ATI AT6000 Signature Amplifier Review

gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
ATI is a well-known amplifier manufacturer that also builds amplifiers for Lexicon, Outlaw, SAE, and most recently Monoprice. Their Signature Series amplifiers are their top-of-the line reference offering. It is a fully balanced class A/B design using two toroidal transformers and independent secondary windings to provide separate power supplies for each channel. With configurations from 2 to 7 channels the ATI AT6000 series amplifier performance is as massive as its dimensions and weight; and yet, completely silent. Their performance matches and exceeds many mono-blocks while versatile enough to support bi-amplified and multi-channel audiophile systems.

ATI-revel.jpg


Read: ATI AT6000 Signature Amplifier Review
 
Mikado463

Mikado463

Audioholic Spartan
Gene, nice write up !

It's interesting that you prefer to bi-amp your Revels, I've monoblocked mine (PASS X260.8's) to great satisfaction as well.
 
Irvrobinson

Irvrobinson

Audioholic Spartan
I'm not getting it. What is the value of this review? I like RichB, I think he's an engaging writer, and I like ATI amps and Revel Salon2 speakers, but this review is entirely opinion on an amplifier. I would have really liked to see measurements of this amp, but all I see is opinion. I look forward to AH measurements, so I'm disappointed that they weren't performed.
 
gene

gene

Audioholics Master Chief
Administrator
I'm not getting it. What is the value of this review? I like RichB, I think he's an engaging writer, and I like ATI amps and Revel Salon2 speakers, but this review is entirely opinion on an amplifier. I would have really liked to see measurements of this amp, but all I see is opinion. I look forward to AH measurements, so I'm disappointed that they weren't performed.
Yea I would love to measure it if I had the time. So take my Monolith-7 measurements and just imagine this amp would measure even better since it's made by the same company but with higher caliber parts usage.
 
RichB

RichB

Audioholic Field Marshall
I'm not getting it. What is the value of this review? I like RichB, I think he's an engaging writer, and I like ATI amps and Revel Salon2 speakers, but this review is entirely opinion on an amplifier. I would have really liked to see measurements of this amp, but all I see is opinion. I look forward to AH measurements, so I'm disappointed that they weren't performed.
I get that but I'd like to think there was some value, even if only entertainment, considering the effort :)

- Rich
 
Irvrobinson

Irvrobinson

Audioholic Spartan
Yea I would love to measure it if I had the time. So take my Monolith-7 measurements and just imagine this amp would measure even better since it's made by the same company but with higher caliber parts usage.
Got it, but ATI makes some claims about circuitry improvements over the AT3000 series, so I was curious if they amounted to anything. (I doubt it, actually, hence my curiosity.)
 
Irvrobinson

Irvrobinson

Audioholic Spartan
I get that but I'd like to think there was some value, even if only entertainment, considering the effort :)

- Rich
Oh sure, I was entertained by reading the article, especially the part where you claim there are obvious differences with bi-amping. I run my Salon2s bi-amped, because Alex dared me try it and I'm too lazy to undo it, but I can't hear a difference.
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
I get that but I'd like to think there was some value, even if only entertainment, considering the effort :)

- Rich
The moment I saw the pic I knew it was your system! :D

Bottom line, whether it is single-amp or bi-amp, no matter how you choose, that Revel Salon/ ATI Reference system is going to sound good. :D
 
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
The one's with the two 10" woofers there like 10 g's each. Still can't believe it cost that much to build them. They should come with a life time warranty.
Well, then it’s time you start a new thread called “Legacy Audio Owner’s Thread” ! ;)
 
RichB

RichB

Audioholic Field Marshall
Oh sure, I was entertained by reading the article, especially the part where you claim there are obvious differences with bi-amping. I run my Salon2s bi-amped, because Alex dared me try it and I'm too lazy to undo it, but I can't hear a difference.
That's interesting. In the past, I have tried bi-amping and found little or no difference. I actually think it sounded worse when using the Marantz AV8801 internal bi-amped setting.

The configuration may be important. I use Y-Connectors (BJC) and stacking banana plugs to make the switch between single-amped and bi-amped (in <30 seconds) and I did so yesterday. I do this periodically as a sanity check. In this case, I chose Cassandra Wilson's "Another Country". Once again, the vocals are clearer and bass is better defined. It is really is quite remarkable. If you come to the Boston area, I'd love to demonstrate.

Useful links:
Cassandra Wilson's "Another Country":
http://www.hdtracks.com/another-country?___store=default&nosto=nosto-page-search1

Locking/Stacking Banana plugs:
https://www.parts-express.com/angled-locking-and-stacking-banana-plug-with-dual-set-screws-poly-carbonate-shell-and-insu--091-3608

My configuration is:
  • Oppo UDP-205 USB DAC (no processing occurs in the Oppo)
  • XMC-1 Balanced inputs in Reference Stereo mode (XMC-1 provides volume control only)
  • Y-Connecters split the signal (no DSP processing involved)
  • Stackable Banana plugs allow switching between single in <30 seconds and SBT
It probably does not matter, but the signal chain is fully balanced.

I don't believe that bi-amping should be put in the same class as other "tweaks".
Some seem to be against because the passive crossovers are still in place.
Yet, logically, there are the following differences between single and (passive) bi-amped speakers are apparent:
  • Crossovers are not perfect, they interact. Revel places them on 4 separate boards to avoid Electromagnetic interaction. It seems logical that actually disconnecting them could yield positive results by fully eliminating interaction. I have seen amplifiers exhibit IMD when 60 and 7kHz signals are played together. It would not be surprising to find interactions within a passive network.
  • The amplifiers experience different loads. I'd love to see impedance and phase measurements performance on speakers like the Salons2 with the straps disconnected. If there is a change, it could account for volume differences at the same voltage.
This is an interesting post on AVS (that I believe is attributed to Kevin Voecks):

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/89-speakers/710918-revel-owners-thread-267.html#post40821322

I too, have heard such effects from passive bi-amping. If the speaker is competently designed, you would never want to insert active crossovers, except for a rare case in which the transfer function required to properly “cross-over” the speaker is published and properly implemented. Otherwise, passive bi-amping can offer sonic improvements. One reason is likely that the impedance outside the pass-band rises dramatically—thus resulting in the amp not being significantly utilized outside the intended frequency range. So for example, an amp dedicated to the high-frequency section of a speaker (whether that is a tweeter alone, or perhaps a tweeter and midrange), will not have significant current draw at low frequencies, resulting in lower distortion.

I believe these comments are referring to amplifier distortion but I believe there is a case that there is less distortion introduced by the crossovers. This is not something I would expect a speaker designer to emphasize ;)
It has been stated that speaker manufactures include bi-amping to sell more amps. I think it is the opposite. Mark Levinson is quite happy to sell a customer two $15K mono-blocks to go with the Salon2's. What I am expressing does not support this strategy.

As far as measurements, I have measured the voltage at the upper and lower halves and found a little difference.
ATI_Parasound_Voltage_at_Frequency.jpg


Still, there is some difference and it is fairly consistent with both the AT6000 and Parasound A21 amps.

I have a few calibrated mic's and REW. Would it be helpful to do some in-room (perhaps near-field) measurements?

I do recommend, trying bi-amping using a single speaker, Y-Connector and
stacking banana plugs. All processing should be turned off (Pure Direct or equivalent). This is a very low cost experiment and can be tried in a SBT.

- Rich
 
RichB

RichB

Audioholic Field Marshall
Got it, but ATI makes some claims about circuitry improvements over the AT3000 series, so I was curious if they amounted to anything. (I doubt it, actually, hence my curiosity.)
This is a two part Widescreen Review has some interesting technical information about the AT6000 design:

http://ati-amp.com/WSR 185 Kessler Interview Part 1.pdf
http://ati-amp.com/WSR 186 Kessler Interview Part 2.pdf

The AT3000 were essentially two separate amplifiers that were bridged.
The AT6000 use a single input stage, current feedback, DC Servo's, and complementary balanced output stages, so I presume that means no longer bridged.

Here is the page from the 202 interview dealing specifically with the AT6000 improvements (starts at the red arrow).

AT6007Section.jpg


This is a technical achievement but will it sound better than an AT3000.. It measures better, especially in the first watt. You can google and find those measurements.

- Rich
 
Irvrobinson

Irvrobinson

Audioholic Spartan
I have a few calibrated mic's and REW. Would it be helpful to do some in-room (perhaps near-field) measurements?

I do recommend, trying bi-amping using a single speaker, Y-Connector and
stacking banana plugs. All processing should be turned off (Pure Direct or equivalent). This is a very low cost experiment and can be tried in a SBT.

- Rich
I have heard an improvement from bi-amping in my own system, but just once. It was with the original Legacy Focus speakers I was using at the time. A really complicated system, with three 12" woofers that, from measurements a friend did, appeared to be 8 ohm Eminence drivers wired in parallel, a pair of Kevlar-coned midrange units, a big-ass dome tweeter designed to be crossed-over low to the midranges (I assume now to avoid the infamous Kevlar cone problems at higher frequencies), and a leaf super-tweeter for, well, whatever reason. I wasn't happy with how my Levinson 334 sounded with the Foci, and I was going to sell it and try a 336, but the dealer suggested I try vertical bi-amping the 334s, and lent his demo unit for the weekend. I scoffed at the notion, and explained why, but he shamed me into agreement by offering to deliver it and pick it up.

At first I didn't hear any difference, but after listening for a couple hours I noticed that I still wanted to listen for a couple of more hours rather than the listening fatigue I was experiencing with only one 334. It reminded of the experience years before on different speakers when I dumped my PS Audio amp for a pair of old Krell KMA-100MkII monoblocks that seemed to cause less listening fatigue. Maybe the whole thing was in my head, but I bought the second 334. I never heard the difference in direct comparison. Nonetheless, I always blamed the whole thing on some weakness in the Levinson 334 rather than support for the efficacy of passive bi-amping, and I've never heard a similar effect on other speakers since, including the Salon2s. Of course, I've never run into another cone speaker that was such an annoying load on an amp as the Focus either, though I'm not convinced that the AT3000 couldn't handle the Legacy without bi-amping. (I bought the ATI after I sold the Foci.) I remember feeling pretty strongly about it at the time though. The second 334 was something like $5000 back then.

I remember that quote from Kevin V when it was published. I wrote it off to high-end BS justifying two pairs of terminals.
 
Last edited:
E

erwinfrombelgium

Audiophyte
There might be a difference, sonically, bi-amping or not bi-amping. Maybe.

But without a doubt, there will be enormous differences with vs without some proper passive room treatments that cost pennies compared to any audiophile amplifier you would care to bring to the shoot-out

Problem is, I don't see any room treatments... You might want to try it some day. The current king of DRC, Dirac (in the XMC-1) is also very clear on this: you need passive room treatments to deal with reflections, and then Dirac will take care of issues below, say, 500 Hz.
 
RichB

RichB

Audioholic Field Marshall
^ There are couches and rugs in the room. There are large openings in the 30 foot room. I get very good room measurements.

I was able to flatten the bass in <30 minutes using PEQ on the XMC-1.

So far, I am not a fan of REQ after many, many tries.

- Rich
 
Last edited:
AcuDefTechGuy

AcuDefTechGuy

Audioholic Jedi
I think almost everything is pretty much a "Maybe" in this hobby that depends on everything under the sun, including whether the "King" of Room Correction software is DIRAC, ARC, Audyssey, Harman, Lyngdorf or just plain Bypass.
 
Last edited:
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top