielding so I have no clue what an untouched pair sound like anymore but if anything I would like to buy another pair for comparison and for different (more extensive) mods.

It's a matter of affordability. I can't afford anything that sounds better.
 
W

walker17

Enthusiast
JSE Model 2's. Have had them since 1987, have not heard anything better that i can afford! Problem has been finding a decent match center for hom e theater.

JWalker
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
Although it will usually be the case that the best that someone has owned will be the current speakers owned, there will be exceptions, as when people have sold equipment because they needed the money, or it was too big or otherwise too much trouble to live with them, or they were damaged or deteriorated with age, and so something else took its place, etc. I am somewhat concerned that if something happens to one of the bass panels of my Apogee Stage speakers, that no replacement will be possible, and I will have to get either another used pair, or go to something else. I purchased my current ones used, and have kept an eye out for more of them from various places online (like eBay), but it is pretty rare to find them in the excellent condition that mine are in. The bass panels look almost like new, with no dings or dents at all. Most of the ones I have seen for sale have quite noticeable visible issues with the bass panels, though whether they affect the sound or not is hard to tell from looking at pictures online.;)

I don't really want a "best we have ever heard" thread, because then we will likely get mostly crazy expensive models and not as much variety, and there will be little regard for value for one's money, which, however, will be an issue for most people when we are dealing with speakers that people have owned.
Each step was an upgrade for me, but each upgrade was a significant jump in cost as well. I've heard speakers better than mine but I already know that it will cost me quite a bit more than the A/V-2s to move up to what I feel is a justifiable increase in performance. What it comes down to is that I am very pleased with they system the way it sounds now and I have had no real desire to upgrade the speakers for quite a few years now even though I still go and listen to a lot of speakers. These still make me extremely happy, so why mess with a good thing? I don't sit there and think "What speakers will be my next ones?" anymore :) I'd call it a temporary equilibrium, not the end of the road.
 
KEW

KEW

Audioholic Overlord
My current Focal Solo6 Be's are the best speakers I have owned (bass duties are being assigned to a sub - these have 6.5" woofer).
They are as accurate as any speaker I have had the opportunity to hear thus far.

On a subjective note, I have to add that my KLH 6-V's (that is the vinyl clad version of the famous KLH 6's) are the favorite speaker of my life. I paid something ridiculous like $59 for the pair (accolades to KLH for catering to the "bottom feeder" market with the vinyl clad version of an already competitive product). These speakers surpassed anything I had previously experienced and anything I expected to be able to afford on my Jr. High paper route income. While I know they were good, but not great speakers, they were simply amazing speakers at the time and place I encountered them!

Cheers!
 
O

oppman99

Senior Audioholic
My Paradigm S8's are the best I've owned and are likely to keep that title for quite a while. Well, at least until the house is paid for. I've heard better, but the cost compared to the improvement I'd get by changing just isn't worth it (or affordable) to me at this point. The good part is I'm very happy with them and really don't feel anything is significantly lacking. I'd love to have some electrostats though.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
My Paradigm S8's are the best I've owned and are likely to keep that title for quite a while. Well, at least until the house is paid for. I've heard better, but the cost compared to the improvement I'd get by changing just isn't worth it (or affordable) to me at this point. The good part is I'm very happy with them and really don't feel anything is significantly lacking. I'd love to have some electrostats though.
What was better, and how much better in your opinion?
 
S

swspiers

Audioholic
My beloved Ohm F's are the best I have ever heard, or owned.

But alas!, I must let go of them. They are beyond my means or ability to restore to their proper condition :(
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top