gene said:
Um, not quite! In fact, most PC based audio analyzers are serverly limited b/c of noise, distortion and resolution. Its fine to do spot check measurements for the most part, but doesn't cut the mustard for developing new hardware or doing precise measurements. Its funny when I see some web publications measuring amp distortion and noise floor with a $5 soundcard and PC software as you put it, when at best they are usually measuring the limits of their test setup.
Well, I don't know about a '$5' soundcard for electronics benchmarking.... but a $200 sound card, such as E-MU 1212M, has distortion residuals into the ten-thousandths of a percent, and signal:noise ratio exceeding -115dB. The software solutions are perfectly viable given competant use/application. The only limitation is bandwidth, which is practically limited to 192kHz sample rate. For high frequency oscillation analysis/stability of a circuit during development, it should be apparent to a designer that sufficient equipment should still be used to analyse this particular detail[o-scope]. If the equipment being measured is being masked by the residuals of an impeccable card such as the E-MU 1212M, then it is indeed incredible hardware being tested, and of such small residuals that to gather actual absolute measurements under this residual threshold is only of academic interest.
For acoustical testing, a $60 Creative card is more than sufficient for accurate testing/analysis when combined with a calibrated microphone and powerful software such as LSPLAB, LEAP, ETF, etc.. A stand alone portable meter will not have the extensive analysis ability of a computer paired with such software.
-Chris